Milan luxury hotels
#91
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: BKK
Posts: 6,741
Four Seasons is my top choice. With Mauro Governato as GM, I see no need to look further as top notch service is assured.
Although under same ownership as FS, I have lost interest in MO. I will stay at FS and perhaps visit MO for a meal.
Although I have not stayed yet, I am more interested in Excelsior Gallia than PdS in that part of own.
Although under same ownership as FS, I have lost interest in MO. I will stay at FS and perhaps visit MO for a meal.
Although I have not stayed yet, I am more interested in Excelsior Gallia than PdS in that part of own.
#93
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
The PH Milan was surprisingly tired, both in the public spaces (I really didn't like the covered atrium lobby, which felt dated and claustrophobic) and rooms and suites (wow, many of the furnishings, fixtures, and finishes looked like they hadn't been changed since 2000...and it was more blatant in the suites!). It's overrated.
To be fair, the rooms and suites (but less so the public spaces) at the FS were just as disappointing.
And the Excelsior Gallia (category 6) requires fewer points than the PH Milan (category 7). So the points discussion IMO still favors EG. But I'd pay for the EG and wouldn't think of paying for the overrated and overpriced FS or PH. If I had to stay in the center, I'd prefer the FS. The PH is simply too overpriced and resting on past glory.
It's not just that people previously discussed how tired the PH and FS might be; it's that the EG hasn't had any mention here at all. Pretty sad when it obviously is as good or at least comparable as any of the others so often mentioned.
Last edited by bhrubin; Jul 4, 2017 at 11:04 pm
#94
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E75K, Amex Plat, NEXUS, Aman-user (not really a -junkie)
Posts: 1,721
My truth be told, MO Paris was lovely as was MO Milan. I am not sure why in thinking that one is beautiful, the other is not ?!
We are all drawn to different aspects of luxury hotels. When I planned my trip to Milan, MO was brand new so I wanted to try it out. My second choice would have been PH for location and the fact that I was Diamond at the time. I don't like SPG Hotels in general so probably never would have considered Excelsior. If I were to return to Milan today, I would book MO again without hesitation.
The best part about being a luxury traveller is doing as you wish and having your own opinion
We are all drawn to different aspects of luxury hotels. When I planned my trip to Milan, MO was brand new so I wanted to try it out. My second choice would have been PH for location and the fact that I was Diamond at the time. I don't like SPG Hotels in general so probably never would have considered Excelsior. If I were to return to Milan today, I would book MO again without hesitation.
The best part about being a luxury traveller is doing as you wish and having your own opinion
Last edited by xray; Jul 4, 2017 at 11:21 pm
#95
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,598
The PH Milan was surprisingly tired, both in the public spaces (I really didn't like the covered atrium lobby, which felt dated and claustrophobic) and rooms and suites (wow, many of the furnishings, fixtures, and finishes looked like they hadn't been changed since 2000...and it was more blatant in the suites!). It's overrated.
The biggest challenge of the Park Hyatt is the lack of daylight in 90% of the rooms and suites, it is so dark there. That's the reason I stayed 3 or 4 times but prefer Four Seasons these days. I cannot stand that. And service cannot be compared.
#96
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
Back in the day, Ciga Hotels had 3 hotels in Milan - Principe di Savoia, Excelsior Gallia and The Palace.
Principe di Savoia was seen as the high-end option, whilst The Palace was more of a business hotel and the Gallia was a long-stay all-suite property, considered at the time to be the lower-end option. All were clustered in the same square, within waling distance of each other.
When Ciga broke up, ITT Sheraton took over, then Starwood Luxury Collection, then Dorchester took over Principe di Savoia and the remaining two hotels in that square stayed with Starwood.
I agree that Excelsior Gallia is more of a good 4-star.
Principe di Savoia was seen as the high-end option, whilst The Palace was more of a business hotel and the Gallia was a long-stay all-suite property, considered at the time to be the lower-end option. All were clustered in the same square, within waling distance of each other.
When Ciga broke up, ITT Sheraton took over, then Starwood Luxury Collection, then Dorchester took over Principe di Savoia and the remaining two hotels in that square stayed with Starwood.
