Originally Posted by SingaporeDon
(Post 22572224)
From today's Malaysian Press Release
3. Update on ACARS transmission a. The last ACARS transmission, sent at 1.07am, showed nothing unusual. The 1.07am transmission showed a normal routing all the way to Beijing. Does this not now debunk the "deliberate route change programmed into the FMS" theory? Would the ACARS not have picked it up, and the assertion today that "the 1:07 transmission showed a normal routing all the way to Beijing" put paid to the earlier theory which led to the "deliberate act" conclusion? It says nothing about what happened after the 1:07 transmission. |
Originally Posted by Letitride3c
(Post 22571461)
According to the Star Online in Malaysia, there're 40 controllers working/on duty the night of March 8 when MH370 and some of them are still haunted by what happened during their shift < Link > and I quote " all emergency protocol was followed immediately " " the decisions we make involve people’s lives and ... "
Very revealing insight into who did what, when and how during those crucial minutes. |
Australian Maritime Safety Authority Media Release - 23rd March, 2014, 2330 AEDT (1230 UTC)
Search operation for Malaysia Airlines flight MH370: Update 12
Enquiries: [email protected] Media kit and latest charts: http://www.amsa.gov.au/media/incidents/mh370-search.asp |
Originally Posted by iquitos
(Post 22572754)
So they knew almost real time that the plane had diverted having contacted Malaysian military radar?
MH370 never contacted the RMAF; RMAF radar picked them up on two radars, Kota Bharu and Butterworth, but the operator's either failed to notice or to report the target. The radar data were recorded, and sorting them later revealed the "boogie". No communication, merely an aircraft "painting" the screen. No way of even ascertaining 100% it was MH370. |
Oh dear!
A Malaysian official involved in the search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has contradicted public claims from the Malaysian government by saying that its military knowingly and continuously tracked the plane on radar for more than an hour after communication with ground control was severed in the early hours of March 8. The anonymous air force official told Chinese web portal Tencent that despite initial claims that they could not be certain, the Malaysian military knew very well that the plane they were tracking on radar was flight MH370 and followed it as it climbed above the Boeing 777's approved altitude of 45,000ft and took a sharp turn to the west before descending unevenly to 23,000ft on the approach to the island of Penang. The plane then climbed back to 35,000ft and headed northwest towards the Indian Ocean, with the final reading showing it above the tiny island of Pulau Perak in the Strait of Malacca at around 2.40am. Though they had known this all along, Malaysian authorities did not reveal this crucial information until March 15, a week after the plane's disappearance, the official said. It also meant that Malaysia knew from the beginning that the plane — if it had crashed — was likely in the Strait of Malacca region on the west side of the country as opposed to the South China Sea on the east side, where dozens of ships and aircraft from other countries searched fruitlessly for days, the official added. |
Malaysia’s unwillingness to release the full cargo manifest from missing Flight MH370 will hamper the search effort...
http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel...-1226863022091 This is truly bizarre... why would they withhold this information :confused: |
Originally Posted by JDiver
(Post 22574608)
MH370 never contacted the RMAF; RMAF radar picked them up on two radars, Kota Bharu and Butterworth, but the operator's either failed to notice or to report the target. The radar data were recorded, and sorting them later revealed the "boogie". No communication, merely an aircraft "painting" the screen. No way of even ascertaining 100% it was MH370.
“The officers called the air force, which confirmed they had detected the plane on their military radar but it had diverted from its path." http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Natio...onnel-on-duty/ |
New information that the flight dropped to 12,000 feet after turning, suggesting perhaps that the pilot tried to compensate for depressurization after some kind of catastrophic event —
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/23/world/...html?hpt=hp_t1 Is this the right thread for this? I hope so. |
Report on Sky News that the Chinese official news agency has claimed what appear to be new or more conclusive items of debris have been spotted
http://news.sky.com/story/1230750/mi...-objects-found ... and confirmed by the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26678492 |
Chinese spot white and rectangular objects-
http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-...#ixzz2wqoeq53m |
Don't know if this graphic timeline is up yet. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...-flight-MH370/
|
|
But Reuters reports that Australian authorities said a US Navy P-8 Poseidon, the most advanced search aircraft in the world, had been unable to find the objects. "A US Navy P-8 Poseidon aircraft was tasked to investigate reported object sightings by the Chinese aircraft made at 33,000ft," an AMSA spokeswoman said in an emailed response to Reuters. "The objects were spotted by the Chinese aircraft as it was heading back to Perth. Drift modelling was undertaken on the sighting. The P-8 was unable to relocate the reported objects." |
Latest AMSA release says that an RAAF Orion has also seen some debris today...
https://www.amsa.gov.au/media/docume...MH370FINAL.pdf |
Originally Posted by Trakman
(Post 22577036)
Latest AMSA release says that an RAAF Orion has also seen some debris today...
https://www.amsa.gov.au/media/docume...MH370FINAL.pdf Media Release 24th March, 2014: 2030(AEDT) Search operation for Malaysia Airlines aircraft: Update 15
E: [email protected] Video update to follow and posted in media kit. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.