KE To Be Grounded?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey City, NJ USA
Programs: AAdvantage LG, MP, BAEC, UR
Posts: 79
KE To Be Grounded?
I just read this article on ABC news that claims that Korean Air may get slapped with a 21 day suspension of service as a government penalty due to some KE employees lying to investigators about the whole "nut" incident.
I'm due to travel in First with KE on 12/26 and returning on 1/9. Wondering if I'm in any danger of losing my flights and if that is the case, what my options will be in terms of being booked in First on another carrier such as OZ, CX, JL, TG or SQ.
This whole nut thing has taken on an ugly life of it's own. Ugh.
Thoughts anyone?
I'm due to travel in First with KE on 12/26 and returning on 1/9. Wondering if I'm in any danger of losing my flights and if that is the case, what my options will be in terms of being booked in First on another carrier such as OZ, CX, JL, TG or SQ.
This whole nut thing has taken on an ugly life of it's own. Ugh.
Thoughts anyone?
#2
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,353
So in response to a hysterical tantrum and overreaction that impacted customers, the plan is to have another, government-initiated, hysterical tantrum and overreaction that will impact customers even more? Wow.
This would only be a punishment to the airline if it came with actual protections for the passengers -- guaranteed rebooking onto *any* airline that has a flight close in time to the original, at the passenger's sole choice to vary, in any class that might be available, including any fees/charges to get seats together for families etc.
Just letting them fall back on the standard "oh, we'll rebook you if and when we can. Your ticket doesn't guarantee you'll actually travel anytime near when you want" is just punishing the passengers. Make them fire the crazy lady (for real, not just from that position) and move on...
This would only be a punishment to the airline if it came with actual protections for the passengers -- guaranteed rebooking onto *any* airline that has a flight close in time to the original, at the passenger's sole choice to vary, in any class that might be available, including any fees/charges to get seats together for families etc.
Just letting them fall back on the standard "oh, we'll rebook you if and when we can. Your ticket doesn't guarantee you'll actually travel anytime near when you want" is just punishing the passengers. Make them fire the crazy lady (for real, not just from that position) and move on...
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jersey City, NJ USA
Programs: AAdvantage LG, MP, BAEC, UR
Posts: 79
So in response to a hysterical tantrum and overreaction that impacted customers, the plan is to have another, government-initiated, hysterical tantrum and overreaction that will impact customers even more? Wow.
This would only be a punishment to the airline if it came with actual protections for the passengers -- guaranteed rebooking onto *any* airline that has a flight close in time to the original, at the passenger's sole choice to vary, in any class that might be available, including any fees/charges to get seats together for families etc.
Just letting them fall back on the standard "oh, we'll rebook you if and when we can. Your ticket doesn't guarantee you'll actually travel anytime near when you want" is just punishing the passengers. Make them fire the crazy lady (for real, not just from that position) and move on...
This would only be a punishment to the airline if it came with actual protections for the passengers -- guaranteed rebooking onto *any* airline that has a flight close in time to the original, at the passenger's sole choice to vary, in any class that might be available, including any fees/charges to get seats together for families etc.
Just letting them fall back on the standard "oh, we'll rebook you if and when we can. Your ticket doesn't guarantee you'll actually travel anytime near when you want" is just punishing the passengers. Make them fire the crazy lady (for real, not just from that position) and move on...
#4
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 153
I'm slated to fly F end of January too, and that's after wrestling with the monstrosity that is korean air website and call centers, so I really don't want to have to rebook if I could help it.
Thing is, I only redeemed ICN-JFK, and bought JFK-BOS on AA on my own. So even if they rebooked me to a comparable airline, if the timing doesn't work, I might have to buy another ticket JFK-BOS
Thing is, I only redeemed ICN-JFK, and bought JFK-BOS on AA on my own. So even if they rebooked me to a comparable airline, if the timing doesn't work, I might have to buy another ticket JFK-BOS
#5
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Seoul (ex-SYD, LAX, SIN)
Programs: QF Bronze, OZ Diamond, KE
Posts: 187
Have a look at the other thread discussing it guys. The authorities here are still investigating, so nobody knows at this stage. The reports are based on what penalties are available under Korean law (assuming it's been broken, which seems to have happened) and historical precedent (check the Asiana board for a pending 45-day ban on ICN-SFO currently under appeal following their crash).
