Flight Attendants Strike Vote
From May 13-June 6, BR flight attendants will be holding a strike vote in Taipei, Taoyuan, and Kaohsiung. According to the union, 2400 of the 3000 BR flight attendants, in addition to the 2800/5600 TFAU members, must approve the strike for it to go through.
Their demands are as follows:
The union also accuses the company of engaging in union-busting and intimidation tactics, such as bringing in members for 'consultations' and asking members if they'll work during the strike or not. The government will be hosting arbitration in the coming weeks for both sides. Chairman Lin has sued the union for accusing him of colluding with the local government. He claims defamation. A non-union member has accused the company's unionized workforce of intimidation and the creation of a hostile workplace. She accuses union leaders of encouraging members to call her the "company's dog", "kiss up", "management's insect" and other statements. The Taoyuan government is investigating. BR reminds employees that engaging in union activities or discussions while on the clock or on company property will result in termination. The union claims ignorance, and says they wish these people will join the union but won't use intimidation. |
Judging by the past strike vote...
Is going to be any communication on the vote counts while voting in progress? |
Originally Posted by unleashed
(Post 31079215)
Judging by the past strike vote...
Is going to be any communication on the vote counts while voting in progress? |
Today (5/8), Eva Air announced the suspension of year-end bonuses, suspension of raises, the suspension of discounted employee travel effective from the date of the strike for three years, suspension of all ZED travel (families and all), and employees that show up for work during the strike will not be affected. Eva Air says that this is due to the poor economic situation the companies bookings may have following a strike. It is only right that the company begin cost cutting to right the ship in a profitable direction.
|
Finally comes the push back.
The Union activists got all too clever for their own good... |
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 31078312)
A non-union member has accused the company's unionized workforce of intimidation and the creation of a hostile workplace. She accuses union leaders of encouraging members to call her the "company's dog", "kiss up", "management's insect" and other statements. The Taoyuan government is investigating. BR reminds employees that engaging in union activities or discussions while on the clock or on company property will result in termination. The union claims ignorance, and says they wish these people will join the union but won't use intimidation.
|
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 31079233)
Today (5/8), Eva Air announced the suspension of year-end bonuses, suspension of raises, the suspension of discounted employee travel effective from the date of the strike for three years, suspension of all ZED travel (families and all), and employees that show up for work during the strike will not be affected. Eva Air says that this is due to the poor economic situation the companies bookings may have following a strike. It is only right that the company begin cost cutting to right the ship in a profitable direction.
Also, cutting ID/ZED travel for three years almost seems illegal. The unions should have a right to strike without having their benefits taken away. (I understand not having ID travel during the strike). How much does ID travel actually cost the company? These tickets have no priority and only fill unsold seats. |
Originally Posted by BlackHappy
(Post 31080820)
I understand why they're doing this, but it seems kind of contradictory. Wasn't their point that all FAs would be treated equally (regardless of union membership)? Now, those that show up during the strike will have different benefits than those that actually strike.
|
Originally Posted by BlackHappy
(Post 31080820)
I understand why they're doing this, but it seems kind of contradictory. Wasn't their point that all FAs would be treated equally (regardless of union membership)? Now, those that show up during the strike will have different benefits than those that actually strike.
Also, cutting ID/ZED travel for three years almost seems illegal. The unions should have a right to strike without having their benefits taken away. (I understand not having ID travel during the strike). How much does ID travel actually cost the company? These tickets have no priority and only fill unsold seats. |
Originally Posted by gengar
(Post 31080936)
How is this at all contradictory? Striking is an action. It is not synonymous with union membership. Union members are certainly not obligated to strike (even if the unions, in typical protection racket form, might contractually obligate union members to pay fines if they don't participate in a strike). I'm not familiar with Taiwan labor law, but in the USA, for example, the NLRA applies to all workers - not just those in unions - so workers not represented by a union can "strike" just the same.
|
Originally Posted by BlackHappy
(Post 31081618)
It is contradictory because they want everyone to have the same benefits. But, now they’re saying the benefits will differ depending on who strikes. |
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 31081748)
These suspension of benefits hinges on if they vote to strike or not. They want employees to be "prepared mentally" for this.
|
Originally Posted by BlackHappy
(Post 31081618)
It is contradictory because they want everyone to have the same benefits. But, now they’re saying the benefits will differ depending on who strikes.
|
Originally Posted by gengar
(Post 31081902)
And again, striking is an action completely distinct from union membership. Every employee has to decide whether or not to strike - it has nothing to do with union membership. What BR said previously is that they must treat all employees the same, whether or not the employees have union membership. That is something completely different from announcing that there will be disparate treatment for employees who decide to strike.
|
Originally Posted by BlackHappy
(Post 31081919)
So they can treat FAs the same when it’s convenient for them but not when it’s inconvenient. Sounds like a contradiction to me. But, you’re entitled to your opinion. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:02 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.