txhyattlvr

I moved to Hyatt from SPG (platinum - self-funded travel) because Hyatt is/WAS simply better. Better service, better consistency, better perks, better food, and (usually) better facilities. The fact that they are/WERE better justified the smaller number of hotels, less convenient locations, and (sometimes) higher prices.

For me, quality and overall value trumped convenience and scope. Yet, sadly, I feel things are changing and management feels NO need to be any better than the competition. But if they are no longer any better than SPG/Marriott, then why would any of us choose Hyatt over SPG/Marriott? I hope someone in Chicago realizes that one of Hyatt's biggest competitive advantages is/WAS simply being better.

For example, at the Hyatt Regency San Antonio over the past year or so they have....

1. Stopped putting water bottles in the rooms and offered up Chuck E Cheese style tickets you could exchange for a bottle of water at the gift shop. Thankfully they reversed this policy shortly after implementing it.

2. Removed shower gel from the rooms. Then they put it back.

3. Reduced the size of the Kenet MD products. Still the tiny bottles.

4. Eliminated full service room service for breakfast, replacing it with fast food-type items (burritos, mcmuffins, etc) delivered "take out" style in a paper/plastic bag, plastic utensils, etc. I know Hyatt Centric's are doing this, too.. (which sucks) but at least the food is "full service" and not fast food. As an aside, they push this as eco-friendly, but how can that be when everything gets thrown away after you eat? Isn't washing a plate more eco-friendly than throwing one away? Anyway...

5. Eliminated the **entire menu** in the restaurant for breakfast - now you can ONLY order the buffet. No more made to order full breakfasts at this hotel, period. Forget Eggs Benedict, it's not happening here anymore. On the plus side for them, now they need fewer cooks and fewer servers.

There still is a wonderful Hyatt staff, and it's a beautiful facility in a great location. Yet the staff IS obviously demoralized by the drip drip drip of downgrades. I am told these are "corporate" and "senior leadership" decisions.

At other Hyatt's we've seen some similar downgrades, not to mention the huge downgrade of the entire WOH program. I know most only care about points but we loved the check in amenity, and the nightly turn down service that both got eliminated with WOH. These little things made Hyatt better... and special.

I know much is "under review" at Hyatt and changes are underway. I also know of one other major hospitality company that went through a similar cycle years ago where they tried to cut costs everywhere, only to realize they made more money being a premium brand with a massive loyalty advantage. I hope Hyatt realizes the same thing...

dsquared37

Getting popcorn ready. These responses should be fun (and predictable).

Colin

never been more pleased with Hyatt in 10 years than now

JackE

How is the service better?

JetAway

You may be disappointed. Interest in Hyatt is waning on this board and likely more so after February 28th.

Aventine

I've noticed very little change at my Asian Hyatts.

hotturnip

Ha.

I was a Hyatt employee way back in the 1980s.

This "decline" has been going on . . . always. Everything is relative. Hyatt pretty much invented turn-down service with chocolates on the pillows. That ended decades ago. Remember also that most poperties are not owned by corporate, and are subject to their owners' individual commitment level to profit. I think the HR San Antonio used to be owned by Hunt Oil?

Anyhow, I feel your pain, but it's an old familiar song from where I stand.

stvr

Why is the assumption that the HR San Antonio value engineering is coming from Chicago? It sounds to me like whatever LLC owns this property is trying to juice its numbers in any way possible in so much as it is permissible. It sounds like you would like brand standards enforced to a higher level than Hyatt corporate is willing to do. I don’t think you’ll find better behavior from the bottom 10% of full service Marriotts or Hiltons.

3rdworldresident

To me, their brg program is the main reason why i gave up on them.

Tokyoite

Comparing your experience at a random Hyatt in San Antonio with the whole program is simple fallacy.
Give at least 5 anecdotal experience from both programs to even begin a comparison. I am not defending Hyatt (I have decamped to Marriot anyway), but Hyatt treats its elites well at most properties (qualifier = properties outside the North America). A comparison at flagship properties (in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul, Delhi, Maldives, London, Paris, Milan, Cape Town, Cairo, Rio, Lima etc,.) would result in an even result, if not slightly better for Hyatt.
But, the overall experiences dont differ much for each chain's elites. Of course, it depends on what you (as the elite) values the most.
Late check out? Lounge access? Upgrades? Waived auxiliary fees? Guaranteed last minute cash availability?

This discussion warranties some popcorn for the spectators (like me), but also, is indeed a poor use of time.

Just define what you (as the elite) values the most, chose wisely, and be loyal to the chain. What else can we hope for anyway?

txhyattlvr

I've confirmed from talking to staff here (that ARE Hyatt employees) that these changes are coming "from high up in Hyatt." We have also seen similar changes at other properties - San Antonio is a personal favorite hence the examples.

txhyattlvr

As customers we can make our voices heard and vote with our wallets. This causes change in companies ALL THE TIME. We've already seen some positive changes in WOH...

Another example (corporate run): Hyatt Regency Lake Washington. Gorgeous (new) facility, but a club lounge with literally no food (see lots of other reports). Then there's all the Centric's that have basically given up on room service.

Kacee

Same boat, and I agree. Don't really see Hyatt itself in decline. Hilton led the charge eliminating room service at large convention properties, and there are now Marriotts that are following a similar approach. I'm not a fan, but the fact is that hotels lose money on room service.

There are certain Hyatt properties that treat elites poorly, and those did leave a bad taste in my mouth. But there are quite a few properties where I was treated fabulously (Vienna, Zurich, Mayakoba . . . .).

Overall Marriott/SPG works better for me and I don't regret the switch at all. But Hyatt is still a good value proposition for those who can do 60 nights given the limited footprint, don't mind dealing with the award gaming, maddeningly inconsistent customer service, and occasionally hostile properties, and can stomach the appalling "WoH" branding and marketing.

Pickles

Reminds me of that old Catskills resort joke: The food here is awful, and the portions are so small!

Biggie Fries

Should be our FT motto.