If a ban is imposed, normally the airline can choose when they take it (this is the option the gov't have given OZ), so it's not effective immediately.
As for whether such a ban is appropriate or not, in two minds about it. It definitely sends a strong message to the airlines! But agree, can imagine the uncertainty and frustration it would cause passengers!
But that's the law in these parts, so it is what it is...
If a ban is imposed, normally the airline can choose when they take it (this is the option the gov't have given OZ), so it's not effective immediately.
As for whether such a ban is appropriate or not, in two minds about it. It definitely sends a strong message to the airlines! But agree, can imagine the uncertainty and frustration it would cause passengers!
But that's the law in these parts, so it is what it is...
#7
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IND
Posts: 2,005
KE might be grounded for JFK-ICN but only for 1 month, top. And KE will do it on low-season, so definitely not on January. OZ is preparing its SFO suspension on March-April timeframe before peak season begins.
What you guys need to worry is that due to this incident, people will avoid KE for a while until they forget, I would say up to 3-6 month timeframe. Then KE may have to reduce flights due to lower booking.
What you guys need to worry is that due to this incident, people will avoid KE for a while until they forget, I would say up to 3-6 month timeframe. Then KE may have to reduce flights due to lower booking.
#8
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Asia
Programs: KF Gold | IHG Amb | SPG LTG | HH Gold
Posts: 548
I don't really understand this suspend operations and bring customer down with you theory.
What the authorities can consider should be a stiff penalty equating to shutting down 1 month service of a particular route. In that way, KE suffers huge financial impact w/o short changing customers and screwing up their routing.
What the authorities can consider should be a stiff penalty equating to shutting down 1 month service of a particular route. In that way, KE suffers huge financial impact w/o short changing customers and screwing up their routing.
#9
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IND
Posts: 2,005
I don't really understand this suspend operations and bring customer down with you theory.
What the authorities can consider should be a stiff penalty equating to shutting down 1 month service of a particular route. In that way, KE suffers huge financial impact w/o short changing customers and screwing up their routing.
What the authorities can consider should be a stiff penalty equating to shutting down 1 month service of a particular route. In that way, KE suffers huge financial impact w/o short changing customers and screwing up their routing.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Asia
Programs: KF Gold | IHG Amb | SPG LTG | HH Gold
Posts: 548
I know. However is this the best practice? As a traveller, I wouldn't want any sort of delay - that keeps me away from Korean Airlines altogether as a result.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm Member, OZ Club
Posts: 2,352
I just think the best part is that there is evidence tampering, talks of arrest and raids at KE offices and Heather Cho's home. And that all my gay Korean friends are like "woah, Stewart the purser is gay." Oh boys, duh. And this was a (gay) ballet dancer that was shocked. Love you, Korea.
#12
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IND
Posts: 2,005
I just think the best part is that there is evidence tampering, talks of arrest and raids at KE offices and Heather Cho's home. And that all my gay Korean friends are like "woah, Stewart the purser is gay." Oh boys, duh. And this was a (gay) ballet dancer that was shocked. Love you, Korea.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm Member, OZ Club
Posts: 2,352
Well his gayness isn't a rumor. It's more of, oh look, our gay friend is in the news.
Also, apparently Heather Cho was wearing a 10,000$ scarf and other super high end stuff for her apology. Oh Korean internets. What does Ilbe say?
Also, apparently Heather Cho was wearing a 10,000$ scarf and other super high end stuff for her apology. Oh Korean internets. What does Ilbe say?
#15
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriot Am, MU Pt
Posts: 3,092