FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   India-Based Airlines (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/india-based-airlines-638/)
-   -   Any low-cost carriers moving to T3 at Delhi? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/india-based-airlines/1544792-any-low-cost-carriers-moving-t3-delhi.html)

intltravel90 Jan 24, 14 12:23 am

Any low-cost carriers moving to T3 at Delhi?
 
Hi,

For awhile, there was talk of the LCCs moving from 1D to 3 at IGI airport. Does anyone know if this is still in the pipeline, or what the timeline is?

Thanks.

Vishal Mehra Jan 24, 14 2:42 am

My opinion is 1D should be an exclusive low cost terminal, even for international ops. Makes it much easier for 6E, SG and others to transfer their pax seamlessly.

intltravel90 Jan 24, 14 2:53 am

I'd rather see them transfer to T3, which has more amenities and better connectivity, including the Airport Express line. Not to mention ease of connecting from one airline to another.

Regardless, I know there was discussion in 2011 of shifting all of these airlines to T3. What is the status of those talks?

It seems like a shortsighted move to charge different amounts to those using T1D and T3.

Keyser Jan 24, 14 5:04 am


Originally Posted by intltravel90 (Post 22212821)
Regardless, I know there was discussion in 2011 of shifting all of these airlines to T3. What is the status of those talks?

source????

intltravel90 Jan 24, 14 5:43 am

I remembered talk at the time, especially with the LCCs pushing to have intl flights out of 1D, for the shift to happen in the other direction (as it has, to a limited degree, at BOM). But to be fair, the only source I'm seeing now is Wikipedia, so perhaps my memory is hazy.

intltravel90 Jan 24, 14 5:44 am

Keyser, does your memory differ on this point?

Keyser Jan 24, 14 6:25 am


Originally Posted by intltravel90 (Post 22213237)
Keyser, does your memory differ on this point?

i recall hearing something about this some time back but it was more chatter than something that was in the pipeline....haven't heard anything on this topic now for a number of years....

PVDtoDEL Jan 25, 14 9:24 am

T3 has very high airport costs relative to T1D - if the LCCs moved, they would be even less competitive on price.

intltravel90 Jan 25, 14 9:25 am


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 22219782)
T3 has very high airport costs relative to T1D - if the LCCs moved, they would be even less competitive on price.

For sure. But why is that? It's the same airport operator, so they're choosing to disincentivize the LCCs from moving to T3. Don't you think they'd benefit from consolidation of services to the larger terminal (as long as it's not over capacity)?

PVDtoDEL Jan 25, 14 9:30 am


Originally Posted by intltravel90 (Post 22219790)
For sure. But why is that? It's the same airport operator, so they're choosing to disincentivize the LCCs from moving to T3. Don't you think they'd benefit from consolidation of services to the larger terminal (as long as it's not over capacity)?

T3 is more expensive to operate, therefore the airport operator charges higher fees. It's not that complicated :confused:

This debate is hardly unique to DEL anyway: http://crankyflier.com/2010/07/22/sa...-new-terminal/

intltravel90 Jan 25, 14 10:02 am


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 22219814)
T3 is more expensive to operate, therefore the airport operator charges higher fees. It's not that complicated :confused:

This debate is hardly unique to DEL anyway: http://crankyflier.com/2010/07/22/sa...-new-terminal/

Thanks for sharing the article. I agree that the airport operator needs to recoup the costs somehow. I'm simply commenting that if operations were consolidated at T3 (which, in general, has better facilities, etc), then the average costs would come down as the number of players goes up. So yes, IndiGo etc would pay marginally more - but not as much more as it initially seems.

intltravel90 Jan 25, 14 10:02 am

Of course, I'm sure you're correct that they've done the math on it and this doesn't make sense for any individual airline. It's just a question as to whether the operator will want to consolidate.

PVDtoDEL Jan 25, 14 10:11 am

Another factor which needs to be kept in mind is space constraints - it's more economical to keep operations in T1D than to expand T3. IGIA is expecting both domestic and international service to increase steadily in the coming years, as India continues to develop and AI continues to add service to its hub.

ashishp Jan 25, 14 10:56 am

It is my understanding that the consortium that manages DEL airport only agreed to pour in money to update T1 after an assurance that LCC's will continue to operate there.

International ops from T1 are held up due to some problem with Customs authorities.

intltravel90 Jan 25, 14 11:16 am


Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL (Post 22220007)
Another factor which needs to be kept in mind is space constraints - it's more economical to keep operations in T1D than to expand T3. IGIA is expecting both domestic and international service to increase steadily in the coming years, as India continues to develop and AI continues to add service to its hub.

That makes a lot of sense.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:54 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.