I agree that Excelsior Gallia is more of a good 4-star.
#97
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
odd that gallia and eden rome were le (royal) meridien & LHW
gallia probably sold 2007, looking at starwood forum thread
perhaps ITT/starwood sold some CIGA hotels in 1990s/2000s
le meridien was first acquired by forte, which also bid on CIGA
gallia probably sold 2007, looking at starwood forum thread
perhaps ITT/starwood sold some CIGA hotels in 1990s/2000s
le meridien was first acquired by forte, which also bid on CIGA
Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Jul 5, 2017 at 9:39 am
#99
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
Le Meurice used to be Ciga - now Dorchester. The 3 resorts in Sardinia are now Cala di Volpe (Luxury Collection), Hotel Pitrizza (Luxury Collection) and Hotel Porto Cervo (now Sheraton).
In Venice, there was Hotel Danieli, Gritti Palace, Hotel des Bains (Lido) and Excelsior Lido (both Lido hotels privately owned, although des Bains is closed, I believe).
Seville - Hotel Alfonso XIII - Luxury Collection.
Etc etc
#100
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Here there and everywhere
Posts: 6,303
Here's a potted history of what happened with Ciga, under the Aga Khan -
http://content.time.com/time/magazin...161846,00.html
http://www.starwoodhotels.com/luxury...language=en_US
http://content.time.com/time/magazin...161846,00.html
http://www.starwoodhotels.com/luxury...language=en_US
#101
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,423
Back in the day, Ciga Hotels had 3 hotels in Milan - Principe di Savoia, Excelsior Gallia and The Palace.
Principe di Savoia was seen as the high-end option, whilst The Palace was more of a business hotel and the Gallia was a long-stay all-suite property, considered at the time to be the lower-end option. All were clustered in the same square, within waling distance of each other.
When Ciga broke up, ITT Sheraton took over, then Starwood Luxury Collection, then Dorchester took over Principe di Savoia and the remaining two hotels in that square stayed with Starwood.
I agree that Excelsior Gallia is more of a good 4-star.
Principe di Savoia was seen as the high-end option, whilst The Palace was more of a business hotel and the Gallia was a long-stay all-suite property, considered at the time to be the lower-end option. All were clustered in the same square, within waling distance of each other.
When Ciga broke up, ITT Sheraton took over, then Starwood Luxury Collection, then Dorchester took over Principe di Savoia and the remaining two hotels in that square stayed with Starwood.
I agree that Excelsior Gallia is more of a good 4-star.
When I visited there were not enough check in people and there were a few lines. As it was still before noon and rooms weren't ready there seemed to be a lot of guests in the lobby waiting for their rooms.
As an aside, I highly recommend day trips to Torino, Pavia, Bergamo and Stresa on Lake Maggiore. I actually like LM better than Como.
#102
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
I am disappointed by the so-called reviews from so many herein about a hotel at which no one has stayed or even really investigated beyond the lobby! I'm not sure I've experienced this level of prejudice in the Luxury Forum in some time.
The furnishings at the Excelsior Gallia are all bespoke by local Milanese designers, despite the erroneous statements made herein. Anyone claiming the furnishings or decor at the EG is somehow cheap or unworthy of a 5 star hotel is either confused or mistaken...or showing prejudice. The appointments at the EG were often (but not always) much nicer than those at either of the PH or FS.
The lobby of the Excelsior Gallia is tremendously beautiful, an Art Deco masterpiece. There is nothing 4 star about it. That's why all of the appropriate ratings groups consider the EG to be a 5 star property. That's why Forbes puts the EG in the same 4 star classification as all of the other luxury hotels discussed herein with the sole exception of the 5 star MO Milan. Yet the Gallia is somehow subpar in this thread? I don't think so.
The rooms and suites at the Excelsior Gallia are spectacularly beautiful. If you like the PH's or MO's modern take on design, and can't admit that the EG knocks the PH out of the water and is comparably beautiful with the MO, then there's something wrong. If you like the FS's more traditional take on design and can't admit that the FS is still tired and needs refurbishment, then there's something wrong again.
