Woman thrown off Jetblue for wearing short shorts
#31
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Ok, so the title is a little misleading and I now see why she was asked if she was wearing panties. She was wearing a baggy tshirt that was just large enough to cover her very very short shorts. From the jetblue guy's perspective, it appeared as though she had no pant or shorts on whatsoever, so he wanted to at least make sure she had panties on.
Seems reasonable to me...
Seems reasonable to me...
#33
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
#34
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-us; SCH-I500 Build/FROYO) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1)
Seems to me that this should be a non-issue. However, there are health & sanitation issues to be considered. Other passengers are going to sit in that seat during later flights. Either way, the Jet Blue supervisor should have handled it with more finesse.
Seems to me that this should be a non-issue. However, there are health & sanitation issues to be considered. Other passengers are going to sit in that seat during later flights. Either way, the Jet Blue supervisor should have handled it with more finesse.
#35
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 20
hmmm... I was aware there are limitations on the size of your carry-on, the amount of liquids you're allowed to pack, but this is the first I've heard about a dress code/panty requirement in order to fly. :tongueincheek
#36
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Silver
Posts: 79
Ok, so the title is a little misleading and I now see why she was asked if she was wearing panties. She was wearing a baggy tshirt that was just large enough to cover her very very short shorts. From the jetblue guy's perspective, it appeared as though she had no pant or shorts on whatsoever, so he wanted to at least make sure she had panties on.
Seems reasonable to me...
Seems reasonable to me...
And really a walkie talkie for determining the existence of panty????
She should sue the living worth out of JB
#37
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PHX/SFO/LAX
Programs: AA-EXP (1.7MM), BA-Slvr, HH-Diamond
Posts: 7,784
To those who espouse all this nonsense about someones right to dress as they please, remember that there is no "right" to fly. Airlines can set dress standards as they please.
#39
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northern New Jersey
Programs: OnePass, AAdvantage, TrueBlue, HHonors
Posts: 2,709
Thread would have been closed a long time ago if I spotted it sooner...
#40
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston
Programs: CO Silver
Posts: 79
Let me put it this way.
If I were wearing a baggy t-shirt with short-shorts, and if an airline gate agent asked if I had on anything under the baggy t-shirt, I would have just pulled the t-shirt up and said "Hey, look, I'm wearing shorts.".
That would be the end of that.
The fact that the passenger did not just pull the t-shirt up enough to show the shorts suggests to me that she got defiant and argumentative. That might have been the trigger to throw her off the plane.
I wasn't there, but I know what a reasonable person might have done in that situation. Letting it go that far without pulling the t-shirt up a few inches and showing the shorts is not reasonable.
This is an example of the "slippery slope" fallacy. If X is allowed to happen, then Y will inevitably follow. Y is not acceptable, therefore X should not be allowed.
"If 20 year old people are permitted to drink alcohol, pretty soon they will be letting 16 year olds drink alcohol, then they will let 10 year olds and 5 year olds drink alcohol..."
Fact: Drunk 5th graders is not a necessary consequence of lowering the drinking age from 21 to 20.
If I were wearing a baggy t-shirt with short-shorts, and if an airline gate agent asked if I had on anything under the baggy t-shirt, I would have just pulled the t-shirt up and said "Hey, look, I'm wearing shorts.".
That would be the end of that.
The fact that the passenger did not just pull the t-shirt up enough to show the shorts suggests to me that she got defiant and argumentative. That might have been the trigger to throw her off the plane.
I wasn't there, but I know what a reasonable person might have done in that situation. Letting it go that far without pulling the t-shirt up a few inches and showing the shorts is not reasonable.
This is an example of the "slippery slope" fallacy. If X is allowed to happen, then Y will inevitably follow. Y is not acceptable, therefore X should not be allowed.
"If 20 year old people are permitted to drink alcohol, pretty soon they will be letting 16 year olds drink alcohol, then they will let 10 year olds and 5 year olds drink alcohol..."
Fact: Drunk 5th graders is not a necessary consequence of lowering the drinking age from 21 to 20.
She was under no obligation to lift her shirt up and show what she was wearing or wasnt that too in front of all aboard.
What if a miniskirt donner is subject to a similar humiliation?
And putting a walkie talkie to determine the existence of underwear??? Seriously???
Oh how I am eager to read this headline
"JetBlue pays an unspecified amount for settlement to the Harlem Financial Consultant; files for bankruptcy!"