Sir Francis Drake Hotel changing name??
#2
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Why would it be changed? Any hotel can change its name at virtually any time (but there can be restrictions if the brand is part of the name), but historical hotels tend to want to preserve their legacies.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA USA/Punta del Este, UY
Programs: AS 75K, AA EXP, Hilton Gold
Posts: 919
I received a note from a "Trumper" friend (?) who was all bent out of shape regarding a possible name change. She heard about a change on the radio. I am not trying to be political but was just curious as to whether IHG was thinking about a change.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,194
Saw something when I was reading one of the San Francicso papers the other day and a google search is always a good start
https://www.sfgate.com/travel/articl...e-15446229.php
Emphasis on the 'considering' not a certain change.
Remember though that the hotel is not owned by IHG but is privately owned but managed by Kimpton so IHG would have little say in what the hotel is called other than it not causing confusion with another property in the locality.
https://www.sfgate.com/travel/articl...e-15446229.php
Emphasis on the 'considering' not a certain change.
Remember though that the hotel is not owned by IHG but is privately owned but managed by Kimpton so IHG would have little say in what the hotel is called other than it not causing confusion with another property in the locality.
#5
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,020
Saw something when I was reading one of the San Francicso papers the other day and a google search is always a good start
https://www.sfgate.com/travel/articl...e-15446229.php
Emphasis on the 'considering' not a certain change.
Remember though that the hotel is not owned by IHG but is privately owned but managed by Kimpton so IHG would have little say in what the hotel is called other than it not causing confusion with another property in the locality.
https://www.sfgate.com/travel/articl...e-15446229.php
Emphasis on the 'considering' not a certain change.
Remember though that the hotel is not owned by IHG but is privately owned but managed by Kimpton so IHG would have little say in what the hotel is called other than it not causing confusion with another property in the locality.
With that said, I do find it curious that the name change consideration is from BLM movement and association of historic figures with slavery, and not because of brand confusion.