Food and beverage at the EG was outstanding. It compares very favorably with that of the FS, where we also had a lovely lunch. Those were slightly better than the lunch I had at the MO. I did not eat at the PH.
The lobby and reception desk of the PH Milan was slammed at about 10:30 am when I visited, but that has nothing to do with my perspective on the hotel. That had nothing to do with the tired furnishings in all categories of rooms, and in the multiple categories of suites that I visited. Those have been discussed at length here in this thread...so I'm not sure why so many are troubled by my repeating what is obviously true. The lobby of the PH is not nearly as beautiful (nor open) as that the EG. I don't care if you love Tuttle. His design here is dated.
The lobby of the FS Milan was busy around 1:00 pm when I visited, but that has nothing to do with my perspective on the hotel. The check in desk had a line, too, but that didn't make me think one way or another of the service level. Those had nothing to do with the tired decor in rooms and suites, or the odd layout in so many suites. Those also have been discussed at length in this thread. The lobby of the FS is beautiful. But so is that of the EG.
I've conceded that there was a slightly higher service standard at the PH and FS (but not the MO) compared to what I experienced at the Excelsior Gallia. But no one seems willing to admit what the staffs at the PH, FS, and MO Milan all readily admitted to me--that the Excelsior Hotel Gallia is among the most beautiful or perhaps the most beautiful, in the city.
Obviously, the location of the hotels is another story. If you want a more central hotel, the EG and several of the other top hotels are not going to be for you. But that doesn't mean they aren't 5 star. If you want a hotel with easy transport options, however, the EG is among the best.
Anyone prescribing that the EG is only 2 yrs old as an excuse for any other sentiments is only making excuses to not include the Gallia in the discussion.
I question the judgment of anyone who hasn't visited a hotel and critiques or rejects its quality based solely on the management group. if that were true, then so many should also be rejecting the MO Milan since it's been open long enough that its service slide should be comparable to those of MOS almost everywhere else but Bangkok. I actually didn't experience good service at the MO Milan when I visited. I had no such issue when I visited the PH or FS.
The apparent prejudice against the Excelsior Gallia is unfortunate for this forum...but it's prejudice nonetheless. I hope that by pointing out the unfortunate prejudice, it may cease or be mitigated.
The furnishings at the Excelsior Gallia are all bespoke by local Milanese designers, despite the erroneous statements made herein. Anyone claiming the furnishings or decor at the EG is somehow cheap or unworthy of a 5 star hotel is either confused or mistaken...or showing prejudice. The appointments at the EG were often (but not always) much nicer than those at either of the PH or FS.
The lobby of the Excelsior Gallia is tremendously beautiful, an Art Deco masterpiece. There is nothing 4 star about it. That's why all of the appropriate ratings groups consider the EG to be a 5 star property. That's why Forbes puts the EG in the same 4 star classification as all of the other luxury hotels discussed herein with the sole exception of the 5 star MO Milan. Yet the Gallia is somehow subpar in this thread? I don't think so.
The rooms and suites at the Excelsior Gallia are spectacularly beautiful. If you like the PH's or MO's modern take on design, and can't admit that the EG knocks the PH out of the water and is comparably beautiful with the MO, then there's something wrong. If you like the FS's more traditional take on design and can't admit that the FS is still tired and needs refurbishment, then there's something wrong again.
Food and beverage at the EG was outstanding. It compares very favorably with that of the FS, where we also had a lovely lunch. Those were slightly better than the lunch I had at the MO. I did not eat at the PH.
The lobby and reception desk of the PH Milan was slammed at about 10:30 am when I visited, but that has nothing to do with my perspective on the hotel. That had nothing to do with the tired furnishings in all categories of rooms, and in the multiple categories of suites that I visited. Those have been discussed at length here in this thread...so I'm not sure why so many are troubled by my repeating what is obviously true. The lobby of the PH is not nearly as beautiful (nor open) as that the EG. I don't care if you love Tuttle. His design here is dated.
The lobby of the FS Milan was busy around 1:00 pm when I visited, but that has nothing to do with my perspective on the hotel. The check in desk had a line, too, but that didn't make me think one way or another of the service level. Those had nothing to do with the tired decor in rooms and suites, or the odd layout in so many suites. Those also have been discussed at length in this thread. The lobby of the FS is beautiful. But so is that of the EG.
