United MileagePlus vs. Lufthansa Miles&More [merged]
#94
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
Programs: LH HON, BA Gold, EK Gold
Posts: 14,505
Hello, I am long time UA 1K (also for 2008) w/dual residence of SFO & BLR, India. I will be flying mostly LH 8-10 times a year between SFO-BLR on Z or D fares w/sporadic intra US travel on A, F or YUP fares. I prefer LH business over UA business and question is:
Should I stick to UA MP where I could easily do 150K+ EQM's and hence 8+ SWU's which I could use it to upgrade from LH business on a standby basis? or move to LH M&M? I seldom fly full fare business and mostly on Z fares.
If LH it is, is there a difference between US and India domicile in terms of perks?
Thanks!
Should I stick to UA MP where I could easily do 150K+ EQM's and hence 8+ SWU's which I could use it to upgrade from LH business on a standby basis? or move to LH M&M? I seldom fly full fare business and mostly on Z fares.
If LH it is, is there a difference between US and India domicile in terms of perks?
Thanks!
Probably better to keep your account registered in the US. I haven't heard of any India based advantages.
#95
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago
Programs: LH FT *S, UA 1P *G
Posts: 10
M&M vs United Mileage Plus
Hi all,
First post here although I have been a faithful reader and lurker for the past 2years learning something along the way. ^ As I am traveling this Christmas season something has been bothering me since I have achieved the Frequent Traveler status in M&M program.
I am a M&M *S Frequent Traveler on LH and I am situated in Chicago. I will keep this status until February 2010. I logged about <100K award miles and close to 60K status miles. Although I could be doing more traveling next year on average I do a minimum of 3-4 transatlantic flights (including 3-4 intra-Europe connecting flights) a year plus 4 US flights usually flying on LH/UA Star alliance metal usually on Y class unless there are good deals/upgrades on C. I also have a United Mileage Plus card that I really don’t use on which I logged a miserable 5K+ miles.
Now my quandary is what would be an advantage to chase the elusive Senator Gold status on M&M when I could get United Premier for only 20K extra miles (need 25K EQM to qualify) and further to actually try to obtain Premier Executive for which I only need 50K EQM’s. In addition I would enjoy, Economy plus upgrades, 500-mile E-Upgrades and the Gold/Silver status on M&M.
I would love to hear your expert opinion should I just stick with M&M program or take advantage of my Chicago location to use UA with their program fully to easier build up the ladder of their loyalty program to Gold/Premier Executive in addition to one I have?
Thanks in advance
First post here although I have been a faithful reader and lurker for the past 2years learning something along the way. ^ As I am traveling this Christmas season something has been bothering me since I have achieved the Frequent Traveler status in M&M program.
I am a M&M *S Frequent Traveler on LH and I am situated in Chicago. I will keep this status until February 2010. I logged about <100K award miles and close to 60K status miles. Although I could be doing more traveling next year on average I do a minimum of 3-4 transatlantic flights (including 3-4 intra-Europe connecting flights) a year plus 4 US flights usually flying on LH/UA Star alliance metal usually on Y class unless there are good deals/upgrades on C. I also have a United Mileage Plus card that I really don’t use on which I logged a miserable 5K+ miles.
Now my quandary is what would be an advantage to chase the elusive Senator Gold status on M&M when I could get United Premier for only 20K extra miles (need 25K EQM to qualify) and further to actually try to obtain Premier Executive for which I only need 50K EQM’s. In addition I would enjoy, Economy plus upgrades, 500-mile E-Upgrades and the Gold/Silver status on M&M.
I would love to hear your expert opinion should I just stick with M&M program or take advantage of my Chicago location to use UA with their program fully to easier build up the ladder of their loyalty program to Gold/Premier Executive in addition to one I have?
Thanks in advance
#96
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From and of Boston.
Posts: 4,973
I might consider other programs, but I would surely counsel against United. United has instituted a particularly draconian award system, in which they use Starnet to block MP users from getting award seats on other airlines (in many, but certainly not all, instances). If you search the United forum for 'Starnet,' you'll find lots and lots of people who have been unable to obtain seats on LH when those seats were very clearly available to every other *A airline. I've also experienced the same trying to use MP miles for a TG award seat.
#97
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BRU
Programs: LH SEN, SN Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche, BA, QF, AF
Posts: 6,856
Welcome to FT! (at least welcome to being active!)
