Rosewood or Belmond? (Luang Prabang, Laos)
I'm planning a three-night stay in Luang Prabang, Laos next month. I'm torn between Rosewood (riverside room) and La Residence Phou Vao, a Belmond Hotel (Mountain View Junior suite). Below my initial assessment:
Rosewood: + Feels more luxurious (Bensley design) + More intimate (23 rooms vs. 32 at Belmond) - No gym Belmond: + Better facilities (the pool looks nicer, they have a fitness center) + Better view from the room (considering the room category I'm considering in both properties) - Online reviews not as good as those of Rosewood The location doesn't matter (both hotels have shuttles to the city and can plan my excursions). Any information to help me decide would be extremely appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
Stayed in Belmond a few years back. Was in the same position, got a good rate at Belmond and Rosewood was pretty new so went with Belmond
You've basically nailed the pros/cons from what i see. Good view, good spa/facilities. Service was off. Food was not good. I think we preferred our more modest hotel in town. I'd probably suggest Rosewood check out Manda de laos for dinner. |
For me - To walk/bike into town spur of the moment is a big plus and much easier from the Belmond.
|
I really like the look of the Riverside rooms and suites but they lack privacy as they are facing the reception and restaurant building across the river.
|
If it were me.... neither. Not sure what the rates are on the dates you're looking at, but Amantaka is much closer to the center of the action.
Amantaka is far from being among the best Aman properties in their portfolio, but La Residence Phuo Vhao was somewhat dark and depressing, and lacked the intimacy and privacy (similar to other Belmond properties in the region, including Governor's Residence in Yangon) and Rosewood is way too far - you won't get any sense of being in a very nice UNESCO town by staying there, IMO. |
Originally Posted by KI-NRT
(Post 34783506)
If it were me.... neither. Not sure what the rates are on the dates you're looking at, but Amantaka is much closer to the center of the action.
Amantaka is far from being among the best Aman properties in their portfolio, but La Residence Phuo Vhao was somewhat dark and depressing, and lacked the intimacy and privacy (similar to other Belmond properties in the region, including Governor's Residence in Yangon) and Rosewood is way too far - you won't get any sense of being in a very nice UNESCO town by staying there, IMO. |
Originally Posted by tdiddy23
(Post 34782569)
Stayed in Belmond a few years back. Was in the same position, got a good rate at Belmond and Rosewood was pretty new so went with Belmond
You've basically nailed the pros/cons from what i see. Good view, good spa/facilities. Service was off. Food was not good. I think we preferred our more modest hotel in town. I'd probably suggest Rosewood check out Manda de laos for dinner.
Originally Posted by erik123
(Post 34782580)
For me - To walk/bike into town spur of the moment is a big plus and much easier from the Belmond.
Originally Posted by Revolution
(Post 34782730)
I really like the look of the Riverside rooms and suites but they lack privacy as they are facing the reception and restaurant building across the river.
Originally Posted by KI-NRT
(Post 34783506)
If it were me.... neither. Not sure what the rates are on the dates you're looking at, but Amantaka is much closer to the center of the action.
Amantaka is far from being among the best Aman properties in their portfolio, but La Residence Phuo Vhao was somewhat dark and depressing, and lacked the intimacy and privacy (similar to other Belmond properties in the region, including Governor's Residence in Yangon) and Rosewood is way too far - you won't get any sense of being in a very nice UNESCO town by staying there, IMO. |
Originally Posted by Xoud
(Post 34782524)
I'm planning a three-night stay in Luang Prabang, Laos next month. I'm torn between Rosewood (riverside room) and La Residence Phou Vao, a Belmond Hotel (Mountain View Junior suite). Below my initial assessment:
Rosewood: + Feels more luxurious (Bensley design) + More intimate (23 rooms vs. 32 at Belmond) - No gym Belmond: + Better facilities (the pool looks nicer, they have a fitness center) + Better view from the room (considering the room category I'm considering in both properties) - Online reviews not as good as those of Rosewood The location doesn't matter (both hotels have shuttles to the city and can plan my excursions). Any information to help me decide would be extremely appreciated. Thanks in advance. Belmond is up a hill and may not be so accessible if you like strolling out on a whim. Strolling toward the river is nice and relaxing. Amantaka is certainly nice and charming. Unless you insist on “Aman luxury” I would actually go for the former Azerai LP which is up the road from Amantaka - Avani Hotel LP ( I think ) . Has all the facilities incld a very nice pool. But unsure what it’s like under Avani . |
Originally Posted by bearbrick
(Post 34783908)
Rosewood is way out of the “centre” ( even w transport) and I am also wary of the so called Bensley design ( the disaster that’s Capella Ubud)
Belmond is up a hill and may not be so accessible if you like strolling out on a whim. Strolling toward the river is nice and relaxing. Amantaka is certainly nice and charming. Unless you insist on “Aman luxury” I would actually go for the former Azerai LP which is up the road from Amantaka - Avani Hotel LP ( I think ) . Has all the facilities incld a very nice pool. But unsure what it’s like under Avani . |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.