KLM reveals plane seat most likely to kill you in a crash
KLM has really been on fire on Twitter this week!!
https://i2.wp.com/metro.co.uk/wp-con...C_76329960.jpg
Originally Posted by Metro.co.uk
An airline has apologised after tweeting information about where you are most likely to die on a plane if it crashes. KLM India has now removed the tweet which received a backlash online with many asking if it was appropriate. However, the airline tweeted saying: ‘We would like to sincerely apologise for a recent update. The post was based on a publically available aviation fact, and isn’t a @KLM opinion. It was never our intention to hurt anyone’s sentiments. The post has since been deleted.’ According to studies the highest survival rate is towards the rear of the plane with 69 per cent living to tell their tale. However, there is disagreement about whether the middle or front is most dangerous. |
Has a plane seat ever killed anyone?
Johan |
I thought the back of the plane being more survivable, statistically, has been general knowledge for years.
|
I’m surprised they’re saying the middle is most dangerous though? I thought the addition of structure in the wings meant they were somewhat safer? Such that rear>middle>front? |
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 31321655)
Has a plane seat ever killed anyone?
Johan |
Originally Posted by nancypants
(Post 31321670)
I’m surprised they’re saying the middle is most dangerous though? I thought the addition of structure in the wings meant they were somewhat safer? Such that rear>middle>front? |
Originally Posted by CosmicGirl
(Post 31321900)
Structually speaking the area over the wing is the strongest, yes, however you're also closest to the fuel tanks.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/t...n-an-aircraft/ also the apparent post crash analysis of FAA data says the same thing https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry...Zaom1xrQmbwByV |
Originally Posted by nancypants
(Post 31321926)
yeah respect that. Not sure it’s something that can be studied as such but apparently that 727 that they remotely crashed in the desert a couple of years ago supports my conclusion https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/t...n-an-aircraft/ also the apparent post crash analysis of FAA data says the same thing https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry...Zaom1xrQmbwByV |
Awww....I was waiting for an update to the the old joke about seats at the back being the safest... "Ever heard of a plane backing in to a mountain?"
|
Sounds like they hired a social media intern. Good lesson learned there, I am sure.
|
Data parsing??
Things that count Were the G loads survivable else internal injuries themselves are often fatal Did the plane break up after hitting the ground? Survivors often escape through breeches in the fuselage What part of the plane hit the ground first (nose, wings,tail ?) Did the fuselage turn upside down? Did you read the seat card and turn your head looking for exits earlier.? remember the flight you were on once where having arrived late at the gate the people in the back of coach rushed forward trampling all in their way, Well a survivable crash will be worse |
Yeah I don’t know that it’s particularly amenable to very simple statistical analysis anyway. SU recently the back of the plane had a 100% fatality rate. I suppose it’s good to get people talking about aviation safety though? Maybe? |
Originally Posted by erik123
(Post 31322390)
Sounds like they hired a social media intern. Good lesson learned there, I am sure.
AT least, that's where Alitalia puts them!!! |
10 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by nancypants
(Post 31322871)
Yeah I don’t know that it’s particularly amenable to very simple statistical analysis anyway. SU recently the back of the plane had a 100% fatality rate. I suppose it’s good to get people talking about aviation safety though? Maybe? Of course, it's not the bone fractures that kill you directly; but the impediment to your quick escape is what seals your fate. (Seat choice, of course, makes no difference in an unsurvivable crash) from "Injuries in Fatal Aircraft Accidents" |
Originally Posted by irishguy28
(Post 31323378)
A documentary I watched a few years ago decided that rather than worrying about...
The chance of being involved in a serious plane crash is so small that I'm not going to waste my time agonizing about it.
Originally Posted by irishguy28
(Post 31323378)
The G forces upon impact can be severe
Johan |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:17 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.