So At What Point... [about North Korea missile launches]
#5
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota,USA
Programs: UA, NW
Posts: 3,752
I worry about North Korean missile attacks about the same amount that I worry about major earthquakes and typhoons, which is namely, that they may happen during my stay, but the odds are that they will not, so I just go and enjoy myself.
I gained a lot of perspective after 9/11. I was scheduled to fly from Portland (where I was living at the time) to Los Angeles for a conference a couple of months after 9/11, and I was wondering whether to cancel.
Then three things happened:
1. An otherwise healthy acquaintance died of a post-surgical blood clot
2. A 23-year-old barista at my favorite coffee shop died of a cerebral aneurysm
3. If I had been walking just a bit slower one particular morning, I would have been killed or seriously injured in a freak accident
Taken together, these three incidents made me realize that it was silly to worry about any particular remote and unpredictable mishap (After all, 5,000 planes DIDN'T get hijacked on 9/11), so I went to the conference and back on half-full planes and had a great time.
While I avoid predictable danger spots (you won't find me going to an active war zone any time soon), I have resolved not to be a ninny about dangers that are both unlikely and unpredictable.
I gained a lot of perspective after 9/11. I was scheduled to fly from Portland (where I was living at the time) to Los Angeles for a conference a couple of months after 9/11, and I was wondering whether to cancel.
Then three things happened:
1. An otherwise healthy acquaintance died of a post-surgical blood clot
2. A 23-year-old barista at my favorite coffee shop died of a cerebral aneurysm
3. If I had been walking just a bit slower one particular morning, I would have been killed or seriously injured in a freak accident
Taken together, these three incidents made me realize that it was silly to worry about any particular remote and unpredictable mishap (After all, 5,000 planes DIDN'T get hijacked on 9/11), so I went to the conference and back on half-full planes and had a great time.
While I avoid predictable danger spots (you won't find me going to an active war zone any time soon), I have resolved not to be a ninny about dangers that are both unlikely and unpredictable.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: Free agent!
Posts: 1,427
Going to be in Sapporo & Hakodate with my parents and my GF in two weeks and I can't wait.
I read an article about what people are supposed to do when the missile sirens go off but frankly, it all sounded like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The only thing that could get us to cancel our trip is if a nuclear missile actually struck land prior to our departure from the US.
I read an article about what people are supposed to do when the missile sirens go off but frankly, it all sounded like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The only thing that could get us to cancel our trip is if a nuclear missile actually struck land prior to our departure from the US.
#10
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: LH SEN; BA Gold
Posts: 8,405
Let's be honest. Kim is currently trying to impress the world by showing of that he has no problem getting ICBMs up in the sky. I might be wrong in my assertion but I would wager that the DRPK will not strike first. The moment it would attack South Korea, Japan, the US or any other country within range of their missiles, DRPK (and subsequently Kim) would be totally and utterly annihilated.
With that in mind, I guess their nuclear missile program becomes essentially only an insurance policy by serving as deterrent to anyone wanting to topple the Kim family and other leading figures of the DRPK regime.
Taking that into consideration, I wouldn't worry too much for now.
With that in mind, I guess their nuclear missile program becomes essentially only an insurance policy by serving as deterrent to anyone wanting to topple the Kim family and other leading figures of the DRPK regime.
Taking that into consideration, I wouldn't worry too much for now.
#11
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Gold
Posts: 4,820
I am going in 2 weeks. Sure , I think about it now and again...but.
1. The missiles NK has fired...theres no warhead on them, they are not targeting anyone, and no one has died.
2. Look at what just happened in the UK with tube explosion. Seems more dangerous there than Japan
3. I was there one week before the 2011 tsunami/earthquake. 15,000 plus dead. That was worrisome, yet I have been back many times since.
Frankly, I worry more about cancer. It's affected more people I know than anything else in the nasty line.
1. The missiles NK has fired...theres no warhead on them, they are not targeting anyone, and no one has died.
2. Look at what just happened in the UK with tube explosion. Seems more dangerous there than Japan
3. I was there one week before the 2011 tsunami/earthquake. 15,000 plus dead. That was worrisome, yet I have been back many times since.
Frankly, I worry more about cancer. It's affected more people I know than anything else in the nasty line.
#12
I'd actually be more apprehensive about going to London or Europe than Japan. I've been in Tokyo for the last 2 launches and only the news was covering it. Normal people just went about their business. Swiss Cheese Boy just likes throwing his toys every so often. Best to ignore it and just enjoy your trips!
#14
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378
I too have other things I'm much more worried about. Having said that, these missiles are crossing paths with all these planes, albeit at different altitude. I'm taking two more roundtrips the rest of the year in the missile zone with wife and kids. It may be trouble waiting to happen. And what the heck type of devastation is happening in the ocean at wherever these missiles are landing? This is so irresponsible, so insane.
#15
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378