![]() |
The Westin Boston Waterfront is pretty well sitauted for getting to BOS.
|
Whatever you do, if you go into town for the night, don't go back to the airport the next day to rent your car. Why pay the fees and surcharges that apply only to airport rentals? IIRC, these are substantial at BOS.
|
Originally Posted by TimMeineke
(Post 7736195)
Am I reading it correctly that I'm better off staying in Boston, rather than one of the "airport" properties, because they are actually closer to the airport? I'm flying in at midnite with my wife and 2 year old picking up a rental car the next day. Which has the best value for the points?
|
Honestly, as somebody with a wife and baby myself, if I was in your situation, I'd go ahead and bite the bullet and just stay at the Hilton Boston Logan Airport. Its a very nice, newer hotel, and its the only hotel that you can walk to from the airport terminals. Also on airport propert is the Hyatt Harborside, but you will need a shuttle for that one.
If you insist on staying in a Starwood property, than the Westin Waterfront is the closest to BOS, just on the other side of the Ted Williams Tunnel. But frankly your life would be a lot easier if you stayed at the Hilton. |
Originally Posted by Jumpgate
(Post 7733508)
Let me throw my vote in for the Sheraton Commander. It's a grand hotel that went under a great renovation. It's very convenient to th T and in an excellent location. They are liberal with upgrades and the suites are marvelous.
Skip the restaurant though. Harvard Square is right there. I love how all of us apparently care more than the OP! |
I've burned all of my Hilton points over the last 2 months so it's definitely Starwood.
I'm going to Providence the next day. I plan to rent a car instead of taking the train because we'll have a lot of luggage, and 3 train tickets can get expensive. My priorities are 1) not having too long of a cab ride from the airport, 2) a decent hotel (and now that I think of it, I believe that I've stayed at the 4Pts before and didnt love it), 3) a suite so that I can put my son's crib in the other room, 4) breakfast in the hotel, preferably in a lounge/buffet setting and 5) somewhat near a rental car. Lastly, the Westin Waterfront is sold out that night. Based on what I've read on other threads, it sounds like the Commander is my best choice (there's an Avis in Cambridge). Does that sound right? |
Originally Posted by TimMeineke
(Post 7754320)
...Based on what I've read on other threads, it sounds like the Commander is my best choice (there's an Avis in Cambridge). Does that sound right?
(To Bostonians: yeah, I understand that it's a few miles shorter to take the Expressway south, but the easiest route is usually the best route for those unfamiliar w/Boston.) |
There's a National Car Rental on Mass Ave not too far from the Commander if you prefer them instead of Avis.
|
Westin Waterfront is ok but only stay there if you are going to the convention. The Sheraton Copley is awesome. Just got back from a stay there.
|
I just stayed at Westin Copley on Friday night. Upgraded to a "Jr. Suite" which is just a slightly-larger corner room as Platinum without having to request and upgrade. Great service at check-in, attentive staff, and clean, relatively modern rooms.
My only complaint would be the valet area (was backed up with tour buses, taxis, and full of valet cars when we arrived) - it is too small and not staffed by enough valets to handle all the traffic under the lobby awning when it is raining. I was not offered any breakfast as a Plat. |
Originally Posted by jswede1507
(Post 7779350)
Westin Waterfront is ok but only stay there if you are going to the convention. The Sheraton Copley is awesome. Just got back from a stay there.
As a point of clarification, I'll just add that the Sheraton is actually called the Sheraton BOSTON. Some here on FT refer to it as the Sheraton Copley (which isn't really incorrect) which might cause some to become confused. For the record, it's the Sheraton Boston and the Westin Copley. The walk between the two is quite short. |
Originally Posted by 76toPHL
(Post 7780290)
I just stayed at Westin Copley on Friday night. Upgraded to a "Jr. Suite" which is just a slightly-larger corner room as Platinum without having to request and upgrade. Great service at check-in, attentive staff, and clean, relatively modern rooms.
[snip] I was not offered any breakfast as a Plat. |
Originally Posted by Seattlenerd
(Post 7783549)
I've been staying Westin Copley regularly for three years -- breakfast is not a Plat benefit at this property. I've also had them mark my reservation file at the hotel requesting the complimentary Plat water in the room every day, as it tends to be hit and miss otherwise. That's a nice feature, that they can tag your reservation with special requests locally that persists across stays.
|
Originally Posted by MFLetou
(Post 7722200)
I'm also willing to bet that as you trek across the Charles back and forth, trudge through the somewhat worn down Harvard Square and ugly subway station, you WILL wish you just had just shelled out the extra money for the nice, serene, convenient Westin.
Harvard Square is an amazing place. For me it was pleasant to walk through it |
We just stayed at the Westin Copley, paid 12K points plus $35 for an upgrade to Junior Suite (they said it would cost more for a non-gold member).
The hotel was ok but not as good as I expected. The furniture was somewhat worn out, couch and chairs dusty, bathtub was small and very uncomfortable, TV was not working!, also there were some problems with the sink and the toilet. Room service was slow. We went to see Cambridge/Harvard Square and I liked that location and actually thought we should have stayed at the Commander. It's a good location for nightlife/bars. Copley square location is better if you are in town for shopping. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.