Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LH FCT/FCL lounge not accessible with *A F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2008, 4:32 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Arrow LH FCT/FCL lounge not accessible with *A F

Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
I am really hoping for nicer lounges in FRA but I do not support the trend to make only basic lounges available to *G and leave the top lounges to each airlines own frequent flyers.
i am completely supporting this trend! the LH business lounges are perfectly adequate for *G, especially if you compare them with other airlines offerings in *G lounges. SK, LX, UA, US, AC, NH, they all offer not more (sometimes even less) in their *G lounges. TG and SQ are sometimes better, but do also restrict their top lounges to their own F flyers or top status holders.

C lounges for *G and *A C flyers
SEN lounges for SENs and *A F flyers
HON lounges for HONs and LH/LX F flyers

i'd rather have that sooner than later...
sentom is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008, 5:31 am
  #2  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,512
Originally Posted by sentom
the LH business lounges are perfectly adequate for *G, especially if you compare them with other airlines offerings in *G lounges. SK, LX, UA, US, AC, NH, they all offer not more (sometimes even less) in their *G lounges.
I entirely agree with you which pax should be able to use which LH lounge, but the NH *G lounge at NRT has free wifi available to anybody and a better selection of food than LH business lounges. RCC at NRT also has free wifi. Both have plenty of seating - at least when I was there.

Last edited by NewbieRunner; Mar 20, 2008 at 5:36 am
NewbieRunner is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008, 9:10 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by NewbieRunner
I entirely agree with you which pax should be able to use which LH lounge, but the NH *G lounge at NRT has free wifi available to anybody and a better selection of food than LH business lounges. RCC at NRT also has free wifi. Both have plenty of seating - at least when I was there.
you are of course right, there is certainly good ones around. but unlike many of our frequent traveling friends, i dont think that a lounge is great just because its big (SFO RCC and SIN SKL come to mind), it of course helps if there are seats available , but pay for drinks in the one and absolutely no daylight in the other? the free wifi is an issue though.
sentom is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008, 9:50 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by sentom
i am completely supporting this trend! the LH business lounges are perfectly adequate for *G, especially if you compare them with other airlines offerings in *G lounges. SK, LX, UA, US, AC, NH, they all offer not more (sometimes even less) in their *G lounges. TG and SQ are sometimes better, but do also restrict their top lounges to their own F flyers or top status holders.

C lounges for *G and *A C flyers
SEN lounges for SENs and *A F flyers
HON lounges for HONs and LH/LX F flyers

i'd rather have that sooner than later...
Your opinion is based on lots of *A flying. What you see in FRA etc is the following: Overcrowded SEN lounges because of too many SENs and *G. So your solution is the easy way out (and most probably what LH will do). Just kick people out of the SEN lounges.

I agree with you that something needs to be done, but rather than reducing demand (=reducing eligible people) I favour a different approach.

Most of my flying is on oneworld and this gives you a different solution: Build FCL big enough to accommodate all *G.

CX, BA and QF show that this is possible. Sure, you need to triple the current lounge space and convert them into something far nicer than a SEN lounge, but it is possible. You can build lounges with cabanas, shower rooms, restaurants, quite rooms, spa, library etc big enough to accommodate all top tier frequent flyers of your alliance.

If each airline is now going back to cut the alliance benefits then the alliance becomes worthless and LH as the main *A airline shouldn't go down that route.

Improve the service and increase supply rather than decrease demand artificially. And if you want to decrease demand, then there is another way: Make Star Gold harder to get. The top status of an alliance should get you access to the top facilities of that alliance.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2008, 2:00 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
Most of my flying is on oneworld and this gives you a different solution: Build FCL big enough to accommodate all *G.
while this is a nice thought, where is the space in FRA for instance to do build lounges with three times the space?
sentom is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2008, 3:31 am
  #6  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by sentom
while this is a nice thought, where is the space in FRA for instance to do build lounges with three times the space?
You can always build higher. QF basically put an extra floor ontop of SYD airport to accommodate the F lounge.
But FRA is tight and all of this is not going to happen so I will continue to sit in SEN lounges of mediocre quality.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2008, 4:02 am
  #7  
hch
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: INN
Posts: 2,907
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
You can always build higher. QF basically put an extra floor ontop of SYD airport to accommodate the F lounge.
But FRA is tight and all of this is not going to happen so I will continue to sit in SEN lounges of mediocre quality.
Well, in case you haven't read the previous posts in the threads that's kindof exactly what's happening here. Fraport/LH is rebuilding most of FRA T1 (except for the existing A gates and the B non-schengen gates) to have a new level ontop of the existing terminal which is almost exclusively lounges, with the added benefit of also directly boarding from that level, be that through the upper jet-bridge to an A380 or via an escalator to the normal jet-bridge.

Last edited by hch; Mar 21, 2008 at 4:56 am Reason: add missing g
hch is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2008, 4:34 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAN and LON
Programs: Mucci, BAEC LT Gold, HH Dia, MR LT Plat, IHG Diamond Amb, Amex Plat
Posts: 13,771
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer

Most of my flying is on oneworld and this gives you a different solution: Build FCL big enough to accommodate all *G.

CX, BA and QF show that this is possible.
BA do not allow access to their "real" F lounge to OW F PAX and OW Emeralds. The Concorde Room at LHR T4 is open only to BA and QF F class ticket holders and to those who hold the rough equivalent of HON status with BA.

