Justification for Residence Inn only earning 5 points per dollar?
Jul 20, 2019, 7:51 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC (LGA, JFK), CT
Programs: Delta Platinum, American Gold, JetBlue Mosaic 4, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Diamond,
Posts: 4,894
Justification for Residence Inn only earning 5 points per dollar?
I’ve been booking more Residence Inn properties lately for quick one or two night stays. Often they are in suburban / small town areas near leisure activities, and many times they are newer and nicer than comparable properties (Hilton Garden Inn, Courtyard, Best Western, etc). They are also usually more expensive by about $10-20. I just booked a $300+ Residence Inn when the comparable Courtyard was $295, Hampton Inn was $285, etc. In these areas, usually the choices are boutiques or various limited service brands.
The issue is that there stays earn half as many points as standard. Why does the Residence Inn earn 5 points per dollar when the less expensive Courtyard across the street or parking lot earns 10 points? Does the free breakfast cost that much? Why does Residence Inn earn less than Fairfield (which is a lower price brand)? Given how expensive Residence Inn is becoming, Marriott should revisit this
The issue is that there stays earn half as many points as standard. Why does the Residence Inn earn 5 points per dollar when the less expensive Courtyard across the street or parking lot earns 10 points? Does the free breakfast cost that much? Why does Residence Inn earn less than Fairfield (which is a lower price brand)? Given how expensive Residence Inn is becoming, Marriott should revisit this
Jul 20, 2019, 8:09 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSY; 2-time FT Fantasy Football Champ, now in recovery.
Programs: AA lifetime GLD; UA Silver; Marriott LTTE; IHG Plat,
Posts: 14,518
It's not about the price - as you note, RI is often priced the same or more as other brands.
And it's not about the breakfast - other free breakfast brands like fairfield earn 10x.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
And they may be right. I've had two stays in my life of over two months. In both cases, I opted for RI, even knowing the points were half, because for that long a stay, having the extra space and the kitchen was pretty important to me.
And it's not about the breakfast - other free breakfast brands like fairfield earn 10x.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
And they may be right. I've had two stays in my life of over two months. In both cases, I opted for RI, even knowing the points were half, because for that long a stay, having the extra space and the kitchen was pretty important to me.
Jul 20, 2019, 8:26 am
#3
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: None - previously UA
Posts: 4,864
Why does the Residence Inn earn 5 points per dollar when the less expensive Courtyard across the street or parking lot earns 10 points? Does the free breakfast cost that much? Why does Residence Inn earn less than Fairfield (which is a lower price brand)? Given how expensive Residence Inn is becoming, Marriott should revisit this
Jul 20, 2019, 8:38 am
#4
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Platinum/LT Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,594
The reality is Marriott doesn't need to "justify" anything. If they decided to take a benefit away from the OP, I could understand wanting some explanation. But this is just the way the program works. Marriott has whatever business reasons they have for offering fewer points, and we customers have choices of where to stay. If you want more points, stay at the Courtyard. If you want a kitchen, stay at the RI. If you want to pay less, with room for your family, and have a kitchen, but no points, stay at the AirBnb.
I hope, along with everyone else, they do increase the points for RI's, and I'd choose them over CY's and SHS sometimes. But I wouldn't expect it any time soon.
Jul 20, 2019, 11:07 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: RSW
Programs: Delta - Silver; UA - Silver; HHonors - Diamond; IHG - Spire Ambassador; Marriott Bonvoy - Titanium
Posts: 14,185
Just an FYI that under Starwood one earned full room and incidentals credit at Element, but half the elite amenity points.
Jul 20, 2019, 11:47 am
#6
Join Date: May 2002
Programs: WN F9 HA UA AA IHG HH MR
Posts: 3,305
I usually have one long term stay of 3-4 months each year for contract work and have always stayed at RI. The Marriott Megabonuses for each stay was always substantially more than the base points and elite bonus at RI; which made Marriott Rewards work for me. Now bonvOY has reined in the promotions to the point where it does matter where I go for extended stays. This year "Endless Earning" bonus would yield a grand total of 1500 points for a 15 week stay (or about a dime per week).
I've moved to Homewood Suites which awards 10 full Honors points per dollar, and adds real Hilton bonuses too.
I've moved to Homewood Suites which awards 10 full Honors points per dollar, and adds real Hilton bonuses too.
Jul 20, 2019, 1:31 pm
#7
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,086
It's not about the price - as you note, RI is often priced the same or more as other brands.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
At least in my case the Marriott's would get another 30-50/night from me if they matched on the points/$, instead I drive another 15-20' spend less and get more points and better breakfast and even some dinner snacks.
Jul 20, 2019, 2:12 pm
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
IME for element, the kitchen depends on the room category you book, with the smallest rooms not really having kitchens and higher category rooms having bigger and better equipped kitchens than RI. TPS tend to have smaller kitchens with smaller (and obviously cheaper) major appliances unless it's a two bedroom unit.
Jul 20, 2019, 3:24 pm
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
Always wondered this -- I actively book away from RI as a result unless no other option (especially with the increasing number of CY/RI combos where location is the same and I don't need the extra RI "benefits")
Jul 20, 2019, 6:51 pm
#10
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,360
It's important to realize that despite what some people here think, Marriott's core business is being a hotel franchiser. While they do have a side business that provides hotel management services, the main "customer" for Marriott is the hotel owner.
