Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why does Lufthansa hub in FRA/MUC, and not Berlin and/or Hamburg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2018, 12:03 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 632
Originally Posted by RolfD
and which government is the pay master of Europe? . and all those offices that you mention are control but the Federal government of Germany and Bayern's parliament is of the 16 state parliaments of Germany which are represented in Berlin (again Berlin) by the Bundesrat ( need to know what is the Bundesrat?).
still: German GDP generation happens elsewhere (it‘s the only country I am aware of where GDP per capita is diluted by its capital).
sw1x is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2018, 1:08 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Berlin, TXL
Programs: OW Emerald, *A gold, Skyteam elite plus, Hilton gold, SPG gold
Posts: 339
[QUOTE=chris63;29629084]
Originally Posted by 8420PR
Lufthansa did have an aggressive expansion plan for Berlin in 2011 and 2012, with a short haul hub (30 new destinations) in operation along with long haul plans for 2013/2014. It was planned to start in June 2012 with the opening of the new airport/QUOTE]

Thanks for the info.

I rather thought it was in part down to BER not opening, who knows what impact that would have made & incredibly no one seems to know when BER will open even now.....
I live In Berlin and we joke about the opening day. you can guest any opening day and it will delay again by a minimum of 2 years or more
RolfD is offline  
Old Apr 11, 2018, 2:27 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: WAW
Programs: A3(*G), Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 2,534
Seems that some people are wondering why only FRA and MUC exist as hubs, and not TXL or DUS also.

Maybe it's time to count one's blessings. After all, which other EU countries have more than one bona fide hub to choose from for their mainline carrier? Would anyone really count LYS for AF, LGW for BA or BCN for IB? (sound of crickets chirping...)
hugolover and RolfD like this.
yurtripper is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2018, 10:59 pm
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by frogster
DUS is too close to FRA for any hub to develop there – but why did nothing develop in the north?
Düsseldorf could never become a hub because the airport has severe traffic restrictions due to agreements entered into with the surrounding cities and villages (Angerland Vertrag) and it is by far too close to the city. Munich is in the middle of nowhere with plenty of open space. Hamburg once again is in the middle of populated areas.
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2018, 11:10 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by 1flyer

I think Frankfurt has an locational advantage not just over Berlin but also over Dusseldorf. I think if you wanted to look at it from a developmental perspective, the interesting question is who benefits most from the increasing economic importance of Eastern Europe (certainly not Dusseldorf, but probably also not Frankfurt).
The main thing is that you can't build an airport wherever you want to built an airport. Munich was planned ad the second LH Hub because it is located on a greenfield. The old Munich airport was close to the middle of town, like Hamburg, Berlin-Tegel and Düsseldorf. For Berlin they planned a comparable Greenfield location, however as the third big airport in Germany. Why should LH move from FRA (which is conveniently located and THE airline industry powerhouese) and MUC (which is an airport which allows for growth due to the location in the middle of nowhere) move to BER? For AirBerlin it was different: The had planned for BER as an hub as there was no competition from LH. enough slots and ressources in BER to develop a OW Hub. The same was true to a certain extent for DUS. They had DUS as a traditional hub with a certain number of long distance flights and took a certain advantage of LH's arrogant move to neglect the area with a high local demand. However, Airport restrictions made this more than difficult
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2018, 11:13 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by sw1x