Generally, if you fly Y, MP is the better choice. You would probably easily get *G with your pattern.
However, FTL status is pretty valuable when you fly on M&M airlines.
So it depends what is important for you!
SmilingBoy.
Generally, if you fly Y, MP is the better choice. You would probably easily get *G with your pattern.
However, FTL status is pretty valuable when you fly on M&M airlines.
So it depends what is important for you!
SmilingBoy.
#98
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: LGA
Posts: 396
If you fly in Y, MP has two big advantages:
-All Y fares get you 100% status mileage.
-E+
Also, *G is at 50k rather than 100k. So, if you're flying on cheap Y fares, you'll make *G with 50k actual flight miles rather than 200k.
Award availability on partner airlines is bad with MP. But (if flying cheap Y fares) you'll have twice as many miles to work with which will more than make up for it.
-All Y fares get you 100% status mileage.
-E+
Also, *G is at 50k rather than 100k. So, if you're flying on cheap Y fares, you'll make *G with 50k actual flight miles rather than 200k.
Award availability on partner airlines is bad with MP. But (if flying cheap Y fares) you'll have twice as many miles to work with which will more than make up for it.
#99
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: HAM
Programs: LH FTL *S, UA 1P *G
Posts: 140
Welcome to FT!
There should be quite a few threads around about M+ against MM. Nevertheless your pattern looks more like a UA M+ one. Benefits of the programmes:
Pro M+:
- Easier advance to *G
- E+ acess for Y flights
- 100% EQM even on cheap UA metal
- 100% RDM bonus as 1P
- Transcon upgrades for 30k miles from some discounted Eco fares
- 500 milers
Pro MM FTL:
- 2 years of status
- better benefits within LH area (Lounge acess to LH business lounges)
- Better award availability against reasonable mileage (e.g. 90k miles for a business round trip US-Europe)
As you already have the FTL go with MP for the next year and try to get 1P with UA. If this is not working out you can still switch back to MM and reobatin FTL or try to head for SEN. But in general you will be better off with a status at that airline you fly most.
One really huge advantage being *G on LH metal is that they block the seat next to you if possible - even as a UA 1P. This the FTL status does not do.
There should be quite a few threads around about M+ against MM. Nevertheless your pattern looks more like a UA M+ one. Benefits of the programmes:
Pro M+:
- Easier advance to *G
- E+ acess for Y flights
- 100% EQM even on cheap UA metal
- 100% RDM bonus as 1P
- Transcon upgrades for 30k miles from some discounted Eco fares
- 500 milers
Pro MM FTL:
- 2 years of status
- better benefits within LH area (Lounge acess to LH business lounges)
- Better award availability against reasonable mileage (e.g. 90k miles for a business round trip US-Europe)
As you already have the FTL go with MP for the next year and try to get 1P with UA. If this is not working out you can still switch back to MM and reobatin FTL or try to head for SEN. But in general you will be better off with a status at that airline you fly most.
One really huge advantage being *G on LH metal is that they block the seat next to you if possible - even as a UA 1P. This the FTL status does not do.
#100
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago
Programs: LH FT *S, UA 1P *G
Posts: 10
Great answers ....
Welcome to FT! (at least welcome to being active!)
Generally, if you fly Y, MP is the better choice. You would probably easily get *G with your pattern.
However, FTL status is pretty valuable when you fly on M&M airlines.
So it depends what is important for you!
SmilingBoy.
Generally, if you fly Y, MP is the better choice. You would probably easily get *G with your pattern.
However, FTL status is pretty valuable when you fly on M&M airlines.
So it depends what is important for you!
SmilingBoy.
I might consider other programs, but I would surely counsel against United. United has instituted a particularly draconian award system, in which they use Starnet to block MP users from getting award seats on other airlines (in many, but certainly not all, instances). If you search the United forum for 'Starnet,' you'll find lots and lots of people who have been unable to obtain seats on LH when those seats were very clearly available to every other *A airline. I've also experienced the same trying to use MP miles for a TG award seat.
If you fly in Y, MP has two big advantages:
-All Y fares get you 100% status mileage.
-E+
Also, *G is at 50k rather than 100k. So, if you're flying on cheap Y fares, you'll make *G with 50k actual flight miles rather than 200k.
Award availability on partner airlines is bad with MP. But (if flying cheap Y fares) you'll have twice as many miles to work with which will more than make up for it.
