![]() |
Originally Posted by writerguyfl
(Post 24428139)
It's "Greek" to me...at least when I'm using Internet Explorer. It's okay on Firefox. IE screenshot:
http://my-content-locker.com/temp/tr...irportinfo.jpg Looking at your code, the problem is (probably) CSS-based. The text in question is set to "font-family: symbol". There appear to be 10 different style sheets attached. Somewhere in there, IE is getting confused. Come on, what's with the Greek? Is your site getting a lot of hits from Athens? Or Astoria, Queens? :) |
Originally Posted by EricR111
(Post 24429877)
Jerseyguy:
Come on, what's with the Greek? Is your site getting a lot of hits from Athens? Or Astoria, Queens? :) |
Last year it seemed that Frontier added many destinations at TTN to keep the buzz going there. Many were Midwest cities that Frontier already had presence into with DEN based service, but weren't major draws in terms of destinations. Low fares were also found in a few markets (BNA and STL) out of PHL or EWR if Southwest competed there.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time. Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO. |
Originally Posted by rtalk25
(Post 24434603)
Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO.
TTN still has three aircraft assigned to it, but rather than "spread it round" with 3 or 4 x weeklies to more cities, they are concentrating on a reduced number of cities, and with daily service - MSP and CLT, e.g. - as well as increases on the prime markets. The exception at TTN is UST, which continues at 3 x weekly. Are the glory days off rapid expansion at TTN over? Probably, for a while at least, but that's partly Frontier and its aircraft situation and partly TTN with its terminal situation. |
Originally Posted by rtalk25
(Post 24434603)
Last year it seemed that Frontier added many destinations at TTN to keep the buzz going there. Many were Midwest cities that Frontier already had presence into with DEN based service, but weren't major draws in terms of destinations. Low fares were also found in a few markets (BNA and STL) out of PHL or EWR if Southwest competed there.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time. Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO. |
Originally Posted by EricR111
(Post 24438587)
I still think that one seasonal destination that should have been tried is MYR. It's not going to happen with the new F9, however.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.