![]() |
Originally Posted by GoldieGhe
(Post 15727960)
Everything locallady mentioned can be easily done in 2 days, 3 days if you are very slow.
|
Originally Posted by GoldieGhe
(Post 15727960)
Vienna is a world class European capital with exquisite restaurants, famous music halls, grand architecture, unparalleled majesty, museums, parks, sopping, not to mention the best pastry I ever have; and these are just a few of my favorite things. Budapest, on the other hand, a cement-gray town full of old communist relics, graffiti, perfectly priced for people who want to experience the grandeur of the Austro-Hungarian empire but can afford only the Hungarian part.
GoldieGhe, you are from Vienna, right? ;) |
"The feeling is gone: only you and I. It means nothing to me. It means nothing to me: oh, Vienna."
(FWIW, I like both, but find Vienna a little formal and pretentious for my own taste. However, I'm biased towards Budapest as the result of a wonderful just-post-communist trip there in my mid-teens, and some great business trips where the clients could not have been more welcoming...) |
I sincerely regret if any of my comments offended anyone’s gentle sensibility. And for curios minds; no, I am not from Vienna, presently live in US, although, I was born in what once upon a time was called Deutsche Demokratische Republik (East Germany). It just happen to like Vienna a whole lot more than Budapest. And for people who enjoy old and drab I suggest Bucharest. I am no architect, but I believe that technically the city is build out of old drab. In my earlier postings I was just stating my opinion, and as a famous poet once said “Opinions are like anal orifices, everyone has one.” If my opinion was articulated in such inartful way that it caused distress to any of you, once again, I humbly apologize.
|
Originally Posted by GoldieGhe
(Post 15738216)
And for people who enjoy old and drab I suggest Bucharest. I am no architect, but I believe that technically the city is build out of old drab.
You have to consider the general negligence for upkeep of the infrastructure that it suffered over decades, and while in general it is - as you said - grey and old, I could still spend a couple of days there and leave seeing some real pretty sights. BTW, your preference for Vienna might be partially biased by understanding the language the locals speak. You might not be aware of it at first, but it does make a difference, and it does make a new city seem more familiar and welcoming. Unfortunately, Budapest provides nobody with that advantage :D Greetings from Intercontinental Bucharest, BTW - I'm there till tomorrow :) |
Originally Posted by hdogan
(Post 15738422)
Greetings from Intercontinental Bucharest, BTW - I'm there till tomorrow :)
|
Originally Posted by GoldieGhe
(Post 15739276)
Carul cu Bere is also great.
|
Originally Posted by stut
(Post 15733549)
find Vienna a little formal and pretentious for my own taste.
Be careful with taxis, they are notorious for ripping-off tourist. Also the restaurants have a nasty habit of overcharging tourists. I guess the communist habits are hard to break. |
I put together some info in this thread a while ago
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/europ...ary-guide.html |
Originally Posted by GoldieGhe
(Post 15713000)
If you must, spend the most 2-3 days in Budapest, but Vienna is lot more fun and interesting. In February the weather is brutally cold.
Depends on where you are coming from. My teenager just left for Budapest and saying it so warm there (10°C) vs it's so cold here (-15°C) |
Originally Posted by WilcoRoger
(Post 15844493)
:D:D
Depends on where you are coming from. My teenager just left for Budapest and saying it so warm there (10°C) vs it's so cold here (-15°C) By the way, all of them have kinda the same climate. Bucharest is a bit warmer I suppose... Be safe on your travels. |
I think there's no point in comparing Vienna and Budapest, even though I am going to compare them :D . They have different history, thus they offer different things. Budapest was destroyed many times(1541, 1686, 1849,1944-'45), so BUD can consider itself lucky to have a few old, historical buildings remaining. Vienna was more lucky in history, noone ever destroyed it, so Vienna still has the medieval face too.
Vienna is way richer than Budapest, so if you are looking for perfectly renovated buildings, architectural monuments, Vienna may be a better choice. Vienna also has a great cultural life(opera, theatre, etc), and in the winter it's amazing! I also liked the Stefan Kirche and visiting small, hidden restaurants for real austrian food. In Budapest, you can still see 1956 bullets in the walls, it may seem as a dirty jungle, but it also has a cultural life, but that's different, maybe younger people prefers(not just because it's way cheaper). The values of Budapest doesn't advertise themselves, you have go explore them for yourself. I think that they are two different worlds, Vienna is a bit pretentious, snobby, for people who prefers cleaned streets, luxury, or at least richer cities. Budapest is for those, who want to experience something else. The hidden inns(I recommend Szimpla Café near the Synagoge), the termal baths, the Castle, old houses offer you a glance at history Sorry if I was a bit biased, Budapest is my beloved home city... :) This is also an offer, you can ask me questions if you are interested(I've been to Vienna 3-4 times too, so I may be able to answer these questions too). :) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.