-All Y fares get you 100% status mileage.
-E+
Also, *G is at 50k rather than 100k. So, if you're flying on cheap Y fares, you'll make *G with 50k actual flight miles rather than 200k.
Award availability on partner airlines is bad with MP. But (if flying cheap Y fares) you'll have twice as many miles to work with which will more than make up for it.
Welcome to FT!
There should be quite a few threads around about M+ against MM. Nevertheless your pattern looks more like a UA M+ one. Benefits of the programmes:
Pro M+:
- Easier advance to *G
- E+ acess for Y flights
- 100% EQM even on cheap UA metal
- 100% RDM bonus as 1P
- Transcon upgrades for 30k miles from some discounted Eco fares
- 500 milers
Pro MM FTL:
- 2 years of status
- better benefits within LH area (Lounge acess to LH business lounges)
- Better award availability against reasonable mileage (e.g. 90k miles for a business round trip US-Europe)
As you already have the FTL go with MP for the next year and try to get 1P with UA. If this is not working out you can still switch back to MM and reobatin FTL or try to head for SEN. But in general you will be better off with a status at that airline you fly most.
One really huge advantage being *G on LH metal is that they block the seat next to you if possible - even as a UA 1P. This the FTL status does not do.
There should be quite a few threads around about M+ against MM. Nevertheless your pattern looks more like a UA M+ one. Benefits of the programmes:
Pro M+:
- Easier advance to *G
- E+ acess for Y flights
- 100% EQM even on cheap UA metal
- 100% RDM bonus as 1P
- Transcon upgrades for 30k miles from some discounted Eco fares
- 500 milers
Pro MM FTL:
- 2 years of status
- better benefits within LH area (Lounge acess to LH business lounges)
- Better award availability against reasonable mileage (e.g. 90k miles for a business round trip US-Europe)
As you already have the FTL go with MP for the next year and try to get 1P with UA. If this is not working out you can still switch back to MM and reobatin FTL or try to head for SEN. But in general you will be better off with a status at that airline you fly most.
One really huge advantage being *G on LH metal is that they block the seat next to you if possible - even as a UA 1P. This the FTL status does not do.
Thanks everyone who contributed to this thread, and if there is more ideas please keep them coming.
Cheers ^
#101
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: FRA, DRS
Programs: M&M SEN , Hilton Diamond, NH Platinum
Posts: 155
I might consider other programs, but I would surely counsel against United. United has instituted a particularly draconian award system, in which they use Starnet to block MP users from getting award seats on other airlines (in many, but certainly not all, instances). If you search the United forum for 'Starnet,' you'll find lots and lots of people who have been unable to obtain seats on LH when those seats were very clearly available to every other *A airline. I've also experienced the same trying to use MP miles for a TG award seat.
However, I used some UA miles on LH-metal flight (GOT-FRA-GOT) with no problem. In addition, the taxes were only around $50 with UA, whereas if I have booked it with LH miles the taxes would be around $100.
So, I guess, it depends (as usual) on the date and flight route, to reedem miles. Sometimes it fits my schedule, sometimes not.....
#102
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF Lifetime SG, LH HON, OZ Lifetime Diamond +, HH Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 14,372
The other thing to consider is lounge access. If you get *G through UA you will not have access to the RCC when flying domestically in the US. If you have *G with LH you will have access to every *G lounge including the RCC.
#103
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OSL/IAH/ZRH (time, not preference)
Programs: UA1K, LH GM, AA EXP->GM
Posts: 38,265
In not one instance was I able to use LH miles when I could not redeem MP for that route. This year alone I failed 8 attempts to get NZ awards on the dates I wanted and M&L had the same shortage on those seats.
In the TG case however I have to somewhat agree. TG withholds premium inventory to the UK from MP. The speculation range from MP being too 'low revenue' for TG through the lack of proper billing for the UK premium seats scam tax.
#104
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LAX now DUS
Programs: AA LT Plat, IHG Plat., former LH HON (now Silver), Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 774
I might consider other programs, but I would surely counsel against United. United has instituted a particularly draconian award system, in which they use Starnet to block MP users from getting award seats on other airlines (in many, but certainly not all, instances). If you search the United forum for 'Starnet,' you'll find lots and lots of people who have been unable to obtain seats on LH when those seats were very clearly available to every other *A airline. I've also experienced the same trying to use MP miles for a TG award seat.