![]() |
New Cities
On Thursday 2/14 the following cities will be announced.
Aspen, Colorado Springs, Durango, Grand Junction, Bozeman, Missoula, Fargo and Jackson Hole. There is also suppose to be changes in frequencies as well. The new cities are already on the route map on their website. |
Originally Posted by ncorman
(Post 9248910)
On Thursday 2/14 the following cities will be announced.
Aspen, Colorado Springs, Durango, Grand Junction, Bozeman, Missoula, Fargo and Jackson Hole. There is also suppose to be changes in frequencies as well. The new cities are already on the route map on their website. |
Looks like Lynx got more Q400 planes, turboprop ho...........
|
It's official releasable from F9
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080214/lath067.html?.v=101
Also, F9 will adds some routes from DEN-ANC/YVR during summer seasonal. Here I have some of those flight scheduled subject to change without noticeable. Here it is: Key: M = Mainline Airbus service L = Lynx Q400 service R = Republic E170 service Frontier Flight Current Spring/Summer New Total Changes (one-way Daily Schedule Change Departures segments listed by Departures market) DEN to ASE 0 + 5 L (May 15) 5 DEN to COS 0 + 5 L (April 15) 5 DEN to DRO 0 + 3 L (May 15) 3 DEN to GJT 0 + 4 L (May 15) 4 DEN to BZN 0 + 2 L, 1 R (May 22) 3 DEN TO FAR 0 + 2 R (May 12) 2 DEN TO MSO 0 + 2 R, 1 L (May 16) 3 DEN TO JAC 0 + 3 L (May 15) 3 DEN TO PDX 4 + 1 M 5 DEN TO SEA 3 + 3 M (by July 1) 6 DEN TO SMF 3 + 1 M 4 DEN TO SJC 3 + 1 M 4 DEN TO IND 4 + 1 M 5 DEN TO DTW 3 + 1 M 4 DEN TO LGA 2 + 1 M 3 DEN TO BNA 3 + 1 M 4 DEN TO SFO 5 + 1 M 6 DEN TO MSP 4 + 1 M 5 DEN TO CAK 2 + 1 M 3 DEN TO ANC 0 + 1 M (seasonal) 1 DEN TO YVR 0 + 1 M (seasonal) 1 DEN TO GEG 3 + 1 R 4 DEN TO BIL 3 + 1 L 4 |
Originally Posted by loboclone
(Post 9249535)
Looks like Lynx got more Q400 planes, turboprop ho...........
|
I have been heard F9 has been discontinuation some routes from DEN-PBI/BTR. Because its didn't last longer. Also, both RSW/JAX will shifting to seasonal but, it will be not operate for summer seasonal. Hopefully if F9 will continuation to service for JAX & RSW during winter/fall/spring.
|
Bozeman is a good destination city for getting to Yellow Stone. Woot!
|
If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?
(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D) |
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
(Post 9339063)
If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?
(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D) I don't think you have much to worry about, assumming UA doesn't wire the antiskid wrong (again):D ************************************************** ********** NTSB ADVISORY ************************************************** ********** National Transportation Safety Board Washington, DC 20594 February 29, 2008 ************************************************** ********** SAFETY BOARD ISSUES UPDATE ON JACKSON HOLE RUNWAY EXCURSION ************************************************** ********** In its continuing investigation of an incident in which a United Airlines Airbus A-320 jetliner departed the runway during landing at Wyoming's Jackson Hole Airport on the evening of February, 25, 2008, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has developed the following factual information during its on-scene investigation. The airplane came to rest 116 feet past the end of the runway and 140 feet to the right of the runway centerline. A heavy skid mark was found on the runway associated with the inboard tire of the left main landing gear. This tire was found deflated and showed wear consistent with a skid. Upon exiting the runway, both engines ingested snow and sustained internal damage. The aircraft itself was not substantially damaged. Examination of the left main landing gear brakes revealed that the inboard and outboard wheel speed tachometer wires were cross-connected. Such a configuration would be likely to cause the antiskid system to use the inboard wheel speed to control the outboard braking, and vice versa. In such a situation, it would be likely that when the inboard tire began to skid, the antiskid system would release the pressure on the outboard brake instead of the inboard brake. Examination of maintenance records indicated that both main landing gear units were replaced on the incident airplane in early February 2008. The Safety Board is also investigating another United A-320 incident with similar circumstances that occurred on October 9, 2007 (see CHI08IA026 at http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...023X01635&key= 1). Another area of the investigation is the inoperability of one of the emergency evacuation slides. The slide at the front left door deployed when the door was opened during the evacuation but did not inflate. The manufacturer of the slide will assist the NTSB in its investigation of the cause of the failure. Information obtained from the flight data recorder (FDR) and the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) is being analyzed at the Safety Board's laboratory in Washington. Investigators are continuing to gather factual information in aircraft performance, human factors and other areas. ### NTSB Public Affairs: Peter Knudson (202) 314-6100 [email protected] |
I suppose that they're going to try and compete directly w/ UAL from COS?
|
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
(Post 9339063)
If I'm considering DEN-JAC and the choice is F9 on a Lynx or UA on a mainline A319...guess which one I'm choosing?
(Assuming it says on the runway, of course. :D :D :D) Now we have a ballgame... |
Originally Posted by Daze
(Post 9346052)
Agreed. But, what if the choice is a Lynx Q400 or a UX CRJ?
Now we have a ballgame... |
i wonder if F9 will ever go to TYS...probably not
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:39 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.