Ambassador vs Titanium
#31
Suspended


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
I am more than content with being Titanium. So much so that I worry that, based on many data points, an Ambassador might be a let down.
I will be at the Westin LAX tonight for a 2 night stay. Interestingly, the Presidential Suite was in the SNA pool. I didn't apply SNAs for this trip. I was already pre-upgraded to a high-floor Executive Lounge Access room before check-in.
I also received a pre-arrival e-mail from the Westin Experience Manager to which I replied providing my travel itinerary, expected arrival time and that I wouldn't require a late check-out with my early departure for a morning flight out of LAX.
This is a unique stay. I won't get into all the details but upon presentation of them, I received a follow up e-mail and was further upgraded to a Deluxe Corner Suite, Larger Suite, 1 King, Corner room. I am not sure an Ambassador, as an intermediary, would have effected the same result.
I have also been pre-upgraded to a Deluxe Harbour View room at the CY Hong Kong for my 3-night stay next week.
James
I will be at the Westin LAX tonight for a 2 night stay. Interestingly, the Presidential Suite was in the SNA pool. I didn't apply SNAs for this trip. I was already pre-upgraded to a high-floor Executive Lounge Access room before check-in.
I also received a pre-arrival e-mail from the Westin Experience Manager to which I replied providing my travel itinerary, expected arrival time and that I wouldn't require a late check-out with my early departure for a morning flight out of LAX.
This is a unique stay. I won't get into all the details but upon presentation of them, I received a follow up e-mail and was further upgraded to a Deluxe Corner Suite, Larger Suite, 1 King, Corner room. I am not sure an Ambassador, as an intermediary, would have effected the same result.
I have also been pre-upgraded to a Deluxe Harbour View room at the CY Hong Kong for my 3-night stay next week.
James
Now that Ambassador is an actually recognized status that is known to the hotel automatically well before your arrival (which wasn’t true with SPG), it’s certain that you would have been upgraded at least to the same suite you received as a Titanium—in fact, it’s likely you already might have been pre-upgrades to that suite or even a better suite, perhaps even the Presidential Suite, well before you arrived. Sometimes even a week or more in advance, depending on the hotel and its expected occupancy.
We no longe need the actual Ambassador person to contact hotels on our behalf to alert them to our Ambassador status—all Bonvoy hotels now know by virtue of the Marriott systems in place as soon as we are booked that we are Ambassador status guests. So hotels treat us better without ever needing to hear from our actual Ambassadors.
Case in point: I’m already pre-upgraded to a Macassar Suite at the Prince de Galles Paris for our stay....in October. That’s an award stay, no less. That doesn’t happen to a Titanium guest. And my status was all that’s important, as my Ambassador hadn’t done anything yet for that stay,
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: KHOU/KIAH
Programs: AA EXP | Marriott Bonvoy Titanium| Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 10,590
Do you think travelling solo make any differences ?
I mean, travelling as couple might be treated a bit better as hotel try to please elites who have special occasion trips.
Couples can have their honeymoon, wedding anniversary and so on.
Yet single traveler definitely not on any honeymoon or any wedding anniversary
and mostly will be considered as business stays by the hotel
Around 80% of my stays were for myself only.
I wonder if this the cause of the not so great experience I got so far.
I mean, travelling as couple might be treated a bit better as hotel try to please elites who have special occasion trips.
Couples can have their honeymoon, wedding anniversary and so on.
Yet single traveler definitely not on any honeymoon or any wedding anniversary

Around 80% of my stays were for myself only.
I wonder if this the cause of the not so great experience I got so far.
I get upgraded a decent amount, but the only times I ask or request is the few times I'm with family or friends. Otherwise, 99% of the time, it is just me and I dont really care.
My Feelings when getting a crazy suite
1. Oh wow this is huge!
2. Feel slightly special
3. Realize you do not need any of the space
4. Do not use any of the space
#33
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Marriott Ambassador & Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 218
Do you think travelling solo make any differences ?
I mean, travelling as couple might be treated a bit better as hotel try to please elites who have special occasion trips.
Couples can have their honeymoon, wedding anniversary and so on.
Yet single traveler definitely not on any honeymoon or any wedding anniversary
and mostly will be considered as business stays by the hotel
Around 80% of my stays were for myself only.
I wonder if this the cause of the not so great experience I got so far.
I mean, travelling as couple might be treated a bit better as hotel try to please elites who have special occasion trips.
Couples can have their honeymoon, wedding anniversary and so on.
Yet single traveler definitely not on any honeymoon or any wedding anniversary

