JAL to launch a new route to N. American West Coast in FY2019
Feb 28, 2018, 12:23 am
#1
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
JAL to launch a new route to N. American West Coast in FY2019
http://press.jal.co.jp/en/items/uplo...91aef36c40.pdf
Let the guessing game begin! SEA, PDX, PHX, SJC? So looks like MIA isn't going to happen any time soon? At least it's not "planned" for now?
Plans to launch a new route to the west coast of North America, thereby further improve connectivity between North America and Asia, in FY2019.
Let the guessing game begin! SEA, PDX, PHX, SJC? So looks like MIA isn't going to happen any time soon? At least it's not "planned" for now?
Feb 28, 2018, 12:36 am
#3
Ambassador: Japan Airlines
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: JAL Mileage Bank, JMB Diamond, oneworld Emerald, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 16,394
oneworld doesn't really have a strong presence in the bay area. That's a reason JL001/002 are the only F route in NA that is eligible for discounted upgrade. I would be surprised if it's SJC. With the new partnership with AS, SEA could be a tempting option though.
And just like MIA, once in a while we will hear rumors on PDX so I wouldn't rule that out completely either given NH has launched both SEA and SJC routes already.
Feb 28, 2018, 7:23 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,158
It is a bit sad that it is the West Coast that is getting the annoucement, rather then the East Coast. At least in my view.
My guess would go with PDX. Though PHX could connect very well to the AA Network.
My guess would go with PDX. Though PHX could connect very well to the AA Network.
Feb 28, 2018, 8:11 am
#6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
Feb 28, 2018, 8:20 pm
#8
Moderator, All Nippon Airways and Japan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: NH SFC (*G), JL JGP (OWE), AS MVP, WOH E, IHG SE
Posts: 3,908
The Japanese version says a new "destination" so I suspect SEA, PDX, SJC in that order. Unless they consider DEN or PHX to be West Coast as well...
Feb 28, 2018, 8:23 pm
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tokyo
Programs: JAL Metal Card (OWE), SAS Eurobonus Gold (*G), Marriott Titanium (LTP), Tokyu Hotels Platinum
Posts: 21,158
Feb 28, 2018, 9:03 pm
#10
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pacific Wonderland
Programs: ʙᴏɴᴠo̱ʏ Au, IHG Au, HH Dia, Nexus, Pilot FlyingJ Preferred
Posts: 5,336
PDX is one of Alaska's hubs. I'd characterize it as strong for feed from PNW smaller cities, frequent shuttle flights between SEA (~40 minutes away) until the last year due to pilot shortages at their Horizon Air short haul subsidiary, a bit weaker to California second tier and smaller cities, and weaker still to any midcon or transcon destinations other than the largest markets. Biggest gap for feed to JAL might be lack of nonstop DEN-PDX.
Mar 1, 2018, 8:27 am
#13
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,842
I think it will be SEA.
No current Oneworld partner flies out of SEA to Asia and JL would be the first.
SEA to Asia traffic is growing a lot and would feed into JL routes.
MSFT, AMZN have HQ there and population is booming.
Lots of companies and disposable income to sustain pax count.
AS is also a good partner and the main hub at SEA would provide connections to other parts of N.America.
It wouldnt be SJC as there is SFO nearby.
Wouldnt be PDX, PHX, LAS as there isnt nearly enough traffic to Asia.
But i'm a bit biased...
No current Oneworld partner flies out of SEA to Asia and JL would be the first.
SEA to Asia traffic is growing a lot and would feed into JL routes.
MSFT, AMZN have HQ there and population is booming.
Lots of companies and disposable income to sustain pax count.
AS is also a good partner and the main hub at SEA would provide connections to other parts of N.America.
It wouldnt be SJC as there is SFO nearby.
Wouldnt be PDX, PHX, LAS as there isnt nearly enough traffic to Asia.
But i'm a bit biased...
Mar 1, 2018, 5:33 pm
#14
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: Free agent!
Posts: 1,427
Hoping for PDX but fully expecting SEA. However, at SEA JL has to compete with NH & DL directly and KE/OZ/HU/BR for onward traffic. The last time we saw three airlines on the SEA-TYO route, UA ended up dropping out.
Mar 1, 2018, 7:21 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,842
I think UA didnt succeed because they are the same alliance as NH and didnt have many onward connections to other parts of Asia from NRT.
The initial loads for NH on the SEA-NRT route when they started it were super light, like less than 50 pax in Y!
Now the NH flights are almost always high load.
JL would do much better as the only Oneworld partner and with plenty of connections in Asia.
Frankly, i am quite surprised there is up to now, still no Oneworld partner to Asia out of SEA.
The initial loads for NH on the SEA-NRT route when they started it were super light, like less than 50 pax in Y!
Now the NH flights are almost always high load.
JL would do much better as the only Oneworld partner and with plenty of connections in Asia.
Frankly, i am quite surprised there is up to now, still no Oneworld partner to Asia out of SEA.