Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Hilton | Hilton Honors
Reload this Page >

Doubletree's valet crashed my friend's car...

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Doubletree's valet crashed my friend's car...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2017, 8:44 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 35
Angry Doubletree's valet crashed my friend's car...

In July my friend's car was totaled (driven into a wall) by a valet at the Doubletree in Silver Spring, MD. Doubletree claims the brakes were not functioning properly ... the insurance claims have all been denied thus far. The car is not drivable and still sits in Doubletree's lot. I had him reach out to a few attorney but it seems they are not interested in these types of claims. Any other ideas for him?

gar598 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 9:02 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SFO
Programs: AY Plat, LH FTL
Posts: 7,370
Your friend should report the accident to his/her insurance and let's them fight the hotel over this.
DiverDave, Baracuda618 and hi55us like this.
work2fly is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 9:06 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 35
Originally Posted by work2fly
Your friend should report the accident to his/her insurance and let's them fight the hotel over this.
I guess he did ... he doesn't have collision and his insurance told him the below. Doubletree also mentioned the valet in question was fired the day after the incident.

"A third claim was filed based on subrogation with personal insurance and that was denied with instruction to direct claim to other insurance companies"
gar598 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 9:18 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ewing, NJ
Programs: OnePass, Delta
Posts: 244
No collision coverage?

That is the first issue, they self-insured.

The only other recourse, I can think of, is to get an estimate for repairs and take the hotel to court. Maybe small claims in this instance? Who knows until appraised.

Good luck and safe travels...
bo1953 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 9:20 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PEK, AUS, WAS, HKG
Programs: CX Gold
Posts: 1,122
Originally Posted by gar598
I guess he did ... he doesn't have collision and his insurance told him the below. Doubletree also mentioned the valet in question was fired the day after the incident.

"A third claim was filed based on subrogation with personal insurance and that was denied with instruction to direct claim to other insurance companies"
This is an interesting situation. So your friend did not carry collision so his own insurance company wouldn't do anything about it? In addition, I guess the hotel is ultimately liable for this accident and can be sued?
lixiaojuventus is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 9:26 am
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
As a starting point, if your friend's brakes failed, that is likely the end of any claim whether it is through or against the property, the valet or one insurance company or another. So, what is the answer to that question? You have a lot of detail, but left out the most important answer.

If your friend does not carry collision, he is SOL as to his own insurance and that is why his claim has been denied. His insurance company is not going to fight with anyone because it has no liability.

The claim is against the Doubletree and the valet (who may not have any money, so not worth fighting with).

If local attorneys who handle these sorts of cases won't take the case on, that is a pretty good indicator of where this case is headed. OP may certainly file in SCC and handle the case himself, but if the assertion that OP's brakes failed is true, the property will win whether OP handles the case in SCC or finds someone to take the case and pays him for his work.
dickinson likes this.
Often1 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 10:01 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Right here
Posts: 2,940
What doesn't add up is that:
1. The hotel claims the brakes failed
2. The valet in question was fired the day following the incident

If the hotel truly believes the car ran into a wall because the brakes failed, they would have no reason/cause to fire the valet (unless the valet was fired for something unrelated, but that would be a huge coincidence).
Loren Pechtel and notquiteaff like this.
clarence5ybr is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 12:06 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,907
Your friend should hire a reputable mechanic to go to the cars location and inspect the brakes for failure, if they find nothing wrong your friend has something to stand on against the valet and hotel. If they have not done this yet it is just a he/she said / they said situation and it will probably not go anywhere.
Baze is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 12:15 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Programs: HHonors Diamond, AA Executive Platinum, National Executive Elite, Avis First
Posts: 494
Also I would invoke the 100% satisfaction guarantee for the stay, lol.
adambrock is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 12:46 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,187
Originally Posted by clarence5ybr
What doesn't add up is that:
1. The hotel claims the brakes failed
2. The valet in question was fired the day following the incident

If the hotel truly believes the car ran into a wall because the brakes failed, they would have no reason/cause to fire the valet (unless the valet was fired for something unrelated, but that would be a huge coincidence).
Possibly fired for refusal of a mandatory employer drug/alcohol test?