Around 80% of my stays were for myself only.
I wonder if this the cause of the not so great experience I got so far.
#34
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1K 2MM; SPG LT Platinum
Posts: 392
My experience has been similar to bhrubins - this year in particular I have found the status recognition at every hotel to be notably different. Generally getting suite upgrades at more luxury hotels like StR, RC, W and LCs, and at others getting room upgrades. I do watch availability a few days before, and when i havent received something its generally because the hotel is almost sold out.
My ambassador also did did an awesome job arranging for special treatment on family vacations - even if not an upgrade when the resort is sold out, arranging for other special welcomes etc.
My ambassador also did did an awesome job arranging for special treatment on family vacations - even if not an upgrade when the resort is sold out, arranging for other special welcomes etc.
#35
Join Date: Jul 2013
Programs: DYKWIA, But I'm a "Diamond Guest" UA 1K/2MM
Posts: 2,169
My experience has been similar to bhrubins - this year in particular I have found the status recognition at every hotel to be notably different. Generally getting suite upgrades at more luxury hotels like StR, RC, W and LCs, and at others getting room upgrades. I do watch availability a few days before, and when i havent received something its generally because the hotel is almost sold out....
#36
Suspended


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
Of course, I am a returning guest now to most of the hotels at which I stay alone for business, and that combination--Ambassador status and returning guest--probably puts me at the top of the pack at any of those.
Most of my other stays are for special occasions and/r with my husband, sometimes but not always as repeat guest. Many of those are as repeat guests (SLS Beverly Hills, StR San Francisco, Prince de Galles Paris) but many will be as first time guests (Nobis Copenhagen, Grand Bretagne, Mystique Santorini, Edition West Hollywood).
Last edited by bhrubin; Aug 17, 19 at 6:38 pm
#37
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Newport Beach / San Francisco / Seattle
Programs: UA GS 1MM, Amex Centurion, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 267
I've only had Ambassador status (this year is my 3rd year) and SPG Platinum so can't comment on the differences of Titanium vs Ambassador. That being said, I really like my Ambassador - she's very responsive, remembers little details about me and my stay preferences, and has set up a few nice surprises for me in the past (flower petals on bed spelling out happy birthday for my partner, for example).
THAT said, I have had pretty poor "upgrade" success stateside. This may be due to the particular property I regularly stay at. Of my 60+ nights at this property this year, I have been upgraded to a suite exactly 2 nights. Not a huge deal - I don't usually need the space when I'm by myself, but I've had enough other service misses to make me feel a sense of relief that I've already re-qualified as Ambassador for 2020 and can move over to Hyatt for the rest of the year.
THAT said, I have had pretty poor "upgrade" success stateside. This may be due to the particular property I regularly stay at. Of my 60+ nights at this property this year, I have been upgraded to a suite exactly 2 nights. Not a huge deal - I don't usually need the space when I'm by myself, but I've had enough other service misses to make me feel a sense of relief that I've already re-qualified as Ambassador for 2020 and can move over to Hyatt for the rest of the year.
#38
Join Date: Feb 2016
Programs: DL DM, SPG Plat 100/LT Gold, Marriott Plat, National Executive Elite
Posts: 2,988
That's why I already am pre-upgraded to a Macassar Suite at the Prince de Galles Paris...for our stay in October. On an award stay. My Ambassador didn't have to do anything. The hotel just saw that I am Ambassador status and a returning guest--and upgraded me.
That's why I was pre-upgraded to suites at the RC Coconut Grove, RC Georgetown, StR Bahia Beach, RC Boston, StR San Francisco, RC Bacara Santa Barbara, RC Half Moon Bay, LM Cambridge, LM Arlington, LM Philly, Sheraton Philly Univ City, FP NYC Chelsea, FP NYC Midtown, CY New Haven, Sheraton Hartford South, Ren Providence, Sheraton Boston, etc. All since Feb 13.
Ambassador status matters now. A lot.
.
That's why I was pre-upgraded to suites at the RC Coconut Grove, RC Georgetown, StR Bahia Beach, RC Boston, StR San Francisco, RC Bacara Santa Barbara, RC Half Moon Bay, LM Cambridge, LM Arlington, LM Philly, Sheraton Philly Univ City, FP NYC Chelsea, FP NYC Midtown, CY New Haven, Sheraton Hartford South, Ren Providence, Sheraton Boston, etc. All since Feb 13.
Ambassador status matters now. A lot.
.
But my point is - when you stay - you spend a lot on ancillaries - and that combined with your high Ambassador spend probably enhances the already nice upgrades an Ambassador Elite with $20,001 of spend would expect.
#39
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: None - previously UA
Posts: 4,728
As a Titanium, I totally disagree. My upgrades are 100% over the room booked whether revenue or award nights. Many of those upgrades were to suites and some to suites that would be excluded from the SNA pool. I had 100% success in applying 5 SNA from last year; never have I been declined on a request. I also frquently get hand written notes of thanks along with a gift that is in my room upon arrival ranging from chocolates & fruit to French Champagne & macaroons. Post acquisition, pre-merger, I almost walked away. pm-SPG properties were the worst for me during that time and I avoided them. Now they are usually my first choice.
James
James
#40
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,254
My last 3 stays as a Titanium I applied SNA s and was denied, and in the end received no upgrade at check-in and in one case I pretty much got the worst room on the property (I went back and got another still above the AC units but better than before) Now in each case hotel was sold out but I dont really see that as an excuse to not provide any kind of upgrade. Its more a sign of disorganization on the part the property and an indictment of how upgrades are prioritized - at least for Titaniums. My SNAs are possibly going to go unused this year - I didnt use them earlier in the year saving them for summer vacation period and they have failed to provide any benefit when I wanted to use them. The experiences and upgrades people are reporting as Ambassadors seem a world away from my recent Titanium experiences. Yeah I suspect it will change but Im not going to regret giving up Titanium for Platinum.
I still follow the Ambassador related threads in hopes it might mature to something that I might actually find value in. I am not yet convinced! It isn't that I can't make the spend requirement, it is that I choose no to. Outliers (yes that is the plural of outlier, a data set can have more than one) can't convince me that when a monetary component is added to a "loyalty" program that spend isn't a factor in their successes. I think I would be naive in thinking that $20,001 Ambassador Elite will get the same recognition as one who spends $50K+.
If someone wants to spend $11K on some reservations at luxury properties for me and prove me wrong, I am all ears!

