Further "improvement" of HON Circle Services
#16
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FRA
Programs: LH, Avis, Hyatt, ...
Posts: 4,213
Anyway, I try to explain again: With all the current construction going on at FRA the logistics to manage 16 cars versus 4 cars to a plane seems to be almost impossible. Not to speak about the limited 1 or 2 dedicated parking lots per gate for those cars. Given the time a driver needs to bring his pax into the plane the first S-Type or Cayenne would have to leave the FCT more than 60 min before departure in order to bring all F pax on time on board.
#17
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold
Posts: 6,913
Well, IMHO you will be enormously disappointed if you subscribe to a logic of "investment" when it comes to elite status in FFPs. The only case you will not be let down is when you get status as a result of your necessary (business, vacation, etc.) flight activity. That is, when you have invested zip (as in zero) in terms of money, time, etc. in attaining your status.
[…]
[…]
Anyway, I try to explain again: With all the current construction going on at FRA the logistics to manage 16 cars versus 4 cars to a plane seems to be almost impossible. Not to speak about the limited 1 or 2 dedicated parking lots per gate for those cars. Given the time a driver needs to bring his pax into the plane the first S-Type or Cayenne would have to leave the FCT more than 60 min before departure in order to bring all F pax on time on board.
Finally it kind of surprises me that a 5 or 10 min car ride gets more important than any rational or ecological argument.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Sight For Roll Eyes
Programs: :enrolleyes:+, :drôleyes:
Posts: 5,461
Originally Posted by totti
^Great post. I agree with you.
Well, some people (maybe everybody here, at some point) have chosen LH/*A over some competitor because of the perks that come with status and loyalty. I don't really think it's odd to think of that as an investment. Whether the return to that investment (however small) is worth it is in the eye of the receiver.
Because the factor "ego" is minimally involved when it comes to champagne. @:-)
Last edited by andre1970; Nov 26, 2008 at 5:34 am
#19
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,171
What can be done: open threads with different topics, perhaps?
#20
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,069
Because the factor "ego" is minimally involved when it comes to champagne. @:-)
Basic problem is there are way to many HON's.
LH is far to generous when dishing out miles on intra European
flights. Up the ante!!!!
#21
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FRA
Programs: LH, Avis, Hyatt, ...
Posts: 4,213
I agree with the first part of your explanation. The last sentence isn't a useful argument though because it is rather limited. LH could simply appoint more drivers and get more cars to drive all pax out there. This won't be possible because of what you pointed out in the first part. So in the end you are absolutely right but the last statement reads as an argument itself and as such it doesn't withstand criticism.
#22
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FRA
Programs: LH, Avis, Hyatt, ...
Posts: 4,213
If so, this "problem" will be automatically reduced by (a) less flying due to current economy and (b) recent major changes to the PPB program.
But I don't agree. The number is only significantly higher than anticipated due to the LX take over. The over-crowding FCT at FRA is mainly caused, because the usage of the first class facilities is currently relatively unbalanced. This should come to an end after opening the new B FCL and providing the ego-trip in the cars as well.
#23
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I´m on a road to nowhere
Programs: If I don´t have it, I don´t need it!
Posts: 758
No. More cars don't work IMHO. Space for parking is very limited and parking time for the cars is given by the fact, that the drivers must bring his pax to the plane. While most gates allow for about 3 cars gate A55 is a perfect example of having only 2 parking spaces for cars and one is often even occupied. The driver needs at least 5 minutes to bring the pax up and be back down. So 16 cars on 2 spots is 40 minutes at least. This would mean to start the first car transfer about 60 minutes before departure. I could see the next ton of threads coming with people complaining about the early transfer. Right?
