Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Malaysia Airlines | Enrich
Reload this Page >

MH 370 KUL-PEK Missing: 15 - 21 Mar 2014 UTC - ARCHIVE WEEK #2

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Mar 29, 2014, 8:45 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
This is ARCHIVE WEEK #2 (15 - 21 March UTC) of older posts from the original thread, MH 370 KUL-PEK Missing: now Search and Recovery [PLEASE SEE WIKI].

This thread contains a very few posts after midnight UTC, for reasons of post continuity.

THIS THREAD HAS BEEN LOCKED.
Print Wikipost

MH 370 KUL-PEK Missing: 15 - 21 Mar 2014 UTC - ARCHIVE WEEK #2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:37 am
  #151  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SYD
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by cnk
...it would be nice to have a list or Google Earth overlay to see what possible landing sites could have been considered. Ideally a list would show all of the runways over ___ ft in length within ____ nm of the last known location of the aircraft. While that list would be huge, a number of locations could be disregarded (located near major population centers, military bases of countries which certainly wouldn't be involved in anything of this sort - use your judgment on that one, etc.).
World runway data can be accessed from http://www.ourairports.com/data/

I'll edit in a map in a second.

Edit: It might take like 20min because the file does not contain Lat/Long data
Nrg800 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:38 am
  #152  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Programs: Costco Club
Posts: 1,155
Originally Posted by Fraport
I know gliding for an aircraft of this size has been ruled out, in the event of a catastrophic event, but can it be ruled out if it was planned? ie they calculated how much fuel they would have and where they could glide into undetected?

It feels like a super dumb question now that ive typed it out. It just doesnt make sense, as someone said,to take a plane and then run out of fuel.
The dude did have a full on 777 simulator in his house
StevenSeagalFan is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:40 am
  #153  
jxd
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SIN/BNE
Posts: 816
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
Upthread we had established already that the plane could have flown until 0811 with normal fuel on board.
With minimal fuel left. The crash site would be close to that spot then.
jxd is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:41 am
  #154  
us2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southern California/In the air
Programs: DL
Posts: 10,382
Originally Posted by jxd
Here's something intriguing. Last data received was at 0811 but the plane did not carry enough fuel to continue flying non stop until 0811. It had to land and refuel somewhere.
The aircraft was said to have departed with 7.5 hours of fuel. The flight took off from KUL at 1241. 1241 + 2:30 = 0811. If the plane was configured for max range cruise after the apparent diversion, that would have added some flying time.
us2 is online now  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:44 am
  #155  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by Nrg800
World runway data can be accessed from http://www.ourairports.com/data/

I'll edit in a map in a second.

Edit: It might take like 20min because the file does not contain Lat/Long data
In addition there may be disused military runways from previous conflicts that could have been patched up with minimum attention attracted. How to provision such a runway with Jet A - not so easy but....
snowbunnytx is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:46 am
  #156  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by snowbunnytx
In addition there may be disused military runways from previous conflicts that could have been patched up with minimum attention attracted. How to provision such a runway with Jet A - not so easy but....
I think getting a stock of Jet A would be easy compared to figuring out how to route a 777 for couple thousand miles without anybody noticing it.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:48 am
  #157  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,654
Originally Posted by us2
The aircraft was said to have departed with 7.5 hours of fuel. The flight took off from KUL at 1241. 1241 + 2:30 = 0811. If the plane was configured for max range cruise after the apparent diversion, that would have added some flying time.
The aircraft did not have to be flying to talk to the satellite at 0811. On the ground or water, it would still have worked.
DaveS is online now  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:49 am
  #158  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,179
Two corridors for the flight mentioned by PM

tsmith12 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:52 am
  #159  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cypress Hills Research Center
Posts: 5,295
Originally Posted by dsquared37
My first thought is a signal was picked up by the satellite but the time/distance calculated couldn't be deciphered from north or south. The 'corridors' mentioned do have symmetry if the satellite in question bisected the areas.
If the only useful info that the satellite picked up was a timestamp from the airplane then it would "know" that the aircraft was at some distance from it. So a circle with some radius. If there were two satellites then there would be two circles and those circles would intersect at two (at most) points. Perhaps these two points of intersection are the center of the North and South corridors? Any imprecision or offset in timestamps between the aircraft and the two satellites would "fuzzy up" the points of intersection but the corridors mentioned seem to be very large. I just don't know how they figured these regions out.

BTW, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan only share a border near the middle of the Caspian Sea, so I'm not even sure what that corridor is supposed to encompass. If it's from the Northernmost extent of Kaz to the Southernmost bit of Turk then this is one massively large area.
uszkanni is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:53 am
  #160  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,179
Here's MH370 passenger manifest (Name/Age/Nationality) ... Maybe it can be added to Wiki

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...&mg=reno64-wsj
tsmith12 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:56 am
  #161  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by tsmith12
Two corridors for the flight mentioned by PM

That upper arrow looks like it is pointing right at Chechnya, not known for its political stability but somewhat strong in terrorism.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:58 am
  #162  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,512
Originally Posted by tsmith12
Here's MH370 passenger manifest (Name/Age/Nationality) ... Maybe it can be added to Wiki

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...&mg=reno64-wsj
It is already in the wiki under Timeline/Facts.
NewbieRunner is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:59 am
  #163  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: body: A stone's throw from SFO, mind: SE Asia
Programs: Some of this 'n some of that
Posts: 17,263
Originally Posted by uszkanni

BTW, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan only share a border near the middle of the Caspian Sea, so I'm not even sure what that corridor is supposed to encompass. If it's from the Northernmost extent of Kaz to the Southernmost bit of Turk then this is one massively large area.
No, it is from that common border down to northern Thailand!!!
dsquared37 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:59 am
  #164  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SYD
Posts: 24
If you're looking for a "pleasant" way to go, crashing an airplane would be a LONG way down the list.
Nrg800 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 1:59 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,179
Police are searching the house of the pilot of missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, a senior Malaysian Police source has told the Reuters news agency.
tsmith12 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.