The South Korea COVID-19 thread
#196
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,363
We landed 3pm last Thursday. We were late to our appt at T1 west after getting our WiFi puck and T-card. There’s two lines, one for appts and another for walk-ins. We didn’t have to wait to check in, pay and take test. There was a short line for walk-ins.
#198
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm Member, OZ Club
Posts: 2,145
None. The Korean government officials flat out have publicly said that they consider the PCR test on arrival a very effective measure of monitoring, so they're not going not to remove it any time soon.
#199
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm Member, OZ Club
Posts: 2,145
Now, as you said, some local health departments do whatever the F they want. Some throw you in a government facility. Some will say "ok well you got COVID recently, so actually we don't care." But that varies wildly, and you should not go into Korea expecting that they will accept your form and let you avoid staying home or going to a facility. These local health office rules aren't published, so we can't say which one you'll get.
#200
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: YVR
Programs: AC50K, *A Gold, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 208
Thanks. Super annoying. I'm very paranoid about a positive. Think I'll do Thailand now, and Tokyo in December
#201
Join Date: May 2010
Programs: AA Exp, Hyatt Diamond, IHG RA, Fairmont Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 127
I'm contemplating a trip to Korea since Japan isn't doing open tourism any time soon. I already have a pair of tickets between JFK and HND.
Assuming the HND-GMP route opens in July, I'm planning to do an overnight layover airside in HND and book a separate set of tickets for that.
The question I have is whether the 48hr testing requirement applies to the flight into Korea or the initial flight from JFK to HND. The former would be more difficult to time correctly than the latter, given the amount of time I'll be spending traveling.
Assuming the HND-GMP route opens in July, I'm planning to do an overnight layover airside in HND and book a separate set of tickets for that.
The question I have is whether the 48hr testing requirement applies to the flight into Korea or the initial flight from JFK to HND. The former would be more difficult to time correctly than the latter, given the amount of time I'll be spending traveling.
#202
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 34
So say a first flight is scheduled to depart at 23:59 on a Wednesday. The traveler can get their test as early as 00:00 Monday (bad example as no clinics will be open at that time, but my point stands) and still have those 71+ hours count as "2 days ago."
How much time passes while you were en route to Korea is irrelevant as long as you continually remain a transit passenger and do not enter any country where you make connections.
I think this system makes things equal for both the flyer who lives in LA and gets to take a direct flight to Seoul, and another who might have to go from Portland to Seattle to Narita to Seoul.
#203
Join Date: May 2010
Programs: AA Exp, Hyatt Diamond, IHG RA, Fairmont Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 127
48 hours before the SFO-NRT flight; the start of your journey. And they want you to think in terms of days (2), not hours, which allows for a more liberal interpretation of 48 hours that benefits the traveler.
So say a first flight is scheduled to depart at 23:59 on a Wednesday. The traveler can get their test as early as 00:00 Monday (bad example as no clinics will be open at that time, but my point stands) and still have those 71+ hours count as "2 days ago."
How much time passes while you were en route to Korea is irrelevant as long as you continually remain a transit passenger and do not enter any country where you make connections.
I think this system makes things equal for both the flyer who lives in LA and gets to take a direct flight to Seoul, and another who might have to go from Portland to Seattle to Narita to Seoul.
So say a first flight is scheduled to depart at 23:59 on a Wednesday. The traveler can get their test as early as 00:00 Monday (bad example as no clinics will be open at that time, but my point stands) and still have those 71+ hours count as "2 days ago."
How much time passes while you were en route to Korea is irrelevant as long as you continually remain a transit passenger and do not enter any country where you make connections.
I think this system makes things equal for both the flyer who lives in LA and gets to take a direct flight to Seoul, and another who might have to go from Portland to Seattle to Narita to Seoul.
#204
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: California
Programs: AA EXP; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Bonvoy Titanium Elite
Posts: 1,295
48 hours before the SFO-NRT flight; the start of your journey. And they want you to think in terms of days (2), not hours, which allows for a more liberal interpretation of 48 hours that benefits the traveler.
So say a first flight is scheduled to depart at 23:59 on a Wednesday. The traveler can get their test as early as 00:00 Monday (bad example as no clinics will be open at that time, but my point stands) and still have those 71+ hours count as "2 days ago."
How much time passes while you were en route to Korea is irrelevant as long as you continually remain a transit passenger and do not enter any country where you make connections.
I think this system makes things equal for both the flyer who lives in LA and gets to take a direct flight to Seoul, and another who might have to go from Portland to Seattle to Narita to Seoul.
So say a first flight is scheduled to depart at 23:59 on a Wednesday. The traveler can get their test as early as 00:00 Monday (bad example as no clinics will be open at that time, but my point stands) and still have those 71+ hours count as "2 days ago."
How much time passes while you were en route to Korea is irrelevant as long as you continually remain a transit passenger and do not enter any country where you make connections.
I think this system makes things equal for both the flyer who lives in LA and gets to take a direct flight to Seoul, and another who might have to go from Portland to Seattle to Narita to Seoul.
#206
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Tokyo
Programs: Bonvoy LT Titanium ANA Plat
Posts: 455
#207
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 357
This raises something I've been wondering about. Why haven't JL/NH been operating feeder flights out of ICN to NRT/HND? Is it because of potential IRROPS stranding non-Japanese passengers in Tokyo? So annoying trying to book connecting flights for JL/NH these days.
#208
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm Member, OZ Club
Posts: 2,145
JL and NH have never actually flown to Incheon airport, that's why. They only served GMP-HND for business travelers. Not even KIX.
#210
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75k
Posts: 1,449