Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > External Miles and Points Resources
Reload this Page >

One Mile at a Time [OMaaT] discussions [merged]

One Mile at a Time [OMaaT] discussions [merged]

Old Jun 8, 2017, 2:18 am
  #3301  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Programs: *G, oneworld Sapphire
Posts: 100
Honestly I think OMAAT would be 100% more enjoyable if it was run by Tiffany and people like her.
LeaveYourDailyHell is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 3:53 am
  #3302  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,272
Originally Posted by Raffles
The key for Ben, very simply, is whether the blog would still thrive if he wasn't travelling, because long term it isn't sustainable. I have no doubt that it is, either with travel reviews shared out among a broader team or the blog simply losing that element of it (which is a small percentage of the articles anyway).
Could the blog exist? Yes. Would it generate enough money for a full-time career? Probably not. He could shift to a more explicit credit card sales model, but that market is pretty saturated as is. The "I'm going to show you how to travel for free step by step" market isn't sustainable, and I think you'll start to see those blogs folding. Bens whole shtick, and what allows him to continue new customer acquisition, is his aspirational travel and personal "story". Without it, he isn't marketable.
Adam1222 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 4:32 am
  #3303  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Originally Posted by Adam1222
Today in unawareness/entitlement - in re threats of imprisonment for people who support Qatar in the UAE, no criticism whatsoever of totalitarianism, just a post with no actual judgment, just " Hopefully it’s okay that I still consider Qatar Airways’ new business class to be slightly better than Emirates’ business class. ��"

Yes, this whole situation is so funny, Ben. All those people who will be arrested or imprisoned are cute, but you like the new lie-flats.
The UAE isn't a totalitarian state; it's an authoritarian state with a federal system run by a collection of monarchs and the favorite family members and friends of such. What does OMAAT gain for its business by cannon-balling into a pool of domestic or international politics? How does the publicly-identified principal's self-interest in travel get advanced by engaging in acts that may cause the individual a problem during travels to or via a place?

He seems to have awareness about the systems in which he operates.

Publicly expressing judgmental opinions in the most explicit way someone else may desire isn't a necessary requirement to have judgmental opinions. But not being so explicit may be a way to stay out of trouble, even in places like Denmark, France, Germany, Turkey, the UK, the US, or many other such places where verbal or written expressions can attract adverse law enforcement attention and action.

Some could take his mention about QR being better than EK and whether or not that may be ok in the current environment as part of a dig against the UAE's crackdown on people defending Qatar against attacks of sort coming from Trumplandia, the KSA and the UAE.

Last edited by GUWonder; Jun 8, 2017 at 4:38 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 7:01 am
  #3304  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,272
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The UAE isn't a totalitarian state; it's an authoritarian state with a federal system run by a collection of monarchs and the favorite family members and friends of such. What does OMAAT gain for its business by cannon-balling into a pool of domestic or international politics? How does the publicly-identified principal's self-interest in travel get advanced by engaging in acts that may cause the individual a problem during travels to or via a place?

He seems to have awareness about the systems in which he operates.

Publicly expressing judgmental opinions in the most explicit way someone else may desire isn't a necessary requirement to have judgmental opinions. But not being so explicit may be a way to stay out of trouble, even in places like Denmark, France, Germany, Turkey, the UK, the US, or many other such places where verbal or written expressions can attract adverse law enforcement attention and action.

Some could take his mention about QR being better than EK and whether or not that may be ok in the current environment as part of a dig against the UAE's crackdown on people defending Qatar against attacks of sort coming from Trumplandia, the KSA and the UAE.
He chose to write a blog post about the risk of imprisonment for speaking. He didn't have to do so.

As for what business purpose it would have served for him to express any sort of thought about how that is wrong? I have more respect for businesses led by people with a moral compass. And I patronize them more. Of course, your post presupposes that Ben is not a travel writer, with any responsibility to objectivity or the truth, but9 rather a purely self-motivated businessman.

I agree I misspoke with my reference to totalitarianism instead of authoritarianism, which makes no difference. People with audiences have a moral obligation to condemn injustice. If Bens business relies on his systematic silence and acquiescence to significant human rights violations, then that is sad. It's not like Ben's business is something like a food or energy producer where you can argue there's an inherent value. He blogs about getting treated nice by airlines and hotels.


Sometimes you do things because they are right, even if they aren't good for business. That's kind of a sign of a good human being.

Last edited by Adam1222; Jun 8, 2017 at 7:08 am
Adam1222 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 7:33 am
  #3305  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Originally Posted by Adam1222
He chose to write a blog post about the risk of imprisonment for speaking. He didn't have to do so.

As for what business purpose it would have served for him to express any sort of thought about how that is wrong? I have more respect for businesses led by people with a moral compass. And I patronize them more. Of course, your post presupposes that Ben is not a travel writer, with any responsibility to objectivity or the truth, but9 rather a purely self-motivated businessman.

