![]() |
New FTC guidelines re comp'd trips & such
Say you’re planning a vacation. You do some research and find a glowing review on someone’s blog that a particular resort is the most luxurious place he has ever stayed. If you knew the hotel had paid the blogger hundreds of dollars to say great things about it or that the blogger had stayed there for several days for free, it could affect how much weight you’d give the blogger’s endorsement. The blogger should, therefore, let his readers know about that relationship. It will be interesting to see how this is adopted within the community. |
law enforcement actions can result in orders requiring the defendants in the case to give up money they received from their violations |
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
(Post 24923816)
what has the history of this been?
Arguably the recent spate of posts about Clear should have been disclosed as ads under these rules, too. |
IIRC there was a previous thing from FTC about social media, dont recall what it was
|
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
(Post 24924057)
IIRC there was a previous thing from FTC about social media, dont recall what it was
Basically, in the past people would say that they didn't receive "real" payment so the comp'd trip disclosure was not required as it was not a paid event. This changes that. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 24923773)
Previously comp'd trips were considered (by some) part of the regular way of doing business and not requiring disclosure. The new FTC guidelines now suggest that any communication about such, from a tweet to a full blog post, is considered sponsored content and must be disclosed as such. :eek:
It will be interesting to see how this is adopted within the community. |
Originally Posted by cruisr
(Post 24924548)
I'm in favor of it. What would be the negative to the readers of a blogger saying the trip was comped?
The negative is for the vendor, who buys the blogger's good review with comped accommodations. Because now folks will know the good review was bought rather than organic. My company sponsors a few of bloggers by comping stuff to them. But our lawyers are very conservative and already require massive disclosure about the relationship. |
Originally Posted by kokonutz
(Post 24925277)
My company sponsors a few of bloggers by comping stuff to them. But our lawyers are very conservative and already require massive disclosure about the relationship.
|
It's about time someone cracked down on this. It started out small, with the entire blogging industry, and now it's just another advertising expense.
Just like Google & yahoo have to report that search results are sponsored and ads marked as such, bloggers should have to do the same. |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 24926002)
Does that disclosure include tagging every tweet with "AD" in some form or another? If not you're probably acting counter to the new rules.
Much to my chagrin. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:23 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.