Can you earn 30 elite night credits for Bonvoy from credit cards?
#61
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LCY
Programs: SQ Krisflyer, QR Privilege Club, MB LT Plt (1K+ nights thx MB)
Posts: 1,038
I do not agree. Many flyertalkers including me have had both the personal AND corporate/business cards for many years. None of us received 15 additional elite nights last year, and many of us received those 15 elite nights overnight. It appears to me Marriott is adding these 15 elite nights for business card holders on purpose rather than the IT screwing up. IT actually had to write additional codes to make this work (compared to last year).
#62
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SEA/NYC/IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Titanium, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 1,920
To be fair, hotel status is much easier to acquire in NA compared to elsewhere (e.g. Hilton Diamond via credit card).
#63
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Programs: SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, IHG Spire
Posts: 155
Checked my account a few times yesterday and today to see if this also applies to Canadians who have both cards. Nothing yet, but I'm still hoping it might come through. As someone who doesn't have many stays planned this year, if 5 SNAs were only 20 nights away instead of 35, I would absolutely spend the extra money needed to make sure I had 20 paid nights by the end of the year. No hesitation from me whatsoever.
I'm not sure how likely it is, but given how events are being cancelled into June now, could the 15 additional nights for multi-card holders be something Marriott has decided to do as a one-time thing this year only?
I'm not sure how likely it is, but given how events are being cancelled into June now, could the 15 additional nights for multi-card holders be something Marriott has decided to do as a one-time thing this year only?
#67
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westchester Co, NY or Rio Grande Valley, TX or ???
Programs: BAEC G, WN A-, Hyatt G, HH G, MAR T, Hz PC, was [UA2P, FL A+Elite, BD G]
Posts: 2,271
TL;DR: try applying for the business card before closing another card...
#69
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: OZ Diamond
Posts: 6,134
Does anyone here think this move is designed to help decrease the number of people cancelling their cards, specifically those that carry more than one? With recent devaluation of the free night awards, many feel the annual fee is no longer worth the hassle. However, with 15 EQN plus the devalued free night, it may be worthwhile to keep them.
LAX
LAX
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,896
Does anyone here think this move is designed to help decrease the number of people cancelling their cards, specifically those that carry more than one? With recent devaluation of the free night awards, many feel the annual fee is no longer worth the hassle. However, with 15 EQN plus the devalued free night, it may be worthwhile to keep them.
LAX
LAX
Already you can see people complaining since this seems to be exclusive to the US. Pretty soon some people here will separate the "real" Platinum members from the "fake" ones.
#71
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 7
A few years before the Starwood purchase Chase was actively marketing existing customers who had a Marriott Rewards personal and Chase business (ink) card to also obtain a Marriott Rewards business card as it would enable one to get closer to Gold (now Platinum) with the feature of having 15 nights credited for EACH card. I received mailings and e-mails with the number of nights in my Marriott Rewards account and how the added card would affect status, in addition to the 2nd free night, which the business card provided at Category 5 vs. 4 for the personal card. I applied for the 2nd Marriott card and enjoyed the 30 nights (15 personal + 15 business) credit until the Starwood merger when the "stacking" feature was revoked.
Glad to see that the stacking feature is being restored to what the marketing program pushed and what it once was.
Glad to see that the stacking feature is being restored to what the marketing program pushed and what it once was.
#72
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: OZ Diamond
Posts: 6,134
A few years before the Starwood purchase Chase was actively marketing existing customers who had a Marriott Rewards personal and Chase business (ink) card to also obtain a Marriott Rewards business card as it would enable one to get closer to Gold (now Platinum) with the feature of having 15 nights credited for EACH card. I received mailings and e-mails with the number of nights in my Marriott Rewards account and how the added card would affect status, in addition to the 2nd free night, which the business card provided at Category 5 vs. 4 for the personal card. I applied for the 2nd Marriott card and enjoyed the 30 nights (15 personal + 15 business) credit until the Starwood merger when the "stacking" feature was revoked.
