Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

Luxury Hotels In New York

Luxury Hotels In New York

Old May 5, 13, 4:47 am
  #91  
Four Seasons 5+ BadgeSPG 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Germany
Programs: Some
Posts: 8,758
Originally Posted by subhashkashi View Post
Here is the list of Best Luxury Hotels in New York
Cool List! To be honest, like MSPeconomist I would be interested how this list came together. Canīt see any pattern.
offerendum is offline  
Old May 5, 13, 5:16 am
  #92  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: BKK
Posts: 6,706
Originally Posted by offerendum View Post
Cool List! To be honest, like MSPeconomist I would be interested how this list came together. Canīt see any pattern.
I hope you are being sarcastic here but am not sure. That list is utterly worthless. It contains a few of the city's top hotels, but omits many more. At the same time it includes properties that most would consider to be four star, if that.

It's a laugh that Four Seasons is placed near the bottom of the list, well below Ws and other awful hotels.
MikeFromTokyo is offline  
Old May 5, 13, 5:34 am
  #93  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: BKK
Posts: 6,706
Originally Posted by tmr10001 View Post
I believe the majority of the above list would not be considered luxury hotels in New York. I would consider the Four Seasons, Mandarin Oriental and the Mark to be luxury.. everything else on this list is not luxury.
The Mercer is the only other choice that qualifies as high-end.

The "list" omits the Lowell, the Greenwich, Crosby Street Hotel, The Peninsula, The Pierre, Ritz-Carlton Central Park, The Carlyle, Hotel Plaza Athénée, and perhaps others.

Last edited by MikeFromTokyo; May 5, 13 at 11:43 am
MikeFromTokyo is offline  
Old May 5, 13, 12:20 pm
  #94  
SPG 5+ BadgeFour Seasons 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Germany
Programs: Some
Posts: 8,758
Originally Posted by MikeFromTokyo View Post
I hope you are being sarcastic here but am not sure.
Of course it was (very angry look), especially as I coudnīt and canīt imagain, that the numbers mean a ranking. Itīs like: Hey poor guy! So sorry for you staying at Four Seasons - greating from the Barcley
offerendum is offline  
Old May 5, 13, 5:00 pm
  #95  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CDG, SFO
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by offerendum View Post
Of course it was (very angry look), especially as I coudnīt and canīt imagain, that the numbers mean a ranking. Itīs like: Hey poor guy! So sorry for you staying at Four Seasons - greating from the Barcley

Though I would clearly stay away from the FS unless CP view / suite. Booked an entry level room there two years ago for the NY marathon and hardware was a shame. Old, in dire need of renovation and the room felt empty. Service was however excellent, as expected with Four Seasons, but spending rack rate for this kind of hardware when you've got so many good options nearby ... Any idea if they intend to do a refurb ?
vincentb89 is offline  
Old May 6, 13, 7:40 am
  #96  
SPG 5+ BadgeFour Seasons 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Germany
Programs: Some
Posts: 8,758
Originally Posted by vincentb89 View Post

Though I would clearly stay away from the FS unless CP view / suite. Booked an entry level room there two years ago for the NY marathon and hardware was a shame. Old, in dire need of renovation and the room felt empty. Service was however excellent, as expected with Four Seasons, but spending rack rate for this kind of hardware when you've got so many good options nearby ... Any idea if they intend to do a refurb ?
I never stayed at FS New York, but from pictures I donīt find the rooms/ suites really ultra-luxury. If I planed our next trip to NY and discussed the options with my wife she said it looked like an Intercontinental Perhaps a little hard (especially by New York Intercontinental standrds), but I donīt think I will try the FS very soon.

P.S. I took the FS for my poast, because it was so deep ranked in this now removed list...
offerendum is offline  
Old May 6, 13, 8:19 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: BKK
Posts: 6,706
Originally Posted by offerendum View Post
I never stayed at FS New York, but from pictures I donīt find the rooms/ suites really ultra-luxury. If I planed our next trip to NY and discussed the options with my wife she said it looked like an Intercontinental Perhaps a little hard (especially by New York Intercontinental standrds), but I donīt think I will try the FS very soon.

P.S. I took the FS for my poast, because it was so deep ranked in this now removed list...
IMO FS New York is only a good choice at the level of Executive Suite or above.
The tower rooms with city or park view are okay for single occupancy or if one does not mind having less space.

