Misconnect in MUC Question
Hello Lufthansa Friends. I am travelling tonight with my family YOW-YYZ-MUC-AGP. YYZ to MUC is showing over an hour late and we will misconnect MUC to AGP. I called Lufthansa and they protected me on the later MUC to AGP flight which is wonderful news given this is the peak of the season and we are a family of 5. Can you please confirm my understanding: 1. When I arrive in MUC I am to go to the customer service desk to obtain new boarding passes and 2. The baggage will automatically be transferred to the new flight. Thank you. |
1.Yep / u will get new BP on your email straight after landing in MUC
2. Yep no worries, enjoy your flight |
Since the later MUC-AGP arrives >3 hours after the earlier flight don't forget to claim EC261 compensation as well
|
Originally Posted by truncated
(Post 31427010)
Since the later MUC-AGP arrives >3 hours after the earlier flight don't forget to claim EC261 compensation as well
|
Originally Posted by athome
(Post 31427119)
Strongly depends on the reason. And its 4 hours, not 3.
Either way if OP doesn't write in for compensation they won't get any so no harm in doing so, no? |
It was a Nightmare
For some unknown reason. Lufthansa rebooked us instead YYZ to Manchester UK to Malaga. I don’t understand why. If you see above we were protected on the later 1430 Munich to Malaga flight (do you think my proactively calling Lufthansa to get protected on that later flight caused all this mess?) The problem is the checked in baggage. I knew there was no way the baggage would get rerouted on the new itinerary through Manchester. I also knew that Lufthansa would reject the bags if we were no longer booked on the flight to Munich. A vacation with no bags is no vacation. Long story short - we were reunited with our baggage after 3 hours at Toronto airport of persistently asking Lufthansa baggage services and Air Canada baggage services. Lufthansa agreed to rebook us to Malaga tomorrow through Munich (that was nuts as well as we had to be offloaded from the flight from Ottawa which arrived 8 hours earlier so Lufthansa could use the coupon). So we lose a night vacation but we stay with our bags. I have 3 kids. The bags are a big deal. |
Originally Posted by Salisbury5
(Post 31428129)
So we lose a night vacation but we stay with our bags. I have 3 kids. The bags are a big deal. |
IMO, the OP should have boarded the YYZ-MUC flight without complaining at Toronto and asking to be rebooked at MUC.
In the current situation, it seems that the OP has lost a day and probably paid their own hotel in YYZ + their expenses as they have volunteered to travel a day later. The airline had offered them a better re-routing ( obviously in their own perspective ). If he had gone to the MUC transfer desk being quiet at YYZ, he would have received a minimum ( 300 EUR x 5 = 1500 EUR ) in cash and would not lose a day but only hours. By the way, MAN to AGP is also served by BA CityFlyer and Iberia ( possibly IberiaExpress ) during the summer season. |
Well that was a surprise
I love FlyerTalk. I read it every day. I have read it every day for maybe 15 years. I consider myself an experienced traveller. And I greatly respect my fellow Flyertalkers for your advice and experience and helpfulness. This experience is is no exception. But it it seems that my experience and desire to be proactive (something I learned from FlyerTalk) might have been the cause of my troubles last night. Lets put EUR 261 compensation aside completely please for the following question. i would have assumed that my fellow FlyerTalkers would have also been proactive in calling Lufthansa from Canada and finding out what in advance awaits them in Munich. Certainly I was happy to hear about being “protected” on the later Malaga flight. And it put my mind at ease before an overnight transatlantic flight. Plus maybe I took the last 5 seats from the MUC-AGP flight saving me a night in Munich (ignoring EUR261 again please). But sometime after I hung up with Lufthansa I was (presumably automatically) offloaded from the YYZ-MUC flight and put on some crazy routing through Manchester. The previous poster suggests I may have caused this myself somehow. And if I kept quiet I would not have been re-routed. I respect his opinion. I was just doing what I thought you all would agree was the best way forward. Be proactive. In the case if IRROPS always call, always be proactiv, is the usual advice here. So so did I do wrong? |
Originally Posted by Salisbury5;31428728[left
I was just doing what I thought you all would agree was the best way forward. Be proactive. In the case if IRROPS always call, always be proactiv, is the usual advice here.
So so did I do wrong? I suspect there were not actually 5 seats on the later flight as the agent promised you. Since otherwise there is no way you would have been rerouted via MAN. So, in the end by being proactive did result in no EU261 compensation & funding your own care which would have otherwise been LH’s responsibility |
Originally Posted by chris63
(Post 31429098)
I agree that being proactive is usually the best policy. True, often it is... but also depends on the situation. Getting to MUC (or FRA) first and the figure out how to proceed is not a bad thing as you got quite a lot of options from MUC/FRA and a mit of LH staff on the ground. Calling in or talking to (in the worst case outsourced) outstation agents sometimes leads to not that desirable outcomes. My first priority is always to get over the pond, then figure out the shorthaul later. |
Originally Posted by fassy
(Post 31430170)
True, often it is... but also depends on the situation. Getting to MUC (or FRA) first and the figure out how to proceed is not a bad thing as you got quite a lot of options from MUC/FRA and a mit of LH staff on the ground. Calling in or talking to (in the worst case outsourced) outstation agents sometimes leads to not that desirable outcomes. My first priority is always to get over the pond, then figure out the shorthaul later. |
Originally Posted by fassy
(Post 31430170)
Calling in or talking to (in the worst case outsourced) outstation agents sometimes leads to not that desirable outcomes.
Speaking to the airport agents (outsourced or not) get this resolved immediately without the constraints imposed by call center agents. |
Originally Posted by Salisbury5
(Post 31428129)
The problem is the checked in baggage. I knew there was no way the baggage would get rerouted on the new itinerary through Manchester. I also knew that Lufthansa would reject the bags if we were no longer booked on the flight to Munich. A vacation with no bags is no vacation. |
In my opinion this "protect me on a later flight proactively" is a North American thing which I rarely hear form European airlines but I might be wrong. My guess is that the agent did not protect you on a later flight but tried to rebook you and screwed up. What I did not understand when the OP became aware of the unusual rerouting via MAN? At the airport at YOW during check-in, during transfer at YYZ or even earlier? Who did the rebooking? An agent at the airport at YOW or YYZ or was at someone at the LH backoffice? If it was done at the backoffice when was the OP notified? I also do not understand the luggage situation. Why does the OP think the luggage would be routed via MUC instead of taking the same route as the OP. Sorry for all the questions but with the limited information at hand we can only widely speculate.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.