Glad to see that the stacking feature is being restored to what the marketing program pushed and what it once was.
Glad to see that the stacking feature is being restored to what the marketing program pushed and what it once was.
LAX
#73
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bangkok
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy Titanium, BAEC Silver, TK Miles & Smiles Elite
Posts: 2,209
I'm still trying to understand why Marriott would do this given that all their efforts since the merger have been to reduce the number of unearned nights (from multiple cards, meetings, multiple rooms) that people can accrue to get to elite tiers quicker.
Anyone know, and I mean *know* rather than just *think*, how the business relationship works between Marriott and the card issuers? Does Marriott share any of the revenue from the card spend? If so, then they may have done a calculation that the cash they will earn from an additional card will outweigh the cost of the free elite nights. But this implies that people with more than one card spend more than they would if they had just one card. Is this true? My monthly spend is what it is irrespective of the payment method but is there evidence that people spend more if they have multiple cards? If it's not about the income from spend, then what is it about?
For people with multiple cards, from Marriott's point of view why does it make sense for you to spread your spend across multiple cards (from your point of view of course you're getting the benefits of each card). I'm trying to understand why they would incentivise anyone to have more than one card in this way.
Anyone know, and I mean *know* rather than just *think*, how the business relationship works between Marriott and the card issuers? Does Marriott share any of the revenue from the card spend? If so, then they may have done a calculation that the cash they will earn from an additional card will outweigh the cost of the free elite nights. But this implies that people with more than one card spend more than they would if they had just one card. Is this true? My monthly spend is what it is irrespective of the payment method but is there evidence that people spend more if they have multiple cards? If it's not about the income from spend, then what is it about?
For people with multiple cards, from Marriott's point of view why does it make sense for you to spread your spend across multiple cards (from your point of view of course you're getting the benefits of each card). I'm trying to understand why they would incentivise anyone to have more than one card in this way.
#74
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: SFO/YYZ
Programs: AC 25K, AS MVP Gold, BA Bronze, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 2,466
I'm still trying to understand why Marriott would do this given that all their efforts since the merger have been to reduce the number of unearned nights (from multiple cards, meetings, multiple rooms) that people can accrue to get to elite tiers quicker.
Anyone know, and I mean *know* rather than just *think*, how the business relationship works between Marriott and the card issuers? Does Marriott share any of the revenue from the card spend? If so, then they may have done a calculation that the cash they will earn from an additional card will outweigh the cost of the free elite nights. But this implies that people with more than one card spend more than they would if they had just one card. Is this true? My monthly spend is what it is irrespective of the payment method but is there evidence that people spend more if they have multiple cards? If it's not about the income from spend, then what is it about?
For people with multiple cards, from Marriott's point of view why does it make sense for you to spread your spend across multiple cards (from your point of view of course you're getting the benefits of each card). I'm trying to understand why they would incentivise anyone to have more than one card in this way.
Anyone know, and I mean *know* rather than just *think*, how the business relationship works between Marriott and the card issuers? Does Marriott share any of the revenue from the card spend? If so, then they may have done a calculation that the cash they will earn from an additional card will outweigh the cost of the free elite nights. But this implies that people with more than one card spend more than they would if they had just one card. Is this true? My monthly spend is what it is irrespective of the payment method but is there evidence that people spend more if they have multiple cards? If it's not about the income from spend, then what is it about?
For people with multiple cards, from Marriott's point of view why does it make sense for you to spread your spend across multiple cards (from your point of view of course you're getting the benefits of each card). I'm trying to understand why they would incentivise anyone to have more than one card in this way.
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,039
In many instances, use of a business card represents a separate income stream or cash flow from that involved for a personal card.
So there is additional revenue for the bank, not merely division of existing spend.
So there is additional revenue for the bank, not merely division of existing spend.