Eva Air and TFAU Union Reach Negotiation Impasse
Post-Nov 29/30 meeting between the Taoyuan Flight Attendants Union and Eva Air, the union has threatened to shutdown negotiations and enter pre-strike arbitration as BR and TFAU have not been able to reach consensus on any issues for the last 3 months and TFAU feels that BR is beginning to ignore them as a union. BR has reminded the union that the company has taken steps to increase benefits and help improve the workplace in addition to helping shareholder equity, and is committed to stable and sustainable growth in the coming years.
The following demands have been made by TFAU, and BR has responded to each accordingly:
|
BR mgmt. is also reportedly wanting to have a shuteye rule amongst the crew, forcing crews to have 8 or 10 hours of lights off, door closed, shuteye rest prior to the flight. The union has not said anything, but this policy is reportedly a retaliatory policy as this would ruin a lot of shopping/exploration time the FA's have traditionally used, especially in the US/Canada. Crews have generally been out during the day, went back to the hotel around 4-5pm local time, taking a short 2-4 hour nap, before getting ready for the midnight flight.
|
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 30492709)
Crews have generally been out during the day, went back to the hotel around 4-5pm local time, taking a short 2-4 hour nap, before getting ready for the midnight flight.
|
BR is bringing the big hammer down. These FAs need to remember they are dealing with BR and not partially government owned CI.
Some of these demands are so laughable. BR is basically telling the union let's all follow the rules and have the bare minimum. You want rest? We will make sure you are actually resting lol... |
Originally Posted by Dave510
(Post 30494632)
No wonder the crew seems to be less cheerful on the flight out of YYZ.
|
Originally Posted by coolfish1103
(Post 30494826)
BR is bringing the big hammer down. These FAs need to remember they are dealing with BR and not partially government owned CI.
Some of these demands are so laughable. BR is basically telling the union let's all follow the rules and have the bare minimum. You want rest? We will make sure you are actually resting lol... |
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 30492709)
BR mgmt. is also reportedly wanting to have a shuteye rule amongst the crew, forcing crews to have 8 or 10 hours of lights off, door closed, shuteye rest prior to the flight.
|
Originally Posted by neuro0
(Post 30496478)
I wonder who is actually enforcing this rule?
Violate the rules and get caught by the safety team, CAA is contacted for safety violation, you are fired or heavily discplined(and this is recorded for you...going to be hard getting a job in the future), and you now have a record that may deny you any licensed aviation position(and possibly more). BR has actually screwed over many people's future through strict reporting of your discipline violations and your recorded incidents with the company in addition to "leaking" your irresponsibility to the media that may or may not be broadcast with your photo(your eyes are blurred of course and only your last name will be used). Media will be more than happy to pick up a safety violation story and run it to make a big deal out of it. |
TFAU has announced to its members that they are shutting down negotiations. After 20 negotiations, there is still no consensus on most issues. The differences between a CI FA and BR FA and growing larger and larger by the day. In response, BR mgmt refuses to step down and give in, instead inviting those unhappy with current conditions to leave. The media has hushed the issue on behalf of BR. Meanwhile, BR has reportedly hired a lobbying firm for their push for a special aviation labor law. Additionally, the board recently approved the hiring of a union busting law firm. |
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 30495129)
TFAU is using the same CI strategy with BR and it is clearly not working. The constant protests and the "pressure" clearly does not affect management and the government has been flat out ignoring them. BR instead is maneuvering behind the scenes to screw the union.
I don't think Tsai wants anything to do with them after getting screwed last time, plus DPP is not in need to sub in a guy of their own (and it's BR so government has no influence in making changes). |
Can someone explain if and when this could impact flights? Have two BR flights in January....could these be impacted?
Thanks |
Originally Posted by lax01
(Post 30499133)
Can someone explain if and when this could impact flights? Have two BR flights in January....could these be impacted?
Thanks |
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
(Post 30499427)
No. They are just voicing these grievances to the public right now.
Is this a generation thing or a labor-awareness thing in Taiwan? I wonder how Chairman Y.F. Chang would have handled these issues.... Any conditions on foreign cabin crews? With people beating down the airlines' doors to become FAs, how much power does the union have? |
Originally Posted by username
(Post 30499771)
Hoping the bad publicity will affect bookings and BR to give in?
Is this a generation thing or a labor-awareness thing in Taiwan? I wonder how Chairman Y.F. Chang would have handled these issues.... Any conditions on foreign cabin crews? With people beating down the airlines' doors to become FAs, how much power does the union have? Foreign crews are not able to join the union or advocate for their rights through them, though they are all paid well in terms of their local standards. BR actually has not hired a single FA this year, foreign or domestic. They are drastically cutting down the FA numbers and instead forcing FAs to work significantly more hours. |
I am with BR on this. FA is there to do a job. Not go explore a city or shopping. Rest period is a rest period. You want to explore, do it on your own time and dime. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.