James
#41
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 575
I would like to see a bigger gap between Titanium and Ambassador. I agree the Your24 benefit and the ambassador is a huge benefit. But to me someone that stays close to 150 nights and spends close to $30,000 should get added benefits then someone that just stays 75 nights a year. Two ideas I would love for them to implement. Ambassador should get 100% Bonus points, a 40k certificate, get both arrival points and breakfast/F&B Certificate.
#42
Suspended


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
Agreed. I think there are other factors at play that go into your high success rate with specialty suites - I mean don't you bring in like 10% of the annual meeting revenue of the StR San Francisco? Just kidding. :P
But my point is - when you stay - you spend a lot on ancillaries - and that combined with your high Ambassador spend probably enhances the already nice upgrades an Ambassador Elite with $20,001 of spend would expect.
But my point is - when you stay - you spend a lot on ancillaries - and that combined with your high Ambassador spend probably enhances the already nice upgrades an Ambassador Elite with $20,001 of spend would expect.

I do spend plenty on F&B.
As evidenced by the many verified Ambassadors in our FB group, it's quite clear that many others also get my kind of treatment.
#43
Suspended


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
My last 3 stays as a Titanium I applied SNA ‘s and was denied, and in the end received no upgrade at check-in and in one case I pretty much got the worst room on the property (I went back and got another still above the AC units but better than before) Now in each case hotel was sold out but I don’t really see that as an excuse to not provide any kind of upgrade.
#44
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,254
I would like to see a bigger gap between Titanium and Ambassador. I agree the Your24 benefit and the ambassador is a huge benefit. But to me someone that stays close to 150 nights and spends close to $30,000 should get added benefits then someone that just stays 75 nights a year. Two ideas I would love for them to implement. Ambassador should get 100% Bonus points, a 40k certificate, get both arrival points and breakfast/F&B Certificate.
Marriott only values members that have 100 nights AND spends $20K. Period! Easy for some, not feasible for others. Not all Ambassador Elites get there on their own dime.
Your24 & an ambassador may be a huge benefit to you but many data points suggest that Your24 is usually denied and here crickets when waiting for their ambassador to reply. Yet others will say that their Ambassador is excellent in fulfilling special requests working with the properties in one breath and suggest that the properties knowing your Ambassador Elite Status is the driving force in another depending on what is appropriate for the argument.
I have suggested gifts for Elites attaining 100 nights and subsequent 25 night intervals with increasing value. If Marriott doesn't want to value a 100 night Elite without the spend, at least offer a gift for the 100/125/150 night level as a consolation. It might incentivise a few to remain loyal past 75 Nights and reach the spend requirement even if it takes to 125 or more nights.
James
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Programs: Bonvoy Ambassador & Lifetime Titanium, IHG Plat, HH Gold, Trident Plat, DL Diamond, AI Maharajah
Posts: 29,341
at the end of the day it all depends on your stay patterns & the ambassador service will vary greatly depending on that....
i was among the first group of members who received ambassadors way back in 2010 when it was an invitation only program....the ambassador service was amazing at that point of time....my ambassador was constantly in touch with the hotel, before & during my stay....the property was made aware of the fact that i was a special guest & it didn't matter if the property was a four points or a st. regis, i was treated extremely well....
my work stay patterns have not changed over the last 9 years....i always stay at the property closest to the venue i need to be at for work....so once again, it doesn't matter if the property is an element or courtyard or st. regis....i don't care about suite upgrades when traveling for work so it makes no difference what my ambassador does before or during these stays....my award stay patterns have changed greatly over the years....before my kids were born, my wife & i stayed at the best hotels around the world....usually cat 6 & 7 properties....when we started traveling with our kids, we prioritized things like space & kitchenettes over luxury properties....i now enjoy staying at properties like residence inns & towneplace suites....if i need a suite during a vacation stay then i either use a suite night or book the suite directly....most properties i stay in now for vacations don't really require much input from an ambassador....
