For regional flights, I agree with this comment.

For F, the seat and space around it within the “walls” are relatively small and when fully flat, you sleep quite low to the floor. The overall bed length is significantly longer than J though. The walls are only about 4 feet high with a door that requires some effort to open. Closing or deploying the door is much easier with a mechanism near the seat in the inner wall.

MH would have to substantially improve its soft product to make travelling in F worthwhile as I found the F seat (and J seat) to be very underwhelming. It was like MH chose the cheapest possible F seat with a wall in today’s market. I think it is a waste of space to even bother having an F cabin. The whole product looks more like a premium version of the seats in the row just behind, which it probably is.

And J is essentially the same seats as on the 330s with a little bit more width and pitch and thats’s it. Hardly any frills or features worth talking about. The PTV/ entertainment content and layout is pretty basic and navigation is easy and you do get an outside-camera channel but only a down-ward view which is useless most of the time.

The seats, fixtures and fittings seem to suggest MH had selected the most basic models or options from the catalogue and if you remove the crew from the scene and the very minimal MH logo/ emblem here and there (which are maybe only in the PTV content), the aircraft could have been operated by any airline. Makes me wonder if the intention was to have flexibility to return the aircraft to the lessor after just a few years and have another carrier operate them without much further customisation.

All in all, based on the hard products alone - it was underwhelming, sterile and not memorable - I would find it difficult to justify paying top dollar to fly MH long haul but maybe that is what MH is planning all along - to not charge top dollar.