New Route Cuts Including Newark
#91
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
I could see UA upgauging MKE-EWR to at least a CR7, and US doing the same for MKE-PHL
Beyond that I can't see WN doing much from MKE to other than their own focus cities. Going to other hubs will be a disaster, and WN has already shown that it can't compete with even US.
Beyond that I can't see WN doing much from MKE to other than their own focus cities. Going to other hubs will be a disaster, and WN has already shown that it can't compete with even US.
#92
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
You can ask US' ex-employees in BWI and LAS about that, where WN's domination was total.
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
Purely speculation, but I can't realistically see WN keeping a transitioned MKE any larger than they have kept BNA pre-ATL. That would be 24 cities. Right now at MKE, the combined WN+FL has somewhere in the high 20s - I want to say 27 after you take out the duplicates, but I may be off by a couple.
But I can just as easily see WN take MKE down further to 19-20 cities, more like a SAN or an OAK. I don't think they'll take it far down as a RDU or and SLC, with only 13-14 cities.
But I can just as easily see WN take MKE down further to 19-20 cities, more like a SAN or an OAK. I don't think they'll take it far down as a RDU or and SLC, with only 13-14 cities.
Last edited by ElmhurstNick; Feb 15, 2012 at 2:16 pm
#94
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
- Core connections: ATL, BWI, STL, MCI, DEN
- Secondary connections: BNA, HOU, PHX, LAS
- Business markets: LGA, BOS, MSP, LAX
- Sunny markets (seasonal?): TPA, MCO, FLL, CUN
#95
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
Purely speculation, but I can't realistically see WN keeping a transitioned MKE any larger than they have kept BNA pre-ATL. That would be 24 cities. Right now at MKE, the combined WN+FL has somewhere in the high 20s - I want to say 27 after you take out the duplicates, but I may be off by a couple.
But I can just as easily see WN take MKE down further to 19-20 cities, more like a SAN or an OAK. I don't think they'll take it far down as a RDU or and SLC, with only 13-14 cities.
But I can just as easily see WN take MKE down further to 19-20 cities, more like a SAN or an OAK. I don't think they'll take it far down as a RDU or and SLC, with only 13-14 cities.
Southwest should be able to function from MKE with a route network like the following at about 48-50 flights per weekday:
- Core connections: ATL, BWI, STL, MCI, DEN
- Secondary connections: BNA, HOU, PHX, LAS
- Business markets: LGA, BOS, MSP, LAX
- Sunny markets (seasonal?): TPA, MCO, FLL, CUN
- Core connections: ATL, BWI, STL, MCI, DEN
- Secondary connections: BNA, HOU, PHX, LAS
- Business markets: LGA, BOS, MSP, LAX
- Sunny markets (seasonal?): TPA, MCO, FLL, CUN
Last edited by MikeFromMKE; Feb 15, 2012 at 7:53 pm
#96
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,912
The service cuts and layoffs show Frontier has lost the Milwaukee battle with Southwest and AirTran that started in 2009, Sorensen said. Frontier's owner, Republic Airways Holdings Inc., is seeking a buyer for the airline, but Sorensen believes those efforts are futile.
"This airline will fail," he said. "There's nothing left to buy."
I do find it interesting though that he thinks WN is likely to pick up MKE-EWR/PHL.
"This airline will fail," he said. "There's nothing left to buy."
I do find it interesting though that he thinks WN is likely to pick up MKE-EWR/PHL.
It's good to see WN's success at MKE and DEN, despite the NW phony-baloney captial infusion.
Last edited by MikeFromMKE; Feb 16, 2012 at 7:59 am
#97
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
#99
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RDU
Programs: AA LT Gold, DL SM, HY Disc, Marriott LT Gold
Posts: 12,507
I meant more in terms of the number of non-stop destinations, not the number of flights. OAK has a lot of high-volume routes, where I don't think any destination from MKE would be more than 4x/day and many would only be 2x/day.
#100
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: America's Dairyland
Programs: Midwest Miles, Early Returns
Posts: 156
Quote: MCO will probably be cut in September (I'm surprised they're even keeping it this summer with AirTran going up to 4x daily).
I'm surprised they would drop MKE-MCO. I fly that fairly regularly and it's usually very full. Of course I'm not on it every day...
I'm surprised they would drop MKE-MCO. I fly that fairly regularly and it's usually very full. Of course I'm not on it every day...
#101
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
A full flight doesn't mean full profits.
#102
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,159
I believe delta flies to MSP, DTW and to ATL more then that. I know delta flies to MSP at least 7 times a day on mainline aircraft.
#104
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver
Posts: 1,818
Having lived in Chicago, there are a number of Chicagoans who will drive (or take the train) to MKE rather than ORD or MDW, plus the people who actually live in MKE, so I think MKE will always have a greater level of service than other cities of similar size, but I think the hub days are gone.
#105
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Southwest in PHL still has 50% more flights than US has out of LAS. As for 5-year trends in PHX, I don't have any data at hand. That puts US' record vs. WN at no better than 1-2-1 in my book.