The points that hotel guests receive are paid by the individual hotel. Complete speculation, but I'd imagine the 5 points/dollar anomaly can into existence due to way things were at the birth of the extended-stay market segment. Perhaps back in the days of yore when the rewards program was conceived, the profit margin at the extended stay brand (only Residence Inn at that point, I believe) was slim enough to warrant fewer points. (That assumes some brands always had a lower earning. I don't know my frequent guest history enough to know exactly when the anomaly started.)
Anyway, my point is that you'd need to look at market conditions back then and not today for the reason why these brands offer fewer points per dollar. I don't think these brands are significantly different today to justify the lower point earnings. But, once something that benefits a franchise is part of a franchise agreement, it's hard to remove it. If neither the franchises nor Marriott see a compelling business reason to switch from 5 to 10 points/dollar, expect the status quo to be maintained.
The points that hotel guests receive are paid by the individual hotel. Complete speculation, but I'd imagine the 5 points/dollar anomaly can into existence due to way things were at the birth of the extended-stay market segment. Perhaps back in the days of yore when the rewards program was conceived, the profit margin at the extended stay brand (only Residence Inn at that point, I believe) was slim enough to warrant fewer points. (That assumes some brands always had a lower earning. I don't know my frequent guest history enough to know exactly when the anomaly started.)
Anyway, my point is that you'd need to look at market conditions back then and not today for the reason why these brands offer fewer points per dollar. I don't think these brands are significantly different today to justify the lower point earnings. But, once something that benefits a franchise is part of a franchise agreement, it's hard to remove it. If neither the franchises nor Marriott see a compelling business reason to switch from 5 to 10 points/dollar, expect the status quo to be maintained.
Jul 20, 2019, 7:01 pm
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,139
I have to say that the number of points offered does not even qualify as the last item on my checklist for hotels.
Jul 20, 2019, 7:34 pm
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
OP - it is a mystery how a hotel chain makes up its own stuffs.
To make this even more simple - why are some RIs Cat. 6 but some are Cat. 1?
The only thing that I can say is try to make this simple. If you want more points, go to a CY. If you enjoy space, then RI.
There are always some trade-offs.
To make this even more simple - why are some RIs Cat. 6 but some are Cat. 1?
The only thing that I can say is try to make this simple. If you want more points, go to a CY. If you enjoy space, then RI.
There are always some trade-offs.
Jul 20, 2019, 8:26 pm
#13
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,086
It's not about the price - as you note, RI is often priced the same or more as other brands.
And it's not about the breakfast - other free breakfast brands like fairfield earn 10x.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
And they may be right. I've had two stays in my life of over two months. In both cases, I opted for RI, even knowing the points were half, because for that long a stay, having the extra space and the kitchen was pretty important to me.
And it's not about the breakfast - other free breakfast brands like fairfield earn 10x.
The three 5x brands - Residence Inn, Townplace, and Element - are the ones that Marriott views in the Extended Stay category. Maybe they feel that on a weeks-long stay you'll earn plenty even at 5x. Or maybe they think extended stay folks are less motivated by points.
And they may be right. I've had two stays in my life of over two months. In both cases, I opted for RI, even knowing the points were half, because for that long a stay, having the extra space and the kitchen was pretty important to me.
Jul 20, 2019, 11:50 pm
#14
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 902
It's important to realize that despite what some people here think, Marriott's core business is being a hotel franchiser. While they do have a side business that provides hotel management services, the main "customer" for Marriott is the hotel owner.
The points that hotel guests receive are paid by the individual hotel. Complete speculation, but I'd imagine the 5 points/dollar anomaly can into existence due to way things were at the birth of the extended-stay market segment. Perhaps back in the days of yore when the rewards program was conceived, the profit margin at the extended stay brand (only Residence Inn at that point, I believe) was slim enough to warrant fewer points. (That assumes some brands always had a lower earning. I don't know my frequent guest history enough to know exactly when the anomaly started.)
Anyway, my point is that you'd need to look at market conditions back then and not today for the reason why these brands offer fewer points per dollar. I don't think these brands are significantly different today to justify the lower point earnings. But, once something that benefits a franchise is part of a franchise agreement, it's hard to remove it. If neither the franchises nor Marriott see a compelling business reason to switch from 5 to 10 points/dollar, expect the status quo to be maintained.
The points that hotel guests receive are paid by the individual hotel. Complete speculation, but I'd imagine the 5 points/dollar anomaly can into existence due to way things were at the birth of the extended-stay market segment. Perhaps back in the days of yore when the rewards program was conceived, the profit margin at the extended stay brand (only Residence Inn at that point, I believe) was slim enough to warrant fewer points. (That assumes some brands always had a lower earning. I don't know my frequent guest history enough to know exactly when the anomaly started.)
Anyway, my point is that you'd need to look at market conditions back then and not today for the reason why these brands offer fewer points per dollar. I don't think these brands are significantly different today to justify the lower point earnings. But, once something that benefits a franchise is part of a franchise agreement, it's hard to remove it. If neither the franchises nor Marriott see a compelling business reason to switch from 5 to 10 points/dollar, expect the status quo to be maintained.
This. Because RI is a long-stay brand its properties probably have a different franchising fee structure, where properties pay Marriott less than other brands. Thus, because Marriott gets less on each dollar spent, the member gets fewer points.
Jul 21, 2019, 12:50 am
#15
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,717
Indeed, and this makes sense when you think about it. When you have long stays you have less customer turnover and therefore less customer acquisition which is basically Marriott’s value proposition to hotel owners. It provides less value to the hotel and so there’s not as much available as kick-backs to the guests.