still: German GDP generation happens elsewhere (it‘s the only country I am aware of where GDP per capita is diluted by its capital).
Than you are not aware of countries like Canada, Australia, Italy and the US. Berlin is poor, sexy and not that unique. But all of these have one in common with Berlin: Neither Ottawa nor Canberra nor Rome nor Washington have anything like the biggest airports in the country,
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 12, 2018, 11:20 pm
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by RolfD
and which government is the pay master of Europe? . and all those offices that you mention are control but the Federal government of Germany and Bayern's parliament is of the 16 state parliaments of Germany which are represented in Berlin (again Berlin) by the Bundesrat ( need to know what is the Bundesrat?).
For government traffic, Tegel and even Tempelhof would be sufficient. Being the "pay master" of Europe does not qualify for being a centre of the airline industry. And the Berliners should never forget that the rest of Germany paid for Berlin like Berlin were a developing country before 1989 and even more after 1989. Berlin is nice, poor and sexy and the latter two words point out that your city government (having created this saying) is at least as arrogant as your post. The "pay master" of Europe might sit in Berlin (federal government) so sits the "beggar" of Germany (state government).
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2018, 5:53 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NAP
Programs: LH, BA, TK
Posts: 2,409
Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer
But all of these have one in common with Berlin: Neither Ottawa nor Canberra nor Rome nor Washington have anything like the biggest airports in the country,
Rome it is.
Forrest Bump is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2018, 6:43 am
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by Forrest Bump
Rome it is.
Would not have thought so but you are right, indeed. I personally understand northern Italy to be the by far more active part of the country. The passenger numbers are probably a result of the high density of airports in the northern region of Italy (MXP, LIN, BGY, VRN, TSF, VCE, TRN) compared to only two airports (FCO and CIA) in the heart of Italy.
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2018, 12:25 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: HAG
Programs: Der 5* FTL
Posts: 8,038
Originally Posted by Flying Lawyer
Would not have thought so but you are right, indeed. I personally understand northern Italy to be the by far more active part of the country. The passenger numbers are probably a result of the high density of airports in the northern region of Italy (MXP, LIN, BGY, VRN, TSF, VCE, TRN) compared to only two airports (FCO and CIA) in the heart of Italy.
Rome is not a good example. While the South is indeed much less economically active than the North of Italy, Rome itself is still well over country average of GDP pp. Only Milan is above.
It is also true that Northern Italy has a lot more airports than the Southern part of the country. Milan metro has three, plus there's Turin, Genoa, Verona and Bologna relatively nearby. Beisdes Rome, only Naples is a big destination relatively close by that I can think of.
AlicorporateUK and N1003U like this.
Fabo.sk is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2018, 12:28 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SJJ/AMS
Posts: 4,647
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
Rome is not a good example. While the South is indeed much less economically active than the North of Italy, Rome itself is still well over country average of GDP pp. Only Milan is above.
It is also true that Northern Italy has a lot more airports than the Southern part of the country. Milan metro has three, plus there's Turin, Genoa, Verona and Bologna relatively nearby. Beisdes Rome, only Naples is a big destination relatively close by that I can think of.
+1.

G
AlicorporateUK is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2018, 1:49 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 60
FRA is a World City on par with Sydney, Chicago or Seoul, the others are not close.
MAYNARDS99 is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2018, 9:02 am
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by MAYNARDS99
FRA is a World City on par with Sydney, Chicago or Seoul, the others are not close.
ROFL

Frankfurt is a nice market town with 730k inhabitants and certainly number 5 populationwise in Germany. The Frankfurt metro region (even including Mainz, Offenbach and Wiesbaden) does not make Frankfurt anything like Berlin, Rhein-Ruhr or Hamburg. There ain't any German cities comparable with Chicago or Seoul
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2018, 9:05 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom
Programs: British Airways Gold
Posts: 2,636
This is such an airliners.net thread....
ajeleonard is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2018, 9:17 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by ajeleonard
This is such an airliners.net thread....
Probably. The question of the OP showed that quite a few people don't know how Germany works. When comparing other places, in particular the US, with Germany don't believe that distances in Germany are like SFO to BOS or Alaska to Key West. We are a small country. And airports are not built close to any centre because there is a centre but they were built where it is permissible, where it works with the environment and the communities around an airport. We are 80 million people in a sizewise small country full of national parks, cities, mountains and rivers. No deserts, huge plains or empty space around. And you should never forget that we don't depend on airtravel domestically. To get from Germeny's biggest city to our second biggest city (with a bit of thinking you will find out what I am talking about) you will not even find direct flights. And flying from Stuttgart to Frankfurt eg. might well take in total double as long as taking a train. And using public transport from JFK to EWR takes as long as taking public transport from DUS to FRA. Understand the difference?
LondonElite and N1003U like this.
Flying Lawyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.