Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Am I entitled to compensation? [merged]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2015, 7:21 pm
  #136  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I don't think that the delay/cancellation provisions of EC 261/2004 are as clearcut as you believe on these facts.

Presuming that the hydraulics delay was not particularly long, at least not long enough to trigger compensation, and further presuming that had the flight departed, that it would have arrived at SIN delayed by roughly the same amount of time as the departure delay, the overnight cancellation was the result of a government rule. In fact LH applied for an exception and was expressly denied.

LH will likely take the position that the delay which would give rise to compensation was occasioned by law and that is expressly outside LH's control.

I don't think it's clearcut, so she ought to seek compensation and press LH. But, LH may well not roll over quite so easily especially when it sought permission.
Often1 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2015, 8:06 pm
  #137  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by Often1
I don't think that the delay/cancellation provisions of EC 261/2004 are as clearcut as you believe on these facts.

Presuming that the hydraulics delay was not particularly long, at least not long enough to trigger compensation, and further presuming that had the flight departed, that it would have arrived at SIN delayed by roughly the same amount of time as the departure delay, the overnight cancellation was the result of a government rule. In fact LH applied for an exception and was expressly denied.

LH will likely take the position that the delay which would give rise to compensation was occasioned by law and that is expressly outside LH's control.

I don't think it's clearcut, so she ought to seek compensation and press LH. But, LH may well not roll over quite so easily especially when it sought permission.
I disagree. It seems to me pretty clearcut. Let us not forget that for an event to be an extraordinary circumstance, it must not only be outside the control of the airline but also "extraordinary", that is to say something unpredictable that is not inherent in the normal course of business.

There is nothing extraordinary whatsoever in an airport closing at its normal closure time. It is as predictable as clockwork. So, for there to be an extraordinary circumstance here, the event that prevented the airline to depart before the airport closure time must itself have been an extraordinary circumstance. The event here was an ordinary technical incident, and we know that these are not extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Reg 261/2004 and, therefore, compensation is due.
NickB is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2015, 1:22 am
  #138  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Very very clear cut! Reason for the delay is a MX - end of story!


ANY MX or other delay will trigger EU261 if you arrive at your FINAL destination >3 hours late!
Don't always get hung up on the extraordinary circumstances - these are very very very hard to proof in court and trying to do so fails in 99,9%!
They are just used as an excuse all the time by the airlines....

Last edited by Germanfflyer; Nov 5, 2015 at 3:00 am
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2015, 1:36 am
  #139  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SIN (LEJ once a year)
Programs: SQ, LH, BA, IHG Diamond AMB, HH Gold, SLH Indulged, Accor Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,738
Thanks guys for the feedback. Confirms my thoughts. Will definitely pursue it.
demue is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2015, 5:38 am
  #140  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,364
Originally Posted by Germanfflyer
ANY MX or other delay will trigger EU261 if you arrive at your FINAL destination >3 hours late!
Well, not quite ANY MX.* Those that qualify as "extraordinary" (eg: grounding and recall by Airbus or Boeing of all planes of a certain type following discovery of an hitherto unexpected fault with the plane) will not trigger compensation. But these are highly exceptional.

*: and still less any delay
NickB is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2015, 11:11 am
  #141  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by NickB
Well, not quite ANY MX.* Those that qualify as "extraordinary" (eg: grounding and recall by Airbus or Boeing of all planes of a certain type following discovery of an hitherto unexpected fault with the plane) will not trigger compensation. But these are highly exceptional.

*: and still less any delay
Not even that according to the newest developments....if this ever occurs we will see!
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2015, 11:25 am
  #142  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: Everything is refundable
Posts: 3,727
Originally Posted by Often1
I don't think that the delay/cancellation provisions of EC 261/2004 are as clearcut as you believe on these facts.

Presuming that the hydraulics delay was not particularly long, at least not long enough to trigger compensation, and further presuming that had the flight departed, that it would have arrived at SIN delayed by roughly the same amount of time as the departure delay, the overnight cancellation was the result of a government rule. In fact LH applied for an exception and was expressly denied.

LH will likely take the position that the delay which would give rise to compensation was occasioned by law and that is expressly outside LH's control.

I don't think it's clearcut, so she ought to seek compensation and press LH. But, LH may well not roll over quite so easily especially when it sought permission.
Good summary.

They will not pay any money without a lawyer or the pax taking them to court based on comparable FM incidents.
FD1971 is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2015, 3:09 am
  #143  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
It is a bad and wrong summary but as always they will very likely argue and not pay unless you get a lawyer....
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2015, 12:39 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 48
The Independent Flight Attendant’s Organization (UFO) has announced strike action for all Lufthansa flights from/ to Frankfurt and Dusseldorf on Friday, 6.11.2015 between 14.00 and 23.00 and Saturday, 7.11.2015 between 6.00 and 23.00 for all flights from/to Dusseldorf and for all flights operated with A319, A320, A321 and B737 from/to Frankfurt.

My flight from FRA to VNO for November, 07 was cancelled. My option is to rebook for the same flight on November, 08.
Am I entitled to compensation if I will rebook my flight?
george_p12 is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2015, 2:01 pm
  #145  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Programs: AY+, SK EB
Posts: 2,958
I don't know where you are located but at least the BGH (Federal Supreme Court) ruled that a strike qualifies as "extraordinary". So no compensation.
Jainzar is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2015, 2:08 pm
  #146  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: a proud member of FT since 05-05-1998
Programs: DL, AF and KL - UA - *G
Posts: 2,239
Originally Posted by george_p12
The Independent Flight Attendant’s Organization (UFO) has announced strike action for all Lufthansa flights from/ to Frankfurt and Dusseldorf on Friday, 6.11.2015 between 14.00 and 23.00 and Saturday, 7.11.2015 between 6.00 and 23.00 for all flights from/to Dusseldorf and for all flights operated with A319, A320, A321 and B737 from/to Frankfurt.

My flight from FRA to VNO for November, 07 was cancelled. My option is to rebook for the same flight on November, 08.
Am I entitled to compensation if I will rebook my flight?
No!
Germanfflyer is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2015, 1:45 am
  #147  
htb
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: UA*G(1K), PC Diamond Amb, Marriott Titanium, Accor Platinum
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by FD1971
Good summary.

They will not pay any money without a lawyer or the pax taking them to court based on comparable FM incidents.
You mean that LH should pay compensation but won't until being taken to court? Quite a reputable business operation...

HTB.
htb is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2015, 7:54 am
  #148  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Cyprus
Programs: LH SEN, A3*G, TK*G E+, ALL/Accor Plat
Posts: 644
Originally Posted by htb
You mean that LH should pay compensation but won't until being taken to court? Quite a reputable business operation...

HTB.
The best option is to commission one of the non-win no-pay flight compensation agencies based in the UK to take over the claim. In the UK, in company strikes are not considered as extraordinary circumstances since they could have been prevented by better management. I was rebooked by LH yesterday on a flight to TXL via MUC instead of FRA and have been informed that there is a 'high' chance of receiving €400 (the flight arrived 3 hours after originally scheduled). Do not use a claim service based in Germany or the claim will fail!
johnirvine is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2015, 10:50 am
  #149  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: Everything is refundable
Posts: 3,727
Originally Posted by htb
You mean that LH should pay compensation but won't until being taken to court? Quite a reputable business operation...

HTB.
No,

we have a terrible piece of legaslation, which is probably the reason why we have all kinds of decisions from various judges in multiple countries.

Based on the highly confusing legal situation, I do not blame anyone, not even Urifly or Tuifly, for all the nonsense posted since 2004 about 261.

I fully understand the approach of Lufthansa, which I discussed with at least a dozen people within LH and LH Law over the last years, so the situation is very very clear.

1. Before you travel, buy insurance

2. In case you feel you are entitled to compensation, hire a lawyer

3. In case you are a pro (only amateurs play the 261 card) think about other laws regulating compensation in the aviation industry.

4. Wait for a judge to send you or your lawyer the final decision

5. Contact the airline, a real pro prefers miles vs. cash
FD1971 is offline  
Old Nov 8, 2015, 11:27 am
  #150  
htb
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: UA*G(1K), PC Diamond Amb, Marriott Titanium, Accor Platinum
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by FD1971
I fully understand the approach of Lufthansa, which I discussed with at least a dozen people within LH and LH Law over the last years, so the situation is very very clear.
...
I don't think you're making sense. If you discussed the situation only with people within LH, the only thing that's clear is what LH would like the passengers to do... Especially the thing with "buy travel insurance" pretty much reveals it all.

HTB.
htb is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.