I am very interested in the one bedroom studio suite category (only two in the hotel IIRC). The views from the highest floors must be amazing.

Last edited by MikeFromTokyo; May 6, 13 at 7:53 pm
MikeFromTokyo is offline  
Old May 7, 13, 9:00 am
  #98  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,161
Originally Posted by MikeFromTokyo View Post
IMO FS New York is only a good choice at the level of Executive Suite or above.
The tower rooms with city or park view are okay for single occupancy or if one does not mind having less space.

I am very interested in the one bedroom studio suite category (only two in the hotel IIRC). The views from the highest floors must be amazing.
I have stayed in the standard rooms and they are OK and definitely the FS NY has some of the best service in New York.

If you want space and the best park views- and can bear with- the Trump wins on both categories by a long shot: Large 1 bedroom or 2 bedrooms suites with stunning views of CP.
TRAVELSIG is offline  
Old May 7, 13, 10:54 am
  #99  
SPG 5+ BadgeFour Seasons 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Germany
Programs: Some
Posts: 8,758
Originally Posted by TRAVELSIG View Post
I have stayed in the standard rooms and they are OK and definitely the FS NY has some of the best service in New York.

If you want space and the best park views- and can bear with- the Trump wins on both categories by a long shot: Large 1 bedroom or 2 bedrooms suites with stunning views of CP.
But is service worth to pay the double price compared to other hotels with better rooms and a "normal" (in relation to itīs category) service?

P.S. OK is not enough in my eyes
offerendum is offline  
Old May 7, 13, 11:57 am
  #100  
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,278
On my one stay at the FS NY, I didn't experience that "best service in NY," unless every other NY hotel makes takes more than 20 minutes at the front desk just to check in. I also enjoyed the doormen watching me lug my suitcase up the steps from the entrance to lobby level and then being absent every other time I entered or exited for the rest of my stay. Requests from my room also took forever.

But then, I was a nobody staying in an entry level room, so they probably marked me with UV-visible ink so they could be sure to treat me poorly.

I've had much better luck at the Trump (despite the name) although even then the service is not close to Asian hotel standards.
RichardInSF is offline  
Old May 7, 13, 8:17 pm
  #101  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 126
I think the Mark and the MO are the best properties in NYC.
Hotelsforlife is offline  
Old May 7, 13, 9:22 pm
  #102  
Aman 10+ BadgeMandarin Oriental Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Enroute to ? & likely flying in ' A ':)
Programs: TPPS, UA, EK ...; Marriott BONVOY , HH, GP, GC..
Posts: 2,972
Originally Posted by Hotelsforlife View Post
I think the Mark and the MO are the best properties in NYC.
Think so too . But have not stayed at The Mark after refurbishment . Hope I will like it just as much , service as well
FlyerEC is online now  
Old May 7, 13, 9:55 pm
  #103  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 324
If I had to rank NYC properties...

1. FS NY (Tower Park View Room or Suite)
2. RC CP Club Level with CP View
3. St Regis NYC
4. MO NY (However, with the hard beds and the so so service I only go here at last resort)
Blackbook is offline  
Old May 13, 13, 11:32 am
  #104  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 104
The Surrey or The Plaza?

Hi all,

I understand that neither of these seem to be at the top of the recommended list, however places such as St Regis / RC
/ Peninsula / The Mark are out of our budget and so not feasible.

I managed to get a good rate at The Surrey (Grand Deluxe Salon) which I've confirmed for 5 nights, the price has now gone up by close to 25%. It's fully refundable.

I was just looking up hotels for some friends and found a deeply discounted rate for The Plaza (entry level Plaza King room) which is comparable in price to
The Surrey for the 5 night stay. Other booking sites including
directly with the hotel is considerably more expensive.

Would appreciate any thoughts as to comparisons
Between The Surrey and Plaza? Would you guys cancel and
book with The Plaza, or should I stick to what I've got?

Because its such a relatively good rate for the plaza it's tempting to go there (previously out of price range), but I've read some negative things on here re: the Plaza.

Thanks for any advice!
Arrow29 is offline  
Old May 13, 13, 12:56 pm
  #105  
ABG
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Programs: Virtuoso TA, Four Seasons Pref Partner, Rosewood Elite TA, Ritz Carlton STARS TA
Posts: 4,272
The location of the Plaza is mad house..... Stick with Surrey and enjoy the roof top deck
ABG is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: