|
Originally Posted by yerffej201
(Post 20945102)
Here are the PM's for your reference. I did not "MAKE" them up.
[images of PMs redacted] EDIT: FT ToS does not allow me to publish PM's. PM if you want to see details. Again, did they say yes? It's not even an issue of theirs as its my blog, but had they said no, please don't do this, then the post wouldn't have gone up. Their concerns was that had was that the space was going to go. "Their concerns was (sic) that had (sic) was (sic) that the space was going to go" means what??? |
Originally Posted by tcook052
(Post 20964724)
FT is a blog? Don't think so and adjusted the wiki accordingly.
what's good for the goose.... |
.............
|
Originally Posted by SingaporeDon
(Post 20964985)
Can you please explain in simple English, what you are trying to say in the sentences quoted above.
"Their concerns was (sic) that had (sic) was (sic) that the space was going to go" means what??? |
Originally Posted by SingaporeDon
(Post 20964985)
Can you please explain in simple English, what you are trying to say in the sentences quoted above.
"Their concerns was (sic) that had (sic) was (sic) that the space was going to go" means what???
Originally Posted by fti
(Post 20965922)
Most forum posters write with about a second grade grammar level unfortunately. Bloggers are almost as bad. I too have no clue what in the world he is trying to say!
"Their concern was that the SQ space was going to go." |
Too funny. MrPickles keeps moving his blog to the "does not censor" list.
|
Originally Posted by HikerT
(Post 20976879)
Too funny. MrPickles keeps moving his blog to the "does not censor" list.
|
Data point:
Points, miles and Martinis was encouraging his readers to get the US Air card with 30k miles and annual fee. I posted a comment saying that he should be ashamed of himself for promoting an inferior offer when there is a 35k no first yr. fee card easily available but it was censored. Guess we know which blogger is not getting my referral money. |
Originally Posted by mrpickles
(Post 20961531)
The comments were redacted for review and has since been released back on the site.
I can understand deleting Spam, or if a person's first comment gets accidentally caught in a spam filter, but you actively unpublished a comment of mine for more than 24 hours. That's censorship. |
The Points Guy - when a commenter said they drove 5 hours roundtrip to visit a chase branch for a united personal card, my comment linking to the united personal offer thread got moderated out twice. Not sure if they just don't like links in comments or what. I was pointing out that heading to a branch for the offer is unnecessary, contrary to the article.
|
Originally Posted by jsmithv
(Post 20983448)
The Points Guy - when a commenter said they drove 5 hours roundtrip to visit a chase branch for a united personal card, my comment linking to the united personal offer thread got moderated out twice. Not sure if they just don't like links in comments or what. I was pointing out that heading to a branch for the offer is unnecessary, contrary to the article.
I've written many times about the targeted United 55k+ offer- it was even a part of my last round of applications. However, it is targeted and the link to that Flyertalk is useless for someone who isn't targeted for the offer. The Chase branch tip (which clearly isn't my referral link) was just a tip for people who were not targeted for the 55k, but still wanted it since anyone can go into a Chase branch and get that offer. |
Originally Posted by jsmithv
(Post 20983448)
The Points Guy - when a commenter said they drove 5 hours roundtrip to visit a chase branch for a united personal card, my comment linking to the united personal offer thread got moderated out twice. Not sure if they just don't like links in comments or what. I was pointing out that heading to a branch for the offer is unnecessary, contrary to the article.
TPG, you need to update your program swag! Delta DM??? |
Originally Posted by thepointsguy
(Post 20983673)
I don't approve comments- they post instantly, so if you never saw it post, it's likely it got flagged as SPAM. Posting it again would likely have the same effect.
I've written many times about the targeted United 55k+ offer- it was even a part of my last round of applications. However, it is targeted and the link to that Flyertalk is useless for someone who isn't targeted for the offer. The Chase branch tip (which clearly isn't my referral link) was just a tip for people who were not targeted for the 55k, but still wanted it since anyone can go into a Chase branch and get that offer. |
Originally Posted by HikerT
(Post 20976879)
Too funny. MrPickles keeps moving his blog to the "does not censor" list.
18:38, 24 June 2013 Edited by: amolkold (76 chars removed) 12:24, 22 June 2013 Edited by: mrpickles (76 chars added | 76 chars removed) 19:56, 20 June 2013 Edited by: HikerT (76 chars added | 76 chars removed) 18:39, 20 June 2013 Edited by: mrpickles (76 chars added | 76 chars removed) 15:02, 19 June 2013 Edited by: yerffej201 (76 chars added | 64 chars removed) |
It would appear amolkold has redacted mrpickles comment for 24 hours. ;)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.