2/17: Winds cause almost all westbound transcons to technical stop
With the impressive winds today, there's a lot of technical stopping going on (at least 37 flights by my count had to stop and gas up today). Every westbound transcon from JFK technical stopped today, as did most of the IAD and BOS flights (only BOS-SEA and the morning IAD-OAK appear to have made it without stopping).
ex-JFK flights
ex-IAD flights
ex-BOS flights
Needless to say, this isn't going to do much for B6's ontime rating for February. |
Geez, the locals in PHX, DEN and SLC are going to start thinking Jetblue is setting up hubs in those cities LOL.
|
I don't believe this with B6 has lot of aircraft came to PHX due to winds over midwest. Does B6 will ever resume nonstop from BOS, IAD, JFK all the way to SAN, OAK, LGB, BUR, LAS and etc?
|
I know JetBlue got the A320's on the cheap, but you have to wonder about the wisdom of setting up a transcon-focused airline using aircraft you know cannot do transcons when there are strong headwinds. Exactly the same thing happened fairly frequently last winter as well.
FWIW the winds--and refueling stops--continue today, 2/18. |
Originally Posted by justageek
FWIW the winds--and refueling stops--continue today, 2/18.
|
Originally Posted by flyinggolfer
And today, 2/19 as well. My wife is waiting in SAN waiting for #182 to JFK. #181 is currently in ABQ refueling.
|
Originally Posted by flyinggolfer
And today, 2/19 as well. My wife is waiting in SAN waiting for #182 to JFK. #181 is currently in ABQ refueling.
|
Originally Posted by DanJ
Geez, the locals in PHX, DEN and SLC are going to start thinking Jetblue is setting up hubs in those cities LOL.
|
Originally Posted by DanJ
Geez, the locals in PHX, DEN and SLC are going to start thinking Jetblue is setting up hubs in those cities LOL.
|
Originally Posted by j3823x
Hopefully some of the delay can be made up with a reduced turnaround time and very favorable tailwinds going back.
|
Originally Posted by flyinggolfer
Seems like the B6 people were trying to make the best of a bad situation. These refueling stops must be killing them.
|
Originally Posted by flyinggolfer
I think their return flying time was something like 4:20. Not too bad. Even though they were late, she came away with a very positive impression. In her words, "Everyone was so nice. They kept us updated and passed out drinks and snacks at the gate area while we were waiting." They also comped movies to the entire flight. Seems like the B6 people were trying to make the best of a bad situation. These refueling stops must be killing them.
|
Originally Posted by flyinggolfer
I think their return flying time was something like 4:20. Not too bad. Even though they were late, she came away with a very positive impression. In her words, "Everyone was so nice. They kept us updated and passed out drinks and snacks at the gate area while we were waiting." They also comped movies to the entire flight. Seems like the B6 people were trying to make the best of a bad situation. These refueling stops must be killing them.
|
Originally Posted by Buster CT1K
I'm surprised the pax were required to disembark during refueling. I was once diverted SYD-LAX to HNL for refueling on UA and the pax stayed aboard.
|
Originally Posted by hockeyguy
I'm surprised the refueling stops aren't putting some of the crews over their legal limits. Unless the stops are going really quick, with no arrival/departure delays, B6 must be leaving a decent margin in their crew scheduling.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.