Non functioning APU on A380 [in SIN]
#16
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,724
On an A380 from FRA to SIN, the APUs is almost completely unnecessary.
#17
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,724
You probably meant "without", then I fully agree.
PS: nobody mentioned Sully.
#18
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NT Australia
Programs: QF WP
Posts: 4,160
PS: nobody mentioned Sully.
Last edited by nancypants; Sep 3, 2019 at 3:41 am
#20
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,724
So the main issue seem to be that they shouldn't have boarded pax so early, if they knew about the delay.
The APU wouldn't have helped them on the ground. Surprises me that an airport such as SIN has weak ground a/c for planes.
The APU wouldn't have helped them on the ground. Surprises me that an airport such as SIN has weak ground a/c for planes.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,640
Captain said they would have used the APU & then there would have been no heat issue but it was ‘out of order’
#24
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,724
I kind of understand both sides: they probably should have sent people back into the terminal but feared they would miss their (late) slot. Not a great situation. Hope nobody was seriously harmed.
#25
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,168
Sometimes you can only get the final confirmation to a slot over the very congested AfPak or Erbil airspace when you are ready to push back and request the engine startup time from ATC. It usually makes sense to board the passengers and be ready to push back, especially when you are talking about 400+ pax that could potentially be all over the very nice Changi terminal(s).
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,640
Sometimes you can only get the final confirmation to a slot over the very congested AfPak or Erbil airspace when you are ready to push back and request the engine startup time from ATC. It usually makes sense to board the passengers and be ready to push back, especially when you are talking about 400+ pax that could potentially be all over the very nice Changi terminal(s).
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,640
Not sure SIN would have let them use the APU. But he needed an excuse ...
I kind of understand both sides: they probably should have sent people back into the terminal but feared they would miss their (late) slot. Not a great situation. Hope nobody was seriously harmed.
I kind of understand both sides: they probably should have sent people back into the terminal but feared they would miss their (late) slot. Not a great situation. Hope nobody was seriously harmed.
For F pax, it was madness to escort us from the lounge & board us early but for sure we had more air to breathe than the other pax... & another thing that wasn’t working was a Urinal, all taped up, must be no plumbers in Changi either
#28
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: OZ Diamond, Jiffypark Manhattan Gold
Posts: 4,485
I don't wanna speak out of turn, but APUs are left "broken" constantly. I'm not sure if it's airline by airline, or aircraft type by aircraft type. We do airstarts on 737s and ERJs all the time. But doing an airstart on a 777 happens once a year or once every handful of months. Honestly, I wish pilots wouldn't mention it, with most people's lack of knowledge about aircrafts, saying anything is wrong just causes confusion/panic.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,640
I don't think the pilot is blaming SIN for LH maintenance issues. He is however accusing them of having insufficient PCA. I work at YVR, we don't use PCA THAT much during the year and the only 380 we get is BA, who doesn't use it, so I can't speak to its ability to cool an aircraft that size.
So how do you think BA keep their A380 cool, if they are not using PCA ?
#30
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: OZ Diamond, Jiffypark Manhattan Gold
Posts: 4,485
BA is on the ground for just under 2 hours, they don't take PCA, CX same, some of the US carriers will try and get that PCA regardless of turn time. A huge pain since it takes 1 person away for like a solid 5-10 minutes between hooking up and taking down. The longer turns all take it, BR, CI, MU, PR etc.