NYC: Trump Soho, Gramercy, RC Battery Park, or London
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,092
NYC: Trump Soho, Gramercy, RC Battery Park, or London
Hello everyone,
I'm going to be in NYC for several days and looking for a new place to stay. I can get decent rates at the Trump SoHo, Gramercy, RC Battery Park and London. Any recs on which is the best one? I prefer the location of the Gramercy followed by Trump SoHo, but is one or two of these by far the best? From what I can get from a search, they all seem to have somewhat mixed reviews on here. Also, I don't know the boutique hotels in NYC, but if you have others recs, I'm open to them. Don't want too, too expensive.
Thanks!
I'm going to be in NYC for several days and looking for a new place to stay. I can get decent rates at the Trump SoHo, Gramercy, RC Battery Park and London. Any recs on which is the best one? I prefer the location of the Gramercy followed by Trump SoHo, but is one or two of these by far the best? From what I can get from a search, they all seem to have somewhat mixed reviews on here. Also, I don't know the boutique hotels in NYC, but if you have others recs, I'm open to them. Don't want too, too expensive.
Thanks!
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
Soho House remains my preferred option in NYC, but you need to be a certain sort of person to like it. Great rooftop pool.
What are the rates like at the new Conrad Battery Park for your dates? Still early days so may be cheap(ish) and rooms are huge for NYC.
View from the Wing blog is very positive about the Andaz 5th Avenue and this would let you use your Hyatt status, eg http://boardingarea.com/blogs/viewfr...l-in-new-york/
What are the rates like at the new Conrad Battery Park for your dates? Still early days so may be cheap(ish) and rooms are huge for NYC.
View from the Wing blog is very positive about the Andaz 5th Avenue and this would let you use your Hyatt status, eg http://boardingarea.com/blogs/viewfr...l-in-new-york/
#4
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
It can be pricey but should be along the lines with the hotels you have selected already. I really enjoy the Bowery Hotel. The rooms are not huge but they're quite nice. Have a more relaxed setting and the hotel service is great. Also the downstairs bar and restaurant are quite good. I live a few blocks away and whenever I organize conferences I get myself and the speakers rooms there. Also it's in a fun are surrounded by good eats and places to go out.
#5
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,854
....View from the Wing blog is very positive about the Andaz 5th Avenue and this would let you use your Hyatt status, eg http://boardingarea.com/blogs/viewfr...l-in-new-york/
Also, the London is not a luxury hotel.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,092
Thanks everybody. I looked at the recommended hotels, and they all look very nice. The Bowery actually looks like it would fit my needs pretty well.
However, I'm also curious if anyone has any opinions on Gramercy vs. Trump Soho. Both have FHR promotions running and they would be about $320 a night including amenities. Is one a better place?
However, I'm also curious if anyone has any opinions on Gramercy vs. Trump Soho. Both have FHR promotions running and they would be about $320 a night including amenities. Is one a better place?
#8
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
Well what are your needs?
Personally I like the Gramercy vs the Trump SOHO because of location. Service that I have experienced at each has been good but I was not a guest. Calling down for a bottle of bourbon/snack during a meeting was done so easily and quickly. I'm not a fan of SOHO but Gramercy can be boring to some if you don't know where to go. Which is why I say Bowery.
Personally I like the Gramercy vs the Trump SOHO because of location. Service that I have experienced at each has been good but I was not a guest. Calling down for a bottle of bourbon/snack during a meeting was done so easily and quickly. I'm not a fan of SOHO but Gramercy can be boring to some if you don't know where to go. Which is why I say Bowery.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
These properties are in very different neighborhoods even though they're all Loweer Manhattan and their styles are different. I wouldn't call them all (Trump SOHO, RC) boutique hotels at all.
I would add to the list W Union Square and W Downtown. Of the two, the first is less like the typical W with lighter colors and some rooms (standard SPG Plat upgrade to corner when suites aren't available as usual) that are large for NYC.
I would add to the list W Union Square and W Downtown. Of the two, the first is less like the typical W with lighter colors and some rooms (standard SPG Plat upgrade to corner when suites aren't available as usual) that are large for NYC.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,092
Well what are your needs?
Personally I like the Gramercy vs the Trump SOHO because of location. Service that I have experienced at each has been good but I was not a guest. Calling down for a bottle of bourbon/snack during a meeting was done so easily and quickly. I'm not a fan of SOHO but Gramercy can be boring to some if you don't know where to go. Which is why I say Bowery.
Personally I like the Gramercy vs the Trump SOHO because of location. Service that I have experienced at each has been good but I was not a guest. Calling down for a bottle of bourbon/snack during a meeting was done so easily and quickly. I'm not a fan of SOHO but Gramercy can be boring to some if you don't know where to go. Which is why I say Bowery.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
Gramercy gets my vote out of the two. Trump SOHO is a larger hotel with not as intimate of an area and you can get a cab or subway to other areas while you reexplore.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT USA
Programs: AA PLT+2MM / DL DM+1MM / A3 *G / Fairmont LT Plat / Ritz Gold / SPG Gold
Posts: 4,077
The GPH is quite nice (my wife has stayed a number of times), but lacks some of the features a new hotel like the Trump property. I've stayed at the RC-battery park a number of times. I enjoy the Statue of Liberty views, but you're in a fairly remote corner of the city when you stay there...not in the action. (Same would be said of the Conrad.)
The London NYC is the old Rihga Royal hotel. The building was designed in the late 80s (perhaps early 90s) to be apartments, but part way through construction plans changed and it was developed as a hotel. As a result, it is missing some things you'd expect to find in a hotel. Moreover, it is in a spot that I'd describe as more corporate than local NYC.
Also note that the Conrad is sort of the Goldman dorms. It is adjacent to GS headquarters and is owned by Goldman. It was formerly an Embassy Suites hotel.
#15
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Washington, D.C. Metro
Programs: AA EXP | UA Million Miler Gold (former decade-long 1K) | SPG Plat | Hyatt Plat | Avis Chairman
Posts: 822
A to the RC Battery Park. On two recent stays, indifferent staff, sterile rooms, and awful food in the hotel restaurant. I personally do not plan to return. OTOH, the RC Central Park is exceptional (at a significant cost premium).
Second the vote a couple posts up about the W Union Square for mid-range lux accommodations, if you don't need to be in mid-town.
Second the vote a couple posts up about the W Union Square for mid-range lux accommodations, if you don't need to be in mid-town.