Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Marriott | Marriott Bonvoy
Reload this Page >

Marriott to Eliminate Single-use Toiletry Bottles

Marriott to Eliminate Single-use Toiletry Bottles

Old Aug 29, 19, 1:45 pm
  #121  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 934
Originally Posted by JBord View Post
Yes, I don't dispute that some good comes of it. But anyone thinking it's more than coincidental is fooling themselves. As soon as an even cheaper way to provide soap comes along, Marriott will find a reason to switch to that, and may go backwards in terms of environmentally friendly results. This time it worked out so they could put a good spin on it.

I don't like the dispensers, personally. So good for the environment, bad for me I guess. And likely very very good for Marriott's income statement.
sad that so many fail to see the good this type of approach will have for our planet. Sure it saves money because there is less waste.
Dreamworks likes this.
Collierkr is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 1:47 pm
  #122  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 934
Originally Posted by WillBarrett_68 View Post
I seriously doubt he needs them on a regular basis but we've all been caught on the road without one item or another, haven't we? It's usually easy enough to pop in a drug store but if the front desk has the item all the better.
I agree. If I need one I will ask. Putting them in every room all the time is a waste
Collierkr is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 1:53 pm
  #123  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 90,948
Originally Posted by Collierkr View Post


sad that so many fail to see the good this type of approach will have for our planet. Sure it saves money because there is less waste.
It’s not necessarily all “good” for the planet. This kind of hotel move undermines Infection prevention, and undermined infection prevention leads to increased consumption of antibiotics and all the bad that can mean.
KRSW, MSPeconomist and JBord like this.
GUWonder is online now  
Old Aug 29, 19, 1:57 pm
  #124  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 88,291
Originally Posted by GUWonder View Post


It’s not necessarily all “good” for the planet. This kind of hotel move undermines Infection prevention, and undermined infection prevention leads to increased consumption of antibiotics and all the bad that can mean.
Plus there's a lot of medical waste that must be incinerated and certainly not reused/recycled.
KRSW likes this.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 1:59 pm
  #125  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 47,488
I'm generally warming up to the idea of eliminating the single-use bottles. The first time I experienced it, I was at Aloft (they've already been doing it for years). It smacked of cheapness - something the hotel was doing because their target guests were fairly recently removed from college campuses where these are common. To me it felt like being in a locker room.

But now, I will say that the waste argument is convincing, and I honestly don't really care where my shampoo comes from - big bottle or little bottle. I still think the cheapness angle is there, but I'll live with it if this is environmentally better.

I do hope that a bar of soap remains. Those can come paper-wrapped. I just prefer a bar of soap over the body wash liquids.

If Marriott wants to get serious about the environment, how about stopping the use of disposable utensils, cups, and plates at breakfast. Kind of hard for a hotel to try to spin an eco-message when I have to use tiny styrofoam cups to get some juice and water in the morning. I see everybody grabbing multiple cups (e.g. 2 cups to get maybe 8 ounces of juice) and it all gets thrown away. I know washing dishes isn't carbon-free, but it has to be better than the total carbon cost of the unnecessary manufacturing, shipping, and then throwing away hundreds of pounds of garbage per property per day.
GUWonder and KRSW like this.
pinniped is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:04 pm
  #126  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: YYZ
Programs: Marriott/SPG, BR, CX, Aeroplan
Posts: 513
I would be a lot more receptive to the idea if Marriott were to also stop the use of plastic cups and use proper glasses. It would certainly move the narrative away from cost cutting, and also further reduce the environmental impact.

As is, Marriott is simply choosing the cheapest option, regardless of impact to the environment.
pinniped and KRSW like this.
Dave510 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:08 pm
  #127  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,399
Originally Posted by GUWonder View Post


It’s not necessarily all “good” for the planet. This kind of hotel move undermines Infection prevention,
what

are you like rubbing the shampoo bottle on your open sores???
WillBarrett_68 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:14 pm
  #128  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: DL Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, Hertz Prez Circle, National Exec
Posts: 1,275
Originally Posted by Antarius View Post
We get it, many of us dont think this is a problem worth worrying about.

How easy is it to do the same in a mini and drop it on the cart? Leave it in the room "untouched"? Extremely.
Anything is possible, but stop pretending there is no functional difference in both ease and opportunity in tampering with this



vs this.

