MH Business Class Lounge Singapore
#16
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 305
What's the procedure for gaining lounge access in SIN when connecting from a non MH flight? Flying QF in J to SIN, connecting to MH in J to KUL. All on one ticket, so will likely be issued both BP's in Australia. Do I need to swing by a transfer desk to get an invite, or can I just present the MH BP at the lounge?
If you want to use the SATS lounge at T2, just show your J MH BP. They already know your entitlement and dont need a separate invitation card.
But the QF lounge at T1 is much better than the T2 SATS lounge.
#17
Join Date: Nov 2009
Programs: QF WP, WoH Glob, Accor Plat, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 291
#18
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,113
The F gates tho... min 20mins from the QF lounge. (But, that's probably a similar distance you'd have to walk anyway, just broken by a stop at SATS lounge.)
#19
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: BA SL, CX GR, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 569
it will also depend on which side of T2 you leave from... if you leave from E20-E28, it's about the same walk as from the QF lounge.
The F gates tho... min 20mins from the QF lounge. (But, that's probably a similar distance you'd have to walk anyway, just broken by a stop at SATS lounge.)
The F gates tho... min 20mins from the QF lounge. (But, that's probably a similar distance you'd have to walk anyway, just broken by a stop at SATS lounge.)
I noted the original MH lounge at SIN was under renovation. Is it coming back soon or it will be SATS forever?
#20
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here today gone tomorrow
Programs: *G, ow Saph
Posts: 2,865
SATS must really be screwing MH on the rates if it's cheaper to re-open a dedicated MH lounge in Singapore versus contracting to SATS!
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
#21
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ASIA
Programs: TK Elite, ALL Plus Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,530
SATS must really be screwing MH on the rates if it's cheaper to re-open a dedicated MH lounge in Singapore versus contracting to SATS!
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
#23
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: YVR, KUL
Programs: AC, MH, BA, AF-KL
Posts: 2,887
#24
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
SATS must really be screwing MH on the rates if it's cheaper to re-open a dedicated MH lounge in Singapore versus contracting to SATS!
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
With 5-6 x 737 flights a day, certainly MH dedicated lounge is nice to have but hardly easy to support, I'd think, given the number of daily pax with access rights. And SIN has many decent lounges so MH product won't likely be any better.
#25
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here today gone tomorrow
Programs: *G, ow Saph
Posts: 2,865
#26
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
BA's 3 flights seems to have a lot more J seats (closing to 300 for J+F) than QF's 4 A330s and 1 737 (around 120).
CX actually has 9 services ex SIN daily, one via BKK, that's about 400 J seats and they still doesn't want a lounge?
QF used to have a lot bigger traffic at SIN, would their lounge be a lot lot busier before partnership EK?
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
If my calculation was right,
BA's 3 flights seems to have a lot more J seats (closing to 300 for J+F) than QF's 4 A330s and 1 737 (around 120).
CX actually has 9 services ex SIN daily, one via BKK, that's about 400 J seats and they still doesn't want a lounge?
QF used to have a lot bigger traffic at SIN, would their lounge be a lot lot busier before partnership EK?
BA's 3 flights seems to have a lot more J seats (closing to 300 for J+F) than QF's 4 A330s and 1 737 (around 120).
CX actually has 9 services ex SIN daily, one via BKK, that's about 400 J seats and they still doesn't want a lounge?
QF used to have a lot bigger traffic at SIN, would their lounge be a lot lot busier before partnership EK?
#30
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here today gone tomorrow
Programs: *G, ow Saph
Posts: 2,865
You've seen it?
I'd expect it to be up to CX standard which isn't bad. Of course that's not the reason they are "staying far away", it's because they have chosen to move to T4 which will supposedly be better/faster for O&D traffic versus connections. Downside is that it's not connected physically to the other terminals though I assume they will run shuttle buses both landside and airside (not confirmed, just that I can't imagine Changi would be so shortsighted as to cut off this potential).
I'd expect it to be up to CX standard which isn't bad. Of course that's not the reason they are "staying far away", it's because they have chosen to move to T4 which will supposedly be better/faster for O&D traffic versus connections. Downside is that it's not connected physically to the other terminals though I assume they will run shuttle buses both landside and airside (not confirmed, just that I can't imagine Changi would be so shortsighted as to cut off this potential).