Old Nov 12, 2017, 2:06 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: ft101
Emirates has unveiled the new first class cabin for their 777s at the Dubai Air Show on November 12th, 2017.

Notably, the new F cabin is fully enclosed from floor to ceiling, has a reduction from 8 seats to 6 total, had virtual windows for the center cabins and features video-based room service ordering.

Business and Economy cabins have also been refreshed, but not completely overhauled.

Dedicated 777 refresh page DEAD LINK
Emirates Press Release (includes PDF downloads of fact sheet with more details) DEAD LINK
Youtube Promo video of new 777F
Here's the replacement for the dead links:
https://www.emirates.com/media-centre/emirates-unveils-brand-new-cabins-for-its-boeing-777-fleet/


Aircraft with new F (only 77W):
A6-EQH - EQP
Total: 9 aircraft

Current known routes flown with new F:

GVA - EK83 / EK84
BRU - EK181 / EK182
FRA - EK43 / EK44
HND - EK312 / EK313
JFK - EK201 / EK202
STN - EK33 / EK34 EK65 / EK66 (suspended)
VIE - EK125 / EK126
SIN - EK352/353 (unscheduled)
MUC - EK53/54


Update 13th June 2022 from post #1016
Routes operating with the new F as of Aug 1, 2022 include:
EK045 FRA*
EK065 STN
EK077 NCE
EK083 GVA
EK085 ZRH
EK089 GVA
EK181 BRU
EK183 BRU
EK819 RUH
EK318 NRT

*EK45 is also frequently operated by a 2-class 77W, but when flown as a 3-class, it is the new F configuration.







Print Wikipost

777 New First Class

Old Nov 12, 2017, 11:21 am
  #151  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 876
CX has been having 1-1-1 in F for a long time in tgeir B777
jjjohn is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 11:24 am
  #152  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,455
Originally Posted by HKprince
Does anyone else think the service will suffer as a result of the new seat? Can't help but imagine it will be less personalized with cabin crew slipping canapes through the little service window and the 'room service' video call function allows them to be less proactive.

Also, as a privacy issue; isn't it a safety requirement for cabin crew to be able to see passengers? I know the current F has a camera in the cabin so that pax are in view. Does this mean they will be able to activate the camera from the video call function? That wouldn't be as private now would it...
Considering the original design idea for the suite was that people would call the galley with food orders, and that literally no one does so, Id say crew will be along in person as usual

As for crew visibility, the requirement is access - the suites can be opened from the outside - otherwise EY would have had problems with their configs!
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 12:13 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: WY SL, EK Gold, CX MPO
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Considering the original design idea for the suite was that people would call the galley with food orders, and that literally no one does so, Id say crew will be along in person as usual

As for crew visibility, the requirement is access - the suites can be opened from the outside - otherwise EY would have had problems with their configs!
Ahh right that explains it! So what's the reason for the camera in current F? I thought it was necessary for cabin crew to have a clear view of passengers during takeoff/landing. That's why some airlines have slots in the bulkhead so that crew can see into the next cabin.
HKprince is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 12:44 pm
  #154  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SFO, BRU, ADB
Programs: UA Gold, BA Silver, Marriott Titanium, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 708
First routes are apparently going to be BRU and GVA, quite surprising they chose these over anything else... Starting December 1st.
Mict is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 12:47 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 79
Yes, what is the rationale behind DXB-BRU/GVA? I'm not challenging it, but just want to be enlightened.
Uzair is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 12:50 pm
  #156  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,806

Great detailed tour of the new F, as well as rest of the aircraft
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 12:50 pm
  #157  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SFO, BRU, ADB
Programs: UA Gold, BA Silver, Marriott Titanium, IHG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 708
Originally Posted by Uzair
Yes, what is the rationale behind DXB-BRU/GVA? I'm not challenging it, but just want to be enlightened.
I guess BRU has some premium pax with Nato and the EU but still, feel like they have more premium heavy markets served with the 77W.
Mict is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:12 pm
  #158  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,455
Originally Posted by HKprince
Ahh right that explains it! So what's the reason for the camera in current F? I thought it was necessary for cabin crew to have a clear view of passengers during takeoff/landing. That's why some airlines have slots in the bulkhead so that crew can see into the next cabin.
I imagine the doors will be locked to open during takeoff/landing as they are currently.
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:19 pm
  #159  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,806
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
I imagine the doors will be locked to open during takeoff/landing as they are currently.
100%, safety issue in case of evac
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:21 pm
  #160  
Ambassador: Emirates
IHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK/AU
Programs: QF P1 + LTS, EK Gold, BAEC Gold, QR Gold, IHG Ambassador
Posts: 1,158
I am not a fan of the curtains.
sydtogla is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:24 pm
  #161  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: In transit
Programs: AF/KL BA GF EK EY LH QR
Posts: 587
Originally Posted by sydtogla
I am not a fan of the curtains.
My jury is still out on this one as well. Could be a nice feature - or utterly impractical and gathering dust (plus greasy fingerprints).
XXTSGR is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:25 pm
  #162  
Ambassador: Emirates
IHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: UK/AU
Programs: QF P1 + LTS, EK Gold, BAEC Gold, QR Gold, IHG Ambassador
Posts: 1,158
Originally Posted by XXTSGR
My jury is still out on this one as well. Could be a nice feature - or utterly impractical and gathering dust (plus greasy fingerprints).
It is the fingerprints I'm worried about. It just feels like it will age quite quickly.
sydtogla is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 1:27 pm
  #163  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: In transit
Programs: AF/KL BA GF EK EY LH QR
Posts: 587
Originally Posted by sydtogla
It is the fingerprints I'm worried about. It just feels like it will age quite quickly.
I agree. Maybe they'll replace them after every leg...
sydtogla likes this.
XXTSGR is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 2:49 pm
  #164  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: Skywards
Posts: 105
Originally Posted by HKprince
Does anyone else think the service will suffer as a result of the new seat? Can't help but imagine it will be less personalized with cabin crew slipping canapes through the little service window and the 'room service' video call function allows them to be less proactive.

Also, as a privacy issue; isn't it a safety requirement for cabin crew to be able to see passengers? I know the current F has a camera in the cabin so that pax are in view. Does this mean they will be able to activate the camera from the video call function? That wouldn't be as private now would it...
On most routes F is rather empty anyway. So the number of Pax probably wont change.

IMO, they should have sacrificed one seat and make a nice spacey bathroom. This is the biggest minus IMO compared to the A380 and for me a reason to not upgrade to F on 777. The seat itself I don't really care. The old F seat was good enough already.
Coffee drinker is offline  
Old Nov 12, 2017, 2:56 pm
  #165  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,806
Originally Posted by Coffee drinker
On most routes F is rather empty anyway. So the number of Pax probably wont change.

IMO, they should have sacrificed one seat and make a nice spacey bathroom. This is the biggest minus IMO compared to the A380 and for me a reason to not upgrade to F on 777. The seat itself I don't really care. The old F seat was good enough already.
They already removed 2 seats for the new cabin
skywardhunter is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.