Being hassled for "oversized" carry-on luggage
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Being hassled for "oversized" carry-on luggage
I offer the following as a PSA. This week, a family member travelling with me was hassled while boarding because she had a "personal item" that was not 100% compliant with Frontier's baggage requirements. It was an old "child's carry-on" that had offset wheels that extended, perhaps, a half-inch beyond the gate sizer. The rest of the bag fit into the sizer, but because the wheels slightly protruded from the bag, the bag sat about an inch above the sizer in one corner. The gate agent didn't care that the "violation" was silly or de minimus. She was going to charge whatever the silly gate fee was for an oversized bag. We just abandoned the basically worthless bag at the counter and put the bag's contents into a plastic bag and carried it on-board fee-free (the agent did not ask us to put the plastic bag in the sizer!).
I think it's nuts (and terrible customer service) to enforce carry-on bag rules to fractions of an inch -- especially when it comes to luggage wheels -- but Frontier can obviously do whatever they want to do on this. From years of experience with airlines that have strict "personal item" size limits, I find that it's always better to have a backpack on your back than a small suitcase. For some reason, gate agents never seem to think backpacks can be oversized but they are often suspicious of rolling suitcases, even very small ones. We had even measured the suitcase against Frontier's limits before travel, but didn't bother to measure the slightly protruding wheels.
I think it's nuts (and terrible customer service) to enforce carry-on bag rules to fractions of an inch -- especially when it comes to luggage wheels -- but Frontier can obviously do whatever they want to do on this. From years of experience with airlines that have strict "personal item" size limits, I find that it's always better to have a backpack on your back than a small suitcase. For some reason, gate agents never seem to think backpacks can be oversized but they are often suspicious of rolling suitcases, even very small ones. We had even measured the suitcase against Frontier's limits before travel, but didn't bother to measure the slightly protruding wheels.
#3
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
I don't fly Frontier for the LCC model but bags are either under the size limit (fit in the sizer) or over and don't. That bag didn't.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
In what way was your family member hassled?
F9 publishes the dimensions of authorized carry-ons and also publishes its fees:
https://www.flyfrontier.com/travel/t...o/bag-options/
Bag dimensions are binary. Either the bag meets the dimensions your relative agreed to when the ticket was purchase or it does not. The policy may be silly or not, but the time to make that decision is prior to purchasing the ticket.
I am not a fan of F9. But, whatever faults it has, it is clear about its policies and it enforces them.
F9 publishes the dimensions of authorized carry-ons and also publishes its fees:
https://www.flyfrontier.com/travel/t...o/bag-options/
Bag dimensions are binary. Either the bag meets the dimensions your relative agreed to when the ticket was purchase or it does not. The policy may be silly or not, but the time to make that decision is prior to purchasing the ticket.
I am not a fan of F9. But, whatever faults it has, it is clear about its policies and it enforces them.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
In this case, I think the gate agent should have said the bag is fine once she saw that it only failed "the sizer test" because of the tiny protrusion of the wheels (this was a 2-wheeled suitcase), but I guess nobody in management ever told the agent to use a rule of reason on this sort of thing.
And for those of you who see nothing wrong with an airline enforcing baggage rules in this manner, I suggest that you don't pursue a career in the hospitality industry. Personally, we didn't care about this nonsense -- we see the whole Frontier experience as a game, where we fly below cost due to their unsuccessful efforts to sell us ancillary stuff at high prices -- but I am certain this type of behavior would not sit well with a more typical customer.
Last edited by iahphx; Sep 27, 2019 at 10:18 pm
#6
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ATL
Programs: Global Entry, UA, AA, BA, DL, Bonvoy
Posts: 281
I think it's nuts (and terrible customer service) to enforce carry-on bag rules to fractions of an inch -- especially when it comes to luggage wheels -- but Frontier can obviously do whatever they want to do on this. From years of experience with airlines that have strict "personal item" size limits, I find that it's always better to have a backpack on your back than a small suitcase. For some reason, gate agents never seem to think backpacks can be oversized but they are often suspicious of rolling suitcases, even very small ones. We had even measured the suitcase against Frontier's limits before travel, but didn't bother to measure the slightly protruding wheels.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The bag's dimensions include wheels and handles. The only reason this bag was too large was that it was too large. Why it got too large was a purchasing choice made by OP's family member. This is true on all carriers. For what it is worth, AA has started rigidly enforcing its dimension policy for carry-on and it is a great thing.
Indeed the GA follows his employer's rules, as he should, and those rules are translated into easy-to-understand dimensions published on the F9 website and reflected in its sizer boxes.
Indeed the GA follows his employer's rules, as he should, and those rules are translated into easy-to-understand dimensions published on the F9 website and reflected in its sizer boxes.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 58
Personally, we didn't care about this nonsense -- we see the whole Frontier experience as a game, where we fly below cost due to their unsuccessful efforts to sell us ancillary stuff at high prices -- but I am certain this type of behavior would not sit well with a more typical customer.
#11
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PHL/EWR
Programs: AA, US, WN, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt Plat
Posts: 1,528
I had an old rollaboard that was just fractions of an inch too long when the wheels were included. In some models of planes it was impossible to close the overhead bin door unless the bag was stowed with the long direction oriented fore-aft rather than wheels in or out. That wasted a lot of space which inconvenienced other passengers with carry-on bags. When I replaced the bag I brought a tape measure with me to make sure the new bag (including wheels) was within the specified limits since many US and European airlines had begun to strictly enforce carry-on size limits. While shopping I found that the measurements listed on the manufacturer's packaging in most cases did NOT include wheel or spinner projections even though they claimed full compliance with airlines standards.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
It has preserved its brand. Its agents do not have discretion, it is known that they do not have discretion, and the problem becomes that if F9 starts accepting bags which are a "little" over, that becomes the new standard and then it is a "little over" that.
The reality is that people who say that they are "walking" rarely do. The people who get annoyed when they see others getting away with scamming that baggage (or other rules) is that it upsets them that they either paid the fee or managed to measure their bag before heading to the airport.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,404
Personally, I was surprised at how this agent strictly enforced (to perhaps a quarter inch on a protruding wheel) their baggage policy. I hadn't seen this happen at Frontier before. It didn't matter to us -- the old bag we were using only had value as a Frontier carry-on, and had zero value if it was going to be a source of friction while flying Frontier. Putting the contents into a plastic laundry bag was simply a minor inconvenience. I do think this incident will "matter" to others when they select their "personal item" for Frontier. As I said before, I'd go for a backpack.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
I don't know where people get this stuff. There is no rule that a personal item can't go in the overhead bin. The requirement is that it must be able to fit under the seat, and if it was too large it may not have. Most of the time on Frontier the overhead bins are pretty empty, because they charge more for a carry-on than for a checked bag.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
Programs: Amex MR, Southwest RR
Posts: 57
Personally, I was surprised at how this agent strictly enforced (to perhaps a quarter inch on a protruding wheel) their baggage policy. I hadn't seen this happen at Frontier before. It didn't matter to us -- the old bag we were using only had value as a Frontier carry-on, and had zero value if it was going to be a source of friction while flying Frontier. Putting the contents into a plastic laundry bag was simply a minor inconvenience. I do think this incident will "matter" to others when they select their "personal item" for Frontier. As I said before, I'd go for a backpack.
Clearly, one of the massive hiking backpacks wouldn't qualify, but will I get hassled for a simple backpack with a change of clothes, a laptop and a few extras? My goal, of course, is to take ONLY a backpack and no additional carry-on.