Route speculation [2011]
Last year's thread was quite entertaining and informative and even got a couple of the predictions correct. Let's see what wild (or reasonable) predictions we can come up with this year and just how many turn out to be accurate.
I'll start with two that are actually noted as routes served on one of the TrueBlue pages but are not actually in the system:
|
Not an addition, but a subtraction
B6 seems to have cut daily non-stop PWM to MCO effective May 2011. It was once a day, and will become Saturday only. Personally, not so happy about this change. :td:
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 15618672)
Last year's thread was quite entertaining and informative and even got a couple of the predictions correct. Let's see what wild (or reasonable) predictions we can come up with this year and just how many turn out to be accurate.
I'll start with two that are actually noted as routes served on one of the TrueBlue pages but are not actually in the system:
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 15618672)
|
I would like to see some AA-B6 cooperation out of LAX. AA is about to start LAX-PHX, but B6 would be a better candidate on that route with a lower cost structure.
|
Originally Posted by Seat13c
(Post 15621790)
Either its in the works or a typo... However, SFO-ORD seems a little more possible than SAN-MCO (Is there really a large enough demand for SAN-MCO???). At this point, I would start questioning any route that involve a UA/CO hub b/c of the merger which always shakes out a few newly unhappy PAX.
|
being leisure markets...i can't see SAN-anwhere in fla. maybe FLL, but i don't think there's enough O&D for that route to sustain itself.
|
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 15639778)
According to O&D passengers traffic stats and there is more than 400 dailies passengers traffic through MCO/FLL/MIA-SAN. I'm pretty confident about B6 will eventually to starts new nonstop MCO/FLL-SAN sometimes in the future. It will have a great opportunity to brings more specific new routes MCO/FLL-SAN. That's will be a logical choices.
400 to each? That's barely enough to warrent trying one transcon flight per day. You would need those PAX to pay a premium to make it work which it wouldn't. Not to mention, you'd be tying up one aircraft for the entire day to do one round trip. Either way, there are bigger fish to fry. |
Originally Posted by Seat13c
(Post 15647457)
400 PAX per day to FLL, MIA, and MCO? Sorry... That's not much of a market.
400 to each? That's barely enough to warrent trying one transcon flight per day. You would need those PAX to pay a premium to make it work which it wouldn't. Not to mention, you'd be tying up one aircraft for the entire day to do one round trip. Either way, there are bigger fish to fry. |
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 15647677)
Actually, I think there is more than 2 daily R/T is good enough for now. They should have enough more demands. There is good possible lots of navy people who likely go to SAN for everyday. I knows it will have a great opportunity for B6, NK, DL will announced it to brings new nonstop FLL/MCO-SAN. There is no payload restrictons the entire A320/A319 aircraft can handle enough the range.
|
Is there any demand for cargo between SAN-FLL/MCO? Maybe you can make it work with pax + cargo.
|
I'll say FLL-ORD
I wonder if B6 will continue expansion in S.A. Seems funny to have one flight to BOG. FLL-SJO would be nice too. Heck, I predict B6 will buy NK. |
Originally Posted by AdamSouthFL
(Post 15679617)
I'll say FLL-ORD
I wonder if B6 will continue expansion in S.A. Seems funny to have one flight to BOG. FLL-SJO would be nice too. Heck, I predict B6 will buy NK. |
Why oh why?
Cleveland, Detroit, or CAK???????? So many people in those areas longing to be served by a good carrier other than WN
|
Originally Posted by rrz518
(Post 15757503)
Cleveland, Detroit, or CAK???????? So many people in those areas longing to be served by a good carrier other than WN
How about B6 will ever considered to brings more new routes LEX/SDF/TRI/TYS/CHA-FLL? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:08 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.