FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Frontier Airlines EarlyReturns (Pre-Alignment) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/frontier-airlines-earlyreturns-pre-alignment-491/)
-   -   New Cities (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/frontier-airlines-earlyreturns-pre-alignment/790444-new-cities.html)

ncorman Feb 14, 2008 12:00 am

New Cities
 
On Thursday 2/14 the following cities will be announced.

Aspen, Colorado Springs, Durango, Grand Junction, Bozeman, Missoula, Fargo and Jackson Hole.

There is also suppose to be changes in frequencies as well. The new cities are already on the route map on their website.

N830MH Feb 14, 2008 12:06 am


Originally Posted by ncorman (Post 9248910)
On Thursday 2/14 the following cities will be announced.

Aspen, Colorado Springs, Durango, Grand Junction, Bozeman, Missoula, Fargo and Jackson Hole.

There is also suppose to be changes in frequencies as well. The new cities are already on the route map on their website.

It's should be officially news releasable tomorrow morning. I'll post there in the morning. Thanks for clarifications which specific new routes from DEN. I will find out which frequencies will be changeable at DEN.

loboclone Feb 14, 2008 4:34 am

Looks like Lynx got more Q400 planes, turboprop ho...........

N830MH Feb 14, 2008 11:11 am

It's official releasable from F9
 
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080214/lath067.html?.v=101

Also, F9 will adds some routes from DEN-ANC/YVR during summer seasonal.

Here I have some of those flight scheduled subject to change without noticeable. Here it is:


Key: M = Mainline Airbus service
L = Lynx Q400 service
R = Republic E170 service


Frontier Flight Current Spring/Summer New Total
Changes (one-way Daily Schedule Change Departures
segments listed by Departures
market)
DEN to ASE 0 + 5 L (May 15) 5
DEN to COS 0 + 5 L (April 15) 5
DEN to DRO 0 + 3 L (May 15) 3
DEN to GJT 0 + 4 L (May 15) 4
DEN to BZN 0 + 2 L, 1 R (May 22) 3
DEN TO FAR 0 + 2 R (May 12) 2
DEN TO MSO 0 + 2 R, 1 L (May 16) 3
DEN TO JAC 0 + 3 L (May 15) 3
DEN TO PDX 4 + 1 M 5
DEN TO SEA 3 + 3 M (by July 1) 6
DEN TO SMF 3 + 1 M 4
DEN TO SJC 3 + 1 M 4
DEN TO IND 4 + 1 M 5
DEN TO DTW 3 + 1 M 4
DEN TO LGA 2 + 1 M 3
DEN TO BNA 3 + 1 M 4
DEN TO SFO 5 + 1 M 6
DEN TO MSP 4 + 1 M 5
DEN TO CAK 2 + 1 M 3
DEN TO ANC 0 + 1 M (seasonal) 1
DEN TO YVR 0 + 1 M (seasonal) 1
DEN TO GEG 3 + 1 R 4
DEN TO BIL 3 + 1 L 4
Thanks all. :)

GreatChecko Feb 14, 2008 12:15 pm


Originally Posted by loboclone (Post 9249535)
Looks like Lynx got more Q400 planes, turboprop ho...........

They still only have the original 10 and will into at least next year. There will be some shifting of aircraft around the system to better match demands and to free up thre Q's for the mountain service.

N830MH Feb 14, 2008 3:18 pm

I have been heard F9 has been discontinuation some routes from DEN-PBI/BTR. Because its didn't last longer. Also, both RSW/JAX will shifting to seasonal but, it will be not operate for summer seasonal. Hopefully if F9 will continuation to service for JAX & RSW during winter/fall/spring.

Max The Distance Feb 29, 2008 8:06 pm

Bozeman is a good destination city for getting to Yellow Stone. Woot!

DenverBrian Feb 29, 2008 8:36 pm

If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?

(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D)

GreatChecko Feb 29, 2008 9:27 pm


Originally Posted by DenverBrian (Post 9339063)
If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?

(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D)

Whichever one is cheaper like the rest of the country would?

I don't think you have much to worry about, assumming UA doesn't wire the antiskid wrong (again):D

************************************************** **********
NTSB ADVISORY
************************************************** **********
National Transportation Safety Board
Washington, DC 20594
February 29, 2008
************************************************** **********
SAFETY BOARD ISSUES UPDATE ON JACKSON HOLE RUNWAY EXCURSION
************************************************** **********
In its continuing investigation of an incident in which a
United Airlines Airbus A-320 jetliner departed the runway
during landing at Wyoming's Jackson Hole Airport on the
evening of February, 25, 2008, the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) has developed the following factual
information during its on-scene investigation.
The airplane came to rest 116 feet past the end of the
runway and 140 feet to the right of the runway centerline.
A heavy skid mark was found on the runway associated with
the inboard tire of the left main landing gear. This tire
was found deflated and showed wear consistent with a skid.
Upon exiting the runway, both engines ingested snow and
sustained internal damage. The aircraft itself was not
substantially damaged.
Examination of the left main landing gear brakes revealed
that the inboard and outboard wheel speed tachometer wires
were cross-connected.
Such a configuration would be likely
to cause the antiskid system to use the inboard wheel speed
to control the outboard braking, and vice versa. In such a
situation, it would be likely that when the inboard tire
began to skid, the antiskid system would release the
pressure on the outboard brake instead of the inboard brake.

Examination of maintenance records indicated that both main
landing gear units were replaced on the incident airplane in
early February 2008. The Safety Board is also investigating
another United A-320 incident with similar circumstances
that occurred on October 9, 2007
(see CHI08IA026 at
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...023X01635&key=
1).
Another area of the investigation is the inoperability of
one of the emergency evacuation slides. The slide at the
front left door deployed when the door was opened during the
evacuation but did not inflate. The manufacturer of the
slide will assist the NTSB in its investigation of the cause
of the failure.
Information obtained from the flight data recorder (FDR) and
the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) is being analyzed at the
Safety Board's laboratory in Washington.
Investigators are continuing to gather factual information
in aircraft performance, human factors and other areas.
###
NTSB Public Affairs: Peter Knudson
(202) 314-6100
[email protected]

boxedlunch Mar 1, 2008 3:45 pm

I suppose that they're going to try and compete directly w/ UAL from COS?

Daze Mar 2, 2008 2:44 pm


Originally Posted by DenverBrian (Post 9339063)
If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?

(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D)

Agreed. But, what if the choice is a Lynx Q400 or a UX CRJ?

Now we have a ballgame...

DenverBrian Mar 2, 2008 8:49 pm


Originally Posted by Daze (Post 9346052)
Agreed. But, what if the choice is a Lynx Q400 or a UX CRJ?

Now we have a ballgame...

Non sequitur. In the off seasons, it looks like the choice will be the Lynx...or a Dash-8 operated by (shudder) Mesa! F9 will win the offseason for sure. Unfortunately, the offseason for DEN-JAC is really only 3-4 months out of the year. Most of the time, I'd choose the A319 mainline.

haddon90 Mar 7, 2008 2:49 pm

i wonder if F9 will ever go to TYS...probably not


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:39 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.