CI vs BR
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Osaka
Programs: Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Gold, UA
Posts: 3,158
CI vs BR
I'm planning a trip from Osaka to Hong Kong in business class, and am considering using China Airlines. We've used Eva business class for 2 trips to Taipei, and also for our last trip to HK, and we've always been very happy with it. But for this upcoming trip, Evas's business class fare has gone up about US$450 from our previous trip and CI business class is about US$350 lower than BR, so for the 2 of us that is US$700.
I know that CI is not rated anywhere nearly as highly as BR, but is this difference worth it? How does CI regional business class compare?
Also, as now scheduled, the CI itinerary would involve changing terminals at TPE in both directions. Am I correct in assuming that this simply means a long walk for the connecting flights? On our last trip to TPE on BR we landed at one terminal but were told the baggage collection would be at the other terminal; the walk was long but not that bad.
Thanks for any input.
I know that CI is not rated anywhere nearly as highly as BR, but is this difference worth it? How does CI regional business class compare?
Also, as now scheduled, the CI itinerary would involve changing terminals at TPE in both directions. Am I correct in assuming that this simply means a long walk for the connecting flights? On our last trip to TPE on BR we landed at one terminal but were told the baggage collection would be at the other terminal; the walk was long but not that bad.
Thanks for any input.
Last edited by OsakaWino; Mar 15, 2018 at 1:46 am
#5
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Osaka
Programs: Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Gold, UA
Posts: 3,158
Thanks for the comments. If it just me I would take CX economy, but when I suggested that to my wife, who hates to fly and is indifferent to travel, she said "then let's stay home".
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?
#9
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CAN, LAX, TPE
Programs: AA, AS, CI, DL, UA
Posts: 2,898
Thanks for the comments. If it just me I would take CX economy, but when I suggested that to my wife, who hates to fly and is indifferent to travel, she said "then let's stay home".
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?
If you have no status with any airline then I would choose base on the fare alone. In the fare you quote I would choose either Hong Kong Airlines or China Airlines, then Cathay Pacific, ANA and EVA in that order. Regional is vastly different from long haul and I think the $ saving is worthy. I mean, it's only 4-5 hours...
In the case you choose CI, try to see if you can get on the 359 flight.
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Osaka
Programs: Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Gold, UA
Posts: 3,158
Most people will opt out CI due to their safety records, is that a thing in your mind?
If you have no status with any airline then I would choose base on the fare alone. In the fare you quote I would choose either Hong Kong Airlines or China Airlines, then Cathay Pacific, ANA and EVA in that order. Regional is vastly different from long haul and I think the $ saving is worthy. I mean, it's only 4-5 hours...
In the case you choose CI, try to see if you can get on the 359 flight.
If you have no status with any airline then I would choose base on the fare alone. In the fare you quote I would choose either Hong Kong Airlines or China Airlines, then Cathay Pacific, ANA and EVA in that order. Regional is vastly different from long haul and I think the $ saving is worthy. I mean, it's only 4-5 hours...
In the case you choose CI, try to see if you can get on the 359 flight.
Hong Kong Air is direct, but the outbound schedule on China Air is better for us. All the info I've seen for the CI flights were A330s, 2 flights with angled flat and 2 with extra reclining. That could change of course.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: AC
Posts: 2,167
Thanks for the detailed input. I really was not worried about CI's safety record, I thought that was pretty much in the past, long past. I was more considering hard and soft product. I know the soft product would be better on Cathay, ANA, and Eva, but the difference is fare for, as you say, such a short trip is considerable.
Hong Kong Air is direct, but the outbound schedule on China Air is better for us. All the info I've seen for the CI flights were A330s, 2 flights with angled flat and 2 with extra reclining. That could change of course.
Hong Kong Air is direct, but the outbound schedule on China Air is better for us. All the info I've seen for the CI flights were A330s, 2 flights with angled flat and 2 with extra reclining. That could change of course.
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Osaka
Programs: Hyatt Explorist, Hilton Gold, UA
Posts: 3,158
I thought CI's safety problems were all in long in the past, I guess I'll do some searching on the net...
#14
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SFO/SJC/OAK
Posts: 522
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
#15
Join Date: May 2015
Location: BWI
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 165
Thanks for the comments. If it just me I would take CX economy, but when I suggested that to my wife, who hates to fly and is indifferent to travel, she said "then let's stay home".
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?
So my choices are:
CX or ANA, both direct, at about US$1550.
BR or CI via TPE, US$1330 for BR and US$990 for CI.
Hong Kong Airlines, direct, US$850
None of the fairs vary within a week either way of our dates.
From what I've read, Hong Kong Airlines seems rather like something between and LLC and a full-service airline, and we don't mind changing in TPE is the fare is good (our last trip KIX to HKG on Eva business was just US$800), so that is why I'm leaning toward CI.
Although I would not expect CI to be as nice as BR, is CI regional business really that bad?