Following the move to LHR T5 only BA F PAX and uber status holders will have access to the Concorde Room, this is very like LH's FCT/FCL concept.

Admittedly other OW carriers do not follow the same pattern but none of the other OW carriers have 3 different lounge tiers AFAIK.
Land-of-Miles is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2008, 6:22 am
  #9  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by Land-of-Miles
BA do not allow access to their "real" F lounge to OW F PAX and OW Emeralds. The Concorde Room at LHR T4 is open only to BA and QF F class ticket holders and to those who hold the rough equivalent of HON status with BA.

Following the move to LHR T5 only BA F PAX and uber status holders will have access to the Concorde Room, this is very like LH's FCT/FCL concept.

Admittedly other OW carriers do not follow the same pattern but none of the other OW carriers have 3 different lounge tiers AFAIK.
I am not opposed to airlines having some special facilities for their top customers (like the Concord Room or the LH FCT). BTW, also QF Chairmans Lounge have access to the Concord Room irrespective of class of travel. And QF also has a special lounge only for Chairmans Club.

But the BA F lounge is a proper F lounge. Even more so in T5. Full sit down dining, lots of workstations, free Wifi, Champagne Bar etc. This compares to the LH F lounges but is accessible for OW Emeralds.

But I guess LH is only building bigger SEN lounges which don't even compare to a Qantas Club in Brisbane of Hobart.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2008, 9:52 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BSL
Programs: LH/LX
Posts: 517
Arrow LH FCT/FCL lounge not accessible with *A F

Originally Posted by You want to go where?
For the person who asked whether they should come to the C terminal or go to the FCT:
Unless you are an airport junkie who is curious about their new setup and the way they are dealing with A380s, I would urge you to use the FCT. While the new setup is nice, it in no way compares to the offerings of the FCT. I am sorry that I didn't pay attention to whether there is an FCL in this part of the terminal.
Thanks for your answer. I don't think there is a FCL, will therefore head for the FCT.
Hennessy is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2008, 8:20 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
Originally Posted by sentom
TG and SQ are sometimes better, but do also restrict their top lounges to their own F flyers or top status holders.

C lounges for *G and *A C flyers
SEN lounges for SENs and *A F flyers
HON lounges for HONs and LH/LX F flyers

i'd rather have that sooner than later...
You are flat out wrong.

Any passenger departing from BKK on a Star Alliance flight in F is permitted access to the TG F lounge. Same thing with SQ at SIN.

The ONLY Star carrier violating this Star Alliance rule is LH. PERIOD.

If LH wants to play its own game with lounge access, it should leave Star and joing One World where that kind of crap goes on. Until then, LH should follow the rules it agreed to when joining the Star Alliance.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2008, 1:08 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
Any passenger departing from BKK on a Star Alliance flight in F is permitted access to the TG F lounge. Same thing with SQ at SIN.
TG? F lounge you can use, but not the spa for instance, so TOP product, only for TG F flyers.

SQ, its completley new to me that ALL *A F pax can use the SKL. as far as i know its only SQ and LH pax who use it. but i might be wrong, it doesnt matter too much since i personally think the SKL in SIN is quiet crappy anyway. definitely no comparison to LHs offer...


Originally Posted by Always Flyin
The ONLY Star carrier violating this Star Alliance rule is LH. PERIOD.
LOL! since you are SQPPS5, i didnt expect anything other answer!
sentom is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2008, 2:17 pm
  #13  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Originally Posted by sentom
TG? F lounge you can use, but not the spa for instance, so TOP product, only for TG F flyers.
A spa is not a lounge. Apples and oranges comparison.

Originally Posted by sentom
SQ, its completley new to me that ALL *A F pax can use the SKL. as far as i know its only SQ and LH pax who use it.
That has always been the case that SQ F lounge is available to all *A F, ever since SQ joined *A.

Perhaps you are getting confused with the SIN C lounge not being a *G lounge but instead there is special *G lounge (SATS in T2 and KF Gold in T3)?
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2008, 9:04 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SZG
Posts: 3,936
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
Perhaps you are getting confused with the SIN C lounge not being a *G lounge but instead there is special *G lounge (SATS in T2 and KF Gold in T3)?
yes, i was under the impression that the same goes for the F section, but i didnt know since i was always on either on LH F or SQ F
sentom is offline  
Old Apr 10, 2008, 8:22 pm
  #15  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Aman Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
Originally Posted by Always Flyin
You are flat out wrong.

Any passenger departing from BKK on a Star Alliance flight in F is permitted access to the TG F lounge. Same thing with SQ at SIN.

The ONLY Star carrier violating this Star Alliance rule is LH. PERIOD.

If LH wants to play its own game with lounge access, it should leave Star and joing One World where that kind of crap goes on. Until then, LH should follow the rules it agreed to when joining the Star Alliance.
I actually agree with you that it is against the spirit of an alliance to restrict the top product to their own customers. And it is strange that a person departing on LH F from BKK can use the (very nice) F lounge and a person departing on TG F from FRA can only use the (not very nice) SEN lounges.

BTW, things on the oneworld side are actually better, not worse than Star Alliance. You always have access to the best available lounges as a oneworld Emerald. The only exception I know of is the Concord Room at LHR T4/T5.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.