Hong Kong/Macau e-Channel Suspension (Wuhan coronavirus outbreak)
Effective immediately, in response to Wuhan coronavirus outbreak and imposed travel restrictions, e-channel usages for all nonresidents for both Hong Kong and Macau are now suspended until further notice.
In other word, unless you have a HKID/Macau ID, you will not be able to use e-Channel in either places. |
I'm wondering why? Are immigration officers supposed to be scanning for signs of illness while they are collecting the silly immigration forms?
|
Somebody is, since residents of Hubei and those who've visited the province within the past 14 days are now prohibited from entering Hong Kong, unless they are HK residents.
|
Originally Posted by Gongzuokuang
(Post 32001774)
I'm wondering why? Are immigration officers supposed to be scanning for signs of illness while they are collecting the silly immigration forms?
|
What logic is there to assuming that HK residents are less likely to be carrying a disease and warrant less screening?
|
I don't make the rules, but I assume that there are some legal issues that would make barring return of permanent residents difficult. As well, the government can quarantine returning residents: they are still subject to health screening. Of course it can quarantine non-residents too, but since quarantine facilities are limited, why admit non-residents at high risk that might take up places at those facilities.
|
Originally Posted by Gongzuokuang
(Post 32001774)
I'm wondering why? Are immigration officers supposed to be scanning for signs of illness while they are collecting the silly immigration forms?
For arrival at the West Kowloon high-speed rail terminus on 2020-01-27, the main health-related thing was before immigration (for both the mainland and Hong Kong parts), where everybody had to complete a form about where the traveler had recently been, health symptoms, and contact details. The whole thing had a feeling of being recent; a Chinese-only sign was replaced with Chinese+English while I was waiting. I don't know the procedure at the airport; I arrived via the airport on 2020-01-24, but this was before this change. Actually, there was one additional interesting thing I noticed: the e-channel machine at the airport on 2020-01-24 gave me a slip for a 90-day stay, but the immigration officer at the West Kowloon terminus on 2020-01-27 gave me a slip for a 60-day stay. I don't know if this was related to the health issues or just a mistake. |
" . . . but the immigration officer at the West Kowloon terminus on 2020-01-27 gave me a slip for a 60-day stay."
I've always had the impression that this was done automatically by the computer, that to give less than 90 days (for Westerners, etc.) the immigration officer would have to make some positive intervention. |
Some differences entering HKG this time, at least for me:
1. Upon deboarding, noticed almost everyone and airport staff in masks. I have on sunglasses too, so one upped them on this "we're doing" something effort. 2. There are many more screeners along the way as one makes his way to immigration, and some with things to gauge temperature. I noticed they were screening those ages most likely at risk. 3. Immigration officer (skipped e-channel assuming it wouldn't work for me this time) asked if I've visited not only the affected areas but China in general for the last 14 days. Before I answered, he requested I remove my sunglasses and mask. 4. Never before seen any immigration officer anywhere, except ironically for the PRC, examine my Passport so thoroughly. LOL. Took some time for him to go through all the pages. And, that's it. With that, I'm in HK and hopefully won't bring this thing back to my home country. For this trip, think I'll just avoid crowds, live on room service, and just get out of here when my business is completed. Probably would keep my sunglasses & masks on the entire return flight and choose not to eat or drink anything. PS - Was advised goggles would be more effective, but I'd rather risk contracting this thing than looking that stupid. Imagine goggles in a suit, never live that one down. Since I know nothing about pathogens, I assume it's safest to have soup based dishes, since the boiling would have killed anything in it? |
Did you get a slip for the usual 90 days?
|
Originally Posted by 889
(Post 32005668)
Did you get a slip for the usual 90 days?
|
Originally Posted by Gongzuokuang
(Post 32001774)
I'm wondering why?
1. There is no way to know who has been Hubei for the last 14 days. So questioning is the only method. 2. The document scanner is not capable to identify document issued to Hubei residents.
Originally Posted by TA
(Post 32002335)
What logic is there to assuming that HK residents are less likely to be carrying a disease and warrant less screening?
Originally Posted by Cryofern
(Post 32003080)
I don't know if this was related to the health issues or just a mistake.
The visa-free travel is "up to" 90 days. So it is within the Immigration Department to give more or less, as soon as it does not exceed 90 days. Also - most travelers admit from West Kowloon only get 7 day. I would say it is a practice for West Kowloon to give fewer days. |
Mainland visitors need to fill out a health declaration form to submit to the immigration officer, who may question whether the visitor has been to the epicentre in the past 14 days. So they can't use the e-channels anymore.
|
Originally Posted by hkskyline
(Post 32010553)
Mainland visitors need to fill out a health declaration form to submit to the immigration officer, who may question whether the visitor has been to the epicentre in the past 14 days. So they can't use the e-channels anymore.
|
Originally Posted by :D!
(Post 32010806)
While HK residents cannot be denied entry to HK, shouldn't everyone entering HK, including HK residents, be asked where they have been recently?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:47 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.