I would sue hotel and valet in small claims court, if name us not disclosed you an sue as John Doe and file a motion for discovery to make hotel reveal employee name.
gar598 likes this.
expert7700 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 12:49 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,072
Originally Posted by gar598
In July my friend's car was totaled (driven into a wall) by a valet at the Doubletree in Silver Spring, MD. Doubletree claims the brakes were not functioning properly ... the insurance claims have all been denied thus far. The car is not drivable and still sits in Doubletree's lot. I had him reach out to a few attorney but it seems they are not interested in these types of claims. Any other ideas for him?

The hotel has no liability unless they can prove via CCTV that their employee crashed the car. I am sorry that this happened to your friend. Your friend may want to contact his insurance company and deal with Doubletree's insurance.

Also did your friend ask for a report? Were there any witnesses? Did your friend file a police report? Did your friend take photos of the damage? If your friend has a before and after photos that would help. Whenever you rent a car or park a car especially a new one its a good idea to take photos of it before handing it over to the valet or parking it.

If I had a theft or an accident at a hotel I would immediately take photos, make a report with the police , hotel management and get all witnesses information.

Sometimes its cheaper not to go through the insurance due to the cost of repair costing less than your premiums.

Without documentation the hotel could say it was a preexisting accident or damage. Your friend would need an attorney to get the CCTV footage if there is any.

If the accident was due to a break failure(a maintenance issue) then I am not sure how the hotel would be responsible. Your friend is lucky that no one got injured. What year is your friend's car? If it were me and I knew it was a maintenance issue I would just pay for the damages myself unless the valet was negligent and even then how can you prove it.

You take a risk leaving your car with a valet and they are not responsible for your valuables. There is a limited liability clause in their insurance policy and the hotel could say that because of the break failure your friend's car caused property damage.

I hope this helps and please keep us posted.
gar598 likes this.
danielonn is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 12:52 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 35
Thanks all ... the mechanic idea is good one. The below is a summary of events he has shared:

· Approximately 30 minutes after keys were turned over to parking valet, information was received that the car had been destroyed against a wall.

· The reason given was that the brakes were not working

· The car is a recent purchase and has been in use for weeks and the day leading up to the accident date.

· The car was up to date with its inspections and had no signs of faulty brakes

· The attendants were able to move the car at least two other times unassisted despite the stated brake failure

· A call to the entity regarding the accident was directed to the stated hotel manager

· The hotel manager provided incorrect insurance information directing me to Liberty Mutual Insurance

· A call to Liberty Mutual found that the hotel was not covered by them

· A second call to hotel resulted in direction to Sedgrick Insurance.

· A second call to the hotel also resulted in the discovery that the parking valet who was involved in personal vehicle loss was fired a day after the incident.

· Claims were filed for both and both were denied

· A third claim was filed based on subrogation with personal insurance and that was denied with instruction to direct claim to other insurance companies

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Sep 27, 2017 at 2:48 pm Reason: remove employee name per FT rules
gar598 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 1:02 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,072
Originally Posted by gar598
Thanks all ... the mechanic idea is good one. The below is a summary of events he has shared:
I would take the car to two mechanics for an estimate and send a letter and ask if in good faith could they cover at least 50 percent of the damage.

The accident happened in July and I assume your friend started the procedure then.

Another option is to take this to Judge Judy with all the evidence if you feel that Doubletree won't compensate your friend properly. Even just the thought of this from their legal team would want them to settle right away.

If the hotel manager provided incorrect insurance information then I would contact corporate for them to put your friend in touch with the District Manager and their Risk Management Department.

Providing false information to get out of a claim could be illegal. I would have your friend write a strong letter that emphasis this.
gar598 and hi55us like this.

Last edited by Kiwi Flyer; Sep 27, 2017 at 2:48 pm Reason: remove employee name per FT rules
danielonn is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 1:46 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ATL
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt LT DM, Wyndham DM, Hertz PC, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,038
I don't valet anything but if this thread holds true information if you valet your car your insurance is on the hook regardless of what the valet/company/hotel do with your car?

More reason to never let a valet touch your car. Pretty clear a valet crashed this person's car and the hotel/valet/company have completely washed their hands of the situation.
dinanm3atl is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2017, 2:26 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 6,072
Originally Posted by dinanm3atl
I don't valet anything but if this thread holds true information if you valet your car your insurance is on the hook regardless of what the valet/company/hotel do with your car?

More reason to never let a valet touch your car. Pretty clear a valet crashed this person's car and the hotel/valet/company have completely washed their hands of the situation.
I agree with you on this the valet company washed their hands over this.
danielonn is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.