#24
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold
Posts: 6,913
No. More cars don't work IMHO. Space for parking is very limited and parking time for the cars is given by the fact, that the drivers must bring his pax to the plane. While most gates allow for about 3 cars gate A55 is a perfect example of having only 2 parking spaces for cars and one is often even occupied. The driver needs at least 5 minutes to bring the pax up and be back down. So 16 cars on 2 spots is 40 minutes at least. This would mean to start the first car transfer about 60 minutes before departure. I could see the next ton of threads coming with people complaining about the early transfer. Right?
#25
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: EDI, CGN, NYC
Programs: LH-SEN, DL-Platinum
Posts: 973
Both issues seem preposterous to worry about to those of us who are riding further back in the plane. Both are issues that have nothing to do with moving the passenger from point A to point B. Both are arguably services that people have paid for, either in the short term or long term.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
Programs: LH HON, BA Gold, EK Gold
Posts: 14,505
I have nothing against a minibus ride to the plane. However, last time they bused me, LH packed 6 of us in the minivan. (5 in the back and one in the front seat). This was actually quite uncomfortable, especially for the poor guy stuck in the middle seat in the back .
IMHO 4 pax per van is ok, 6 isn't ...
IMHO 4 pax per van is ok, 6 isn't ...
#27
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A Sight For Roll Eyes
Programs: :enrolleyes:+, :drôleyes:
Posts: 5,461
Originally Posted by SleepOverGreenland
Anyway, I try to explain again: With all the current construction going on at FRA the logistics to manage 16 cars versus 4 cars to a plane seems to be almost impossible. [...] Given the time a driver needs to bring his pax into the plane the first S-Type or Cayenne would have to leave the FCT more than 60 min before departure in order to bring all F pax on time on board.
I agree with the first part of your explanation. The last sentence isn't a useful argument though because it is rather limited. LH could simply appoint more drivers and get more cars to drive all pax out there. This won't be possible because of what you pointed out in the first part.
If your first sentence ("With all the current construction going on at FRA the logistics to manage 16 cars versus 4 cars to a plane seems to be almost impossible.") is true, then the second is redundant in the sense that it doesn't add any new information to your main argument (that "it is not possible/feasible to shuttle everyone individually in reasonable times...") since its negation (i.e., "it is possible to shuttle each pax individually on the plane, e.g., during the last 20 minutes") is already ruled out by your first sentence.
If OTOH your claim Re: logistics restrictions is false, then the "problem" in your second statement can be obviously overcome by hiring more people (which would be possible thanks to the assumed invalidity of your first statement). So, again it is redundant.
If LH Marketing start writing in their HON/FCT brochures BS like: "Limousine Pooling! Green Luxury! Save the environment by sharing a ride to the plane and gain some karma!", I'm confident the Whole Foods guys, those who buy free-trade coffee and munch home-made granola layered with seasonal fruit and non-fat yogurt for breakfast at their local indy café will definitely be happy to oblige...The rest, will just follow!
#28
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,373
No. More cars don't work IMHO. Space for parking is very limited and parking time for the cars is given by the fact, that the drivers must bring his pax to the plane. While most gates allow for about 3 cars gate A55 is a perfect example of having only 2 parking spaces for cars and one is often even occupied. The driver needs at least 5 minutes to bring the pax up and be back down. So 16 cars on 2 spots is 40 minutes at least. This would mean to start the first car transfer about 60 minutes before departure. I could see the next ton of threads coming with people complaining about the early transfer. Right?
What a brilliant plan. @:-)
#29
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,063
I would still prefer the fully individualised rides on a mountain bike. My fear is that it will only be available for HON+. This would also solve the parking space problem mentionned above. Sucessful completion of your fist bike ride will trigger off supply of a personalised airport lay-out map for the next rides
How do you get to HON+? Second time refusal to ride in the van
How do you get to HON+? Second time refusal to ride in the van
#30
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MAD
Programs: UA, US, AA, Hilton, Marriott, Hyatt
Posts: 374
The handover ritual by the driver at door of the plane is a waste of time. Waiting for the driver to be checked with the wand before he can enter the jetway, etc. It adds fuss, not value.