,
Originally Posted by DL-Don
(Post 24822084)
The Idiots who Design Marriott Rooms...
...and get off my lawn, you damned kids! :D I gotta agree, sometimes the idiot designers go for fru fru crap over function, like the stupid glass walled bathrooms or the ridiculous square backed chairs with no armrests which are useless to sit in just because someone thinks they "look good." |
Originally Posted by djk7
(Post 24824311)
Any glass bathroom door seems like a horrible idea. Sometimes my wife accompanies me on business trips and sleeps in when I have to go in early. The bathroom door should block as much noise and light as possible.
For the love of God hotel chains -- PLEASE put in (or keep) closing, locking doors that block out ALL light and noise from the bathrooms. And while you're at it, please keep the showers fully enclosed with either a curtain or doors. No more of this permanent half-barrier glass nonsense that keeps the ambient air freezing cold when trying to take a shower!! |
I've also stayed at the SFO Airport Waterfront a lot lately and am not so sure about the new rooms. The glass, sliding bathroom door, as discussed, is not great. I also seem to remember that the closet no longer has a door at all. As long as I keep getting rooms with great airport views - I'll suppose I'll live.
|
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
(Post 24826452)
If I'm paying for a FS hotel I expect things like a desk and closet etc. On biz trips I spend a LOT of time working at the desk. I don't want to look @ my clothes hanging out in the open ala motel six.
|
Try the Radisson Blu Rome. Here's the bathroom.
http://images.oyster.com/photos/stan...3780-6-720.jpg :D |
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 24826647)
Try the Radisson Blu Rome. Here's the bathroom.
|
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 24826647)
Try the Radisson Blu Rome. Here's the bathroom.
|
Originally Posted by DL-Don
(Post 24822473)
They appear to have pulled out the tubs here and replaced them with walk-in showers. One positive in a sea of negative.
|
I will always check room pix before ever booking a room again from the Marriott chain.
|
Originally Posted by ito717
(Post 24826618)
I've also stayed at the SFO Airport Waterfront a lot lately and am not so sure about the new rooms. The glass, sliding bathroom door, as discussed, is not great. I also seem to remember that the closet no longer has a door at all. As long as I keep getting rooms with great airport views - I'll suppose I'll live.
Can't remember ever staying in a marriott branded property with no desk. A picture from the OP would have been nice. The SFO Marriott website still shows the old rooms with desks (of which I have stayed at many times). |
Agree with the OP. A room should have a desk. That'll be a deal breaker for me for a hotel room. Glass bathroom door? Also not nice.
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
(Post 24826647)
Try the Radisson Blu Rome. Here's the bathroom.
http://images.oyster.com/photos/stan...3780-6-720.jpg :D But maybe that's the idea of the design. A hotel with transparency.:p |
The Stuttgart Marriott is similar - no work-desk and no office-chair, just a movable desk in a height that suggests to sit on the sofa to work, but then there is no power outlet near that location.
I discussed this with one of their Manager's, and I was told I could get one of their conference rooms if needed to get work done for free. This was their response when I challenged the sanity of the decision to get rid of the work-desk in their rooms - they claimed it was in response to a survey where travelers overwhelmingly responded that a desk in the room was not needed. Greetings - Dirk |
Originally Posted by djohannw
(Post 24827365)
...when I challenged the sanity of the decision to get rid of the work-desk in their rooms - they claimed it was in response to a survey where travelers overwhelmingly responded that a desk in the room was not needed.
|
I am not a Marriott person, but I noticed this thread highlighted on the front page and cannot agree more. Many a hotel room requires an urgent update, but quite many of those are focused around wrong priorities. They just throw in some modern-looking fixtures and furniture (often prone to premature wear - did any FF&E person ever approve those), and the lack of a proper work desk is a total disaster.
On a totally contrarian note, one of my fave hotels (not a Marriott I know) is the Mercure Berlin Checkpoint Charlie, whose design is totally disgusting, but the room arrangement close to ideal: http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/med...3/our-room.jpg The desk is quite large, the power outlets are there, the TV rotates to serve both bed and desk (I believe you can plug in your device in as well) and the coffee machine is at hand. My only gripe is the lack of a proper office chair, but the one supplied is actually quite comfortable and well-adjusted to the desk height. While the Mercure's rooms are quite large, you can have a similar arrangement in a much smaller room, like @ Mercure Milano Solari: http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/med...ano-solari.jpg One of the reasons some Mercures do so well is that the chain imposes minimal design restrictions on its hotels. This one misses the office chair as well, though... ...which brings me to the modest Holiday Inn Express hotels. One of the common feature of the new room design in those is a very comfortable and modern office chair: http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/med...-walbrzych.jpg (this one is actually an Ibis Styles, rebranded soon after launching, but the rooms are formatted exactly to the HIExpress standards). If the lowly HIExpress (and Hamptons as well for that matter) can do that, why should I pay extra for a full-service hotel only to get a room where I can't work? |
Originally Posted by Tizzette
(Post 24826826)
The tubs weren't great but at least it was a tub for those who prefer a bath.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:03 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.