I've conceded that there was a slightly higher service standard at the PH and FS (but not the MO) compared to what I experienced at the Excelsior Gallia. But no one seems willing to admit what the staffs at the PH, FS, and MO Milan all readily admitted to me--that the Excelsior Hotel Gallia is among the most beautiful or perhaps the most beautiful, in the city.
Obviously, the location of the hotels is another story. If you want a more central hotel, the EG and several of the other top hotels are not going to be for you. But that doesn't mean they aren't 5 star. If you want a hotel with easy transport options, however, the EG is among the best.
Anyone prescribing that the EG is only 2 yrs old as an excuse for any other sentiments is only making excuses to not include the Gallia in the discussion.
I question the judgment of anyone who hasn't visited a hotel and critiques or rejects its quality based solely on the management group. if that were true, then so many should also be rejecting the MO Milan since it's been open long enough that its service slide should be comparable to those of MOS almost everywhere else but Bangkok. I actually didn't experience good service at the MO Milan when I visited. I had no such issue when I visited the PH or FS.
The apparent prejudice against the Excelsior Gallia is unfortunate for this forum...but it's prejudice nonetheless. I hope that by pointing out the unfortunate prejudice, it may cease or be mitigated.
Last edited by bhrubin; Jul 6, 2017 at 3:45 pm
#103
Join Date: Sep 2010
Programs: Miles & More, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 75
During my last stay at PH in Milan Mr. Hamad Abdulla Al-Mulla, CEO and Board Member of Katara Hospitality (owners of Gallia) was staying there with his family. Apparently he is the regular guest there.
Lobby at Gallia remembers me more a generic shopping mall in Middle East than an "Art Deco masterpiece". Not my pair of shoes.
Lobby at Gallia remembers me more a generic shopping mall in Middle East than an "Art Deco masterpiece". Not my pair of shoes.
#104
During my last stay at PH in Milan Mr. Hamad Abdulla Al-Mulla, CEO and Board Member of Katara Hospitality (owners of Gallia) was staying there with his family. Apparently he is the regular guest there.
Lobby at Gallia remembers me more a generic shopping mall in Middle East than an "Art Deco masterpiece". Not my pair of shoes.
Lobby at Gallia remembers me more a generic shopping mall in Middle East than an "Art Deco masterpiece". Not my pair of shoes.
Why would the CEO/Board Member lodging at the Park Hyatt when the company owns the Excelsior Hotel Gallia, any background on this one?
Katara [Qatar] must have however spent lots of money and thought of how to re-position the Excelsior Hotel Gallia.
Fascinating that it's officially a 5 star, but some describe it as 4 star.
It's modern, stylish and different, at least on their website it feels/looks like a newly renovated 5 star hotel with ambition to be memorable and among the Milan's best. [In fact the hotel wants to be counted as one of the best in Milan as evidenced bellow]
So, interesting to know overall what the "forum think" as comparison [star rating] since the Excelsior Gallia is and should be indeed iconic.
“This has been one of the most prestigious hotels in Milan since it opened in 1932. Today, the new Excelsior Hotel Gallia embodies the city’s rich history, sophisticated style and vibrant energy.”
http://www.katarahospitality.com/pre...-gallia-milan/
Cheers & Safe Travels. ^
#105
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,598
What bothers me about E.G. are the unfortunate choices in terms of lighting. And in general, the property looks very cold and stark. Granted, it's all new and fresh, but it has that distinctive 'hotel' look, and by that I mean convention hotel. It's the materials, and how they are used. That undoubtedly a lot of funds went into the renovation is clear, but the outcome is not residential. And that's what many like -- a home away from home. In all of the pictures, the little touches are missing -- and those make the place feel warm and inviting. If I would see the pictures and not know the brand I would guess it could be a Meridien or a W hotel, but most definitely a 4* chain hotel.
Since you praise the hotel that much I will have a look on a future Milan visit.
Since you praise the hotel that much I will have a look on a future Milan visit.