GUWonder likes this.
Zeeb is online now  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:20 pm
  #129  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 90,948
Originally Posted by WillBarrett_68 View Post
what

are you like rubbing the shampoo bottle on your open sores???
No, but the suggestion about rubbing open sores or the body in general after touching the wall-mounted dispensers just goes toward the point that the wall-mounted toiletries will be a pathogen-spreading vector and likely lead to some increased use of antibiotics and all the bad that the overuse of antibiotics means for the planet.
KRSW likes this.
GUWonder is online now  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:22 pm
  #130  
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,399
Originally Posted by GUWonder View Post
[left]

No, but your suggestion about rubbing your open sores just goes toward the point that the wall-mounted toiletries will be a pathogen-spreading vector
nope

you're literally imagining this. nobody is going to catch ebola from shampoo dispensers
Dreamworks likes this.
WillBarrett_68 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:41 pm
  #131  
Suspended
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 32,085
Originally Posted by stimpy View Post
So Marriott is copying IHG? Here is the IHG thread from July. IHG to Eliminate toiletries single use across all brands

Only 115 posts. I am sure that this forum can beat that when it comes to toilet talk!
131 posts in a very short time. I knew we could do it!
stimpy is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:43 pm
  #132  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 90,948
Originally Posted by WillBarrett_68 View Post
nope

you're literally imagining this. nobody is going to catch ebola from shampoo dispensers
I am not the one imagining and introducing the narrative of catching Ebola from shampoo dispensers. That all has come from your post.

Ebola is a virus, so what does Ebola have to do with my comment about compromised infection prevention resulting in increased antibiotic use? Note to those who may not know this: antibiotic medication are not anti-viral medications. Try a different disease.
GUWonder is online now  
Old Aug 29, 19, 2:58 pm
  #133  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: AA PPro, LT Gold, UA LT 1K, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,060
The current small bottles have a seal on them. Things like the mouth wash has a piece of clear tape sealing the top. If I come across a container in the bathroom that was already open I don't use it. Again - that is why they are sealed. What keeps someone from putting something in the bottle.

Some European hotels I have stayed some time ago had dispensers but they were something you squeezed rather than pump - and in some cases they were in a sealed bag that got pierced when put in the holder rack. So not reused or refilled. Just a larger pouch than the small bottles.
pinniped, KRSW and Zeeb like this.
cova is offline  
Old Aug 29, 19, 3:54 pm
  #134  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: DL Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, Hertz Prez Circle, National Exec
Posts: 1,275
Originally Posted by cova View Post
The current small bottles have a seal on them. Things like the mouth wash has a piece of clear tape sealing the top. If I come across a container in the bathroom that was already open I don't use it. Again - that is why they are sealed. What keeps someone from putting something in the bottle.

Some European hotels I have stayed some time ago had dispensers but they were something you squeezed rather than pump - and in some cases they were in a sealed bag that got pierced when put in the holder rack. So not reused or refilled. Just a larger pouch than the small bottles.
I'd consider that to be a way better compromise for getting rid of single use toiletries than having a refillable pump bottle of shampoo or body wash in the room.
Zeeb is online now  
Old Aug 29, 19, 4:08 pm
  #135  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JMB Diamond Metal Card (OWE) , SAS Eurobonus Gold, (*G) Marriott Ambassador (LTP)
Posts: 11,496
Originally Posted by GUWonder View Post


Given the following

https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0617142534.htm

it’s not a big leap to expect that some people get sick from pathogens picked up from hotel remote controls.
Kirsch warns that this study is preliminary and is limited by the sample size, which included only 3 rooms in each state and 19 surfaces within each hotel room, but hopes that it is just the beginning of a body of research that could offer a scientific basis to hotel housekeeping.
The study is more about the cleaning process there is no realm indication that the level of contamination is at risk leves just because something has the highest level of contaminants does it mean that it poses a risk? If I go in to an industrial clean room, I am surely the highest carrier of contaminants (and I do poses a risk to the quale of the production) but does that make me a health risk to other people?

So it is a leap, while maybe not big, that I'd like to see some medical literature document.
CPH-Flyer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: