Advice for 5 nights in LA (previously: SFO or LAX in Nov/Dec?)
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Unio Europaea
Programs: BA GGL, AS, Hertz Cirque Présidentielle
Posts: 1,445
Advice for 5 nights in LA (previously: SFO or LAX in Nov/Dec?)
Just a quick question about SFO vs. LAX as a vacation destination: which one would you recommend in Nov/Dec? Would of course rent a car and stay probably a week. Travelling solo and not interested in sunbathing etc. Not looking for Venice Beach or alikes. More into walking, driving by car and doing public transportation to museums, nice sites and seeing also some less usual things. Heck, even going to Goodwill is fun for me.
I'm most likely doing 'Frisco, but never been to either - yet, so happy for any quick thoughts from ya'll.
I'm most likely doing 'Frisco, but never been to either - yet, so happy for any quick thoughts from ya'll.
#2
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,580
If you really want to rent a car, then SF is probably not practical due to difficulty of driving on hills and expensive parking. Both cities are large and have plenty of museums and random things to see. SF is more walkable although LA has some walkable areas as well.
#3
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,854
If you do decide to do SF, please don't call it "Frisco!" Agree that a rental car is usually a negative inside the city of San Francisco. It's helpful, maybe essential, if you're going elsewhere in the bay area.
#4
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: United, AA, KrisFlyer
Posts: 179
Bay Area Native Here
Just a quick question about SFO vs. LAX as a vacation destination: which one would you recommend in Nov/Dec? Would of course rent a car and stay probably a week. Travelling solo and not interested in sunbathing etc. Not looking for Venice Beach or alikes. More into walking, driving by car and doing public transportation to museums, nice sites and seeing also some less usual things. Heck, even going to Goodwill is fun for me.
I'm most likely doing 'Frisco, but never been to either - yet, so happy for any quick thoughts from ya'll.
I'm most likely doing 'Frisco, but never been to either - yet, so happy for any quick thoughts from ya'll.
Transit is easier in SF, but just be aware that its not exactly a comfortable way to ride. Buses and trains are pretty poorly maintained and are very dirty. If youre traveling in or near the core area, its likely youll have a homeless person or mentally unstable person on the bus part of the way. Schedules, depending on the particular line, are more honored in the breach. But I would still guess that at least availability is better than LA.
weather wise at that time of the year, LA wins hands down. Based solely on the weather, Id pick LA in winter and summer. Spring and fall, Id pick SF.
#5
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Unio Europaea
Programs: BA GGL, AS, Hertz Cirque Présidentielle
Posts: 1,445
Okay, many thanks for all your input! Will do - no more 'Frisco. The fare I was looking for was pulled, so not going to CA this time. However will keep in mind the advice, once a suitable fare pops up again.
#6
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
I would note that the weather has gotten more fickle nowadays - this used to be rainy season, but you can more likely count on SoCal to have consistently nicer weather (assuming there are no forest fires raging). SF is the more compact city, but depending on where you park yourself in LA, you can make use non-road base mass transit (e.g. the light rail between Santa Monica and downtown LA) to get around. It's really a matter of preference.
As for the folks recommending not renting a car - I almost always do when I come visit the Bay Area, including when I stay in the heart of downtown SF. It's expensive, but I much prefer the convenience for getting around, even within the city.
As for the folks recommending not renting a car - I almost always do when I come visit the Bay Area, including when I stay in the heart of downtown SF. It's expensive, but I much prefer the convenience for getting around, even within the city.
#7
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Southern California
Programs: AA EXPlat, 2.4MM; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 580
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco
Programs: GM on VX, UA, AA, HA, AS, SY; Budget Fastbreak
Posts: 27,597
If you want to visit Sf, you can lyft/rideshare to get around and avoid parking expenses. It’s really a great walking city - just 7x7 square miles! Granted I drive all over Sf but at night I’ll lyft a lot.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Unio Europaea
Programs: BA GGL, AS, Hertz Cirque Présidentielle
Posts: 1,445
Well, it's typical for my travels that things change as I discover new airfares. So it's going to be CA after all. 5 nights in LA, arriving on Black Friday.
I'm looking to rent a car (most likely from Sixt, based on the current rates for Hertz) as I'll probably cruise around a bit. Most likely wouldn't plan renting, if it would've been SFO. Based on your responses, it's not all too convenient to have a car there.
Any recommendations for where to stay with a rental car as your bless and burden? I.e. which area/s would you recommend? You're also free to suggest why I should skip a rental in LA.
Mainly thinking about traffic and how long driving takes. I have Best Western Platinum status, so I did look up their options, but there's so many options to choose from and it's not easy to evaluate the hotel locations as a first timer in LA. Accor Hotels doesn't have any plausible options for me, but I'm open to grab something with Booking.com. I also have Gold with Radisson, but there's much less options than with all BW brands combined.
I'm looking to rent a car (most likely from Sixt, based on the current rates for Hertz) as I'll probably cruise around a bit. Most likely wouldn't plan renting, if it would've been SFO. Based on your responses, it's not all too convenient to have a car there.
Any recommendations for where to stay with a rental car as your bless and burden? I.e. which area/s would you recommend? You're also free to suggest why I should skip a rental in LA.
Mainly thinking about traffic and how long driving takes. I have Best Western Platinum status, so I did look up their options, but there's so many options to choose from and it's not easy to evaluate the hotel locations as a first timer in LA. Accor Hotels doesn't have any plausible options for me, but I'm open to grab something with Booking.com. I also have Gold with Radisson, but there's much less options than with all BW brands combined.
#10
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
Moderator's Action
The thread has been renamed and moved at the OP's request.
TWA884
California moderator
TWA884
California moderator
#11
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
While it may be an old thread, a lot of the information posted there is still valid:
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,597
The time between any two points in LA is either 20 minutes or 2 hours, entirely depending on the time of day.
Pick a couple areas that you want to visit and get a hotel near one or more of them. What previous posters have said about walking in LA is true - there are many walkable areas, but you have to drive or use transit to get from one to another. There are tons of museums (allegedly 800+, according to the propaganda brochure at a conference I attended here), there's hiking in the mountains, there's a lot of good theater (big and small), and just about anything you could possibly be interested in except for subzero weather.
Pick a couple areas that you want to visit and get a hotel near one or more of them. What previous posters have said about walking in LA is true - there are many walkable areas, but you have to drive or use transit to get from one to another. There are tons of museums (allegedly 800+, according to the propaganda brochure at a conference I attended here), there's hiking in the mountains, there's a lot of good theater (big and small), and just about anything you could possibly be interested in except for subzero weather.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,300
Mainly thinking about traffic and how long driving takes. I have Best Western Platinum status, so I did look up their options, but there's so many options to choose from and it's not easy to evaluate the hotel locations as a first timer in LA. Accor Hotels doesn't have any plausible options for me, but I'm open to grab something with Booking.com. I also have Gold with Radisson, but there's much less options than with all BW brands combined.
Failing that, I used Best Western Plus at 5005 Century Boulevard on a recent trip. Yes it's near the airport but rates are reasonable and the rooms are clean and the breakfast is really good.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 38,630
On a clear / clear-ish day, drive up to Santa Barbara for a day trip. It is under 2 hours w/o traffic, a great walking downtown and beach area (without being the sort of beach you're trying to avoid), and one of the more picturesque cities in the USA.
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Unio Europaea
Programs: BA GGL, AS, Hertz Cirque Présidentielle
Posts: 1,445
Duly noted and will keep that as an option. Thanks!
Last edited by TWA884; Jan 31, 2019 at 11:35 am Reason: Merge consecutive posts by the same member; Please use the multi-quote function. Thank you.