I agree I misspoke with my reference to totalitarianism instead of authoritarianism, which makes no difference. People with audiences have a moral obligation to condemn injustice. If Bens business relies on his systematic silence and acquiescence to significant human rights violations, then that is sad. It's not like Ben's business is something like a food or energy producer where you can argue there's an inherent value. He blogs about getting treated nice by airlines and hotels.


Sometimes you do things because they are right, even if they aren't good for business. That's kind of a sign of a good human being.
Do you expect miles/points and travel bloggers and all those writing about the US (as part of such) to publicly, loudly, explicitly and repeatedly condem the death penalty, police brutality and mass incarceration in the US when the US federal government and various US states participate in such acts that are considered significant human rights violations by many too? If so, does that mean that we should be flagging down as a "bad human being" anyone (with an audience) who mentions an airline based in Texas or Georgia or talks about flying to/within the US, or on a US carrier, without engaging in the vociferous motions of engaging in a politicized monologue of sorts critical of such perceived injustice?

I have been provided no evidence that OMAAT's founder is a bad human being. I do find that a lot of the personal criticism speaks poorly of the critics as it seems to be but an attempt to bully someone to act in a way that isn't necessarily all that natural to a person. Perhaps bullies are all great human beings?

Last edited by GUWonder; Jun 8, 2017 at 7:43 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 8:19 am
  #3306  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,865
Originally Posted by Adam1222
Could the blog exist? Yes. Would it generate enough money for a full-time career? Probably not.
Come off it. If Ben stopped writing tomorrow there are enough links on the site which are referenced by Google to get him the 1 Chase sale per day he needs for $100k of annual revenue.
Raffles is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 8:20 am
  #3307  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Programs: *G, oneworld Sapphire
Posts: 100
Personally, I think just he's an obnoxious child (albeit one who looks 40+).
LeaveYourDailyHell is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 8:30 am
  #3308  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FIND ME ON TWITTER FOR THE LATEST
Posts: 27,730
Originally Posted by Adam1222
...People with audiences have a moral obligation to condemn injustice.
No they don't.
JonNYC is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2017, 10:39 am
  #3309  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,272
Originally Posted by JonNYC
No they don't.
That's something that perhaps reasonable people can disagree with - moral obligations are, by definition, based on one's own code of morals. But it's hardly a radical opinion that people who have platforms in media should use them for things other than their personal gain. It sounds trite, but I've taken to heart something a teacher wrote in my high school yearbook 20 years ago, "From those whom much is given, much is expected."

GUWonder, you are really setting up a strawman here, and ignoring my point. ONCE BEN MADE THE DELIBERATE DECISION TO POST ABOUT CENSORSHIP IN THE UAE, it is nowhere close to the suggestion about talking about airlines based in Georgia and an obligation to post about unrelated issues.
The more apt comparison would be if a blogger were to make a post about the death penalty in Texas, and without saying anything critical about it, made a joke "hope I don't get electrocuted when I drop by the United Club!"
I would consider that person to be amoral.

As for the suggestion that I am a bully for critiquing a public blog post for making light of the repression of free speech, that's kind of inane. Really, that's an insult to real victims of bullying. If anything, you're bullying me for daring to critique a public, commercial post and suggesting that businesses should be held to a standard of corporate responsibility. Holding Ben accountable for his public acts with pretty well-thought-out reasons that you happen to disagree with isn't "bullying," snowflake.

Raffles, Ben could not support his lifestyle on $100k in revenue per year. (Putting aside that the links in old content don't stay good forever, and 5/24 plus market saturation contradict this theory.)

Last edited by Adam1222; Jun 8, 2017 at 10:44 am
Adam1222 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2017, 8:39 pm
  #3310  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Programs: *G, oneworld Sapphire
Posts: 100
Ben just publicly announced his engagement to Ford. Shockingly, their engagement trip didn't visit any countries where homosexuality is illegal and/or punishable by death!
LeaveYourDailyHell is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2017, 2:34 am
  #3311  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
Who cares....
RTW1 is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2017, 9:03 am
  #3312  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,556
Originally Posted by RTW1
Who cares....
The obsessed people of have posted 221 pages in this thread, obviously
DYKWIA is online now  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 3:34 am
  #3313  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: STR, RSW
Posts: 75
While I agree that the lounge employee overreacted in this situation, I find it fascinating that it didn't cross Lucky's mind to use a public restroom outside the lounge..

http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...athroom-drama/
Bierjunge is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 4:49 am
  #3314  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Originally Posted by Bierjunge
While I agree that the lounge employee overreacted in this situation, I find it fascinating that it didn't cross Lucky's mind to use a public restroom outside the lounge..

http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...athroom-drama/
Aren't the bathrooms more "in" after security than the lounge? If so, then that makes sense. If not, it still makes sense when the blogger is there to document the "premium passenger" experience more so than the experience of we the plebes.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 7:29 am
  #3315  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Programs: *G, oneworld Sapphire
Posts: 100
The logistics of Ramadan and travel sure are interesting!
LeaveYourDailyHell is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.