i have noticed a severe change over the years at how properties treated an ambassador guest....when it was an invitation only program, every property treated us extremely well....when the program became public & the earning requirements were introduced, i noticed that the treatment started to decline at lower end properties while it remained consistent at higher end properties....over the years the treatment became non-existent at lower end properties & became hit & miss at higher end properties....this year i have started to receive some level of recognition at lower end properties & treatment at higher end properties has once again become good....
the reason for above is pretty obvious....initially there were only a handful of guests who were given ambassadors....so the ambassadors were able to do a lot more for each guest....they were constantly in touch with the hotels where we were staying & made sure everything went right with our stay....when the number of guests increased, the ambassadors had less time to spend for each guest & therefore were not in touch with the hotels as much as they used to be earlier....higher end properties were better at responding to ambassador requests while lower end properties were not....i'm sure the initial plan of the ambassador program was to make sure guests had near perfect stays, no matter whether they stayed at an aloft or a luxury collection property but as the number of guests increased the amount of time each ambassador spent for them decreased....
i've realised that i use my ambassador fairly infrequently now, except for your24 requests (which i use for most of my stays) & for things like making sure my stay & points post correctly....if i don't qualify for ambassador status next year then the only thing i will miss is your24....i don't think i will find any other difference between titanium & ambassador....
i was among the first group of members who received ambassadors way back in 2010 when it was an invitation only program....the ambassador service was amazing at that point of time....my ambassador was constantly in touch with the hotel, before & during my stay....the property was made aware of the fact that i was a special guest & it didn't matter if the property was a four points or a st. regis, i was treated extremely well....
my work stay patterns have not changed over the last 9 years....i always stay at the property closest to the venue i need to be at for work....so once again, it doesn't matter if the property is an element or courtyard or st. regis....i don't care about suite upgrades when traveling for work so it makes no difference what my ambassador does before or during these stays....my award stay patterns have changed greatly over the years....before my kids were born, my wife & i stayed at the best hotels around the world....usually cat 6 & 7 properties....when we started traveling with our kids, we prioritized things like space & kitchenettes over luxury properties....i now enjoy staying at properties like residence inns & towneplace suites....if i need a suite during a vacation stay then i either use a suite night or book the suite directly....most properties i stay in now for vacations don't really require much input from an ambassador....
i have noticed a severe change over the years at how properties treated an ambassador guest....when it was an invitation only program, every property treated us extremely well....when the program became public & the earning requirements were introduced, i noticed that the treatment started to decline at lower end properties while it remained consistent at higher end properties....over the years the treatment became non-existent at lower end properties & became hit & miss at higher end properties....this year i have started to receive some level of recognition at lower end properties & treatment at higher end properties has once again become good....
the reason for above is pretty obvious....initially there were only a handful of guests who were given ambassadors....so the ambassadors were able to do a lot more for each guest....they were constantly in touch with the hotels where we were staying & made sure everything went right with our stay....when the number of guests increased, the ambassadors had less time to spend for each guest & therefore were not in touch with the hotels as much as they used to be earlier....higher end properties were better at responding to ambassador requests while lower end properties were not....i'm sure the initial plan of the ambassador program was to make sure guests had near perfect stays, no matter whether they stayed at an aloft or a luxury collection property but as the number of guests increased the amount of time each ambassador spent for them decreased....
i've realised that i use my ambassador fairly infrequently now, except for your24 requests (which i use for most of my stays) & for things like making sure my stay & points post correctly....if i don't qualify for ambassador status next year then the only thing i will miss is your24....i don't think i will find any other difference between titanium & ambassador....