FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Emirates | Skywards (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/emirates-skywards-490/)
-   -   Arrival time change (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/emirates-skywards/1780302-arrival-time-change.html)

JMGPhila Jul 25, 2016 7:35 am


Originally Posted by Saltire74 (Post 26962555)
Received an e-mail about an hour ago with the same thing for my PEK-DXB flight in November. Departure time the same. Arrival time 10 minutes earlier. An extra 10 minutes in the lounge (hopefully :D).

Safe & Happy Travels

S

I enjoy your proverb. Mine is: "Never date a woman whom pays her rent in singles." :)

ioto1902 Jul 25, 2016 8:29 am

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26964599)
...
Anyways, I have not flown on the A380 yet, so that is why I hope to. I imagine the 777 has a nice First cabin as well...

777 FCL is a little bit cramped IMO as there is "only" 8 suites. Compared to A388, ceiling is higher (no overhead bin on both), window suites have narrower width, of course no shower, standard lav, no bar, and no stair to look down the cattle :D .
In short, I'll curse Airbus if they stop the type.

Forgot : At some outstation, only L2 door is used. If the crew is not attentive, you'll deplane after many JCL. (happened last week :mad:)

JMGPhila Jul 25, 2016 8:38 am


Originally Posted by ioto1902 (Post 26965001)
777 FCL is a little bit cramped IMO as there is "only" 8 suites. Compared to A388, ceiling is higher (no overhead bin on both), window suites have narrower width, of course no shower, standard lav, no bar, and no stair to look down the cattle :D .
In short, I'll curse Airbus if they stop the type.

Forgot : At some outstation, only L2 door is used. If the crew is not attentive, you'll deplane after many JCL. (happened last week :mad:)

I agree from the perspective shown the picture. Looks cramped even compared to A330. I wouldn't pitch a fuss if changed out for a 789, but still wouldn't happy about it. I have read on here from some that say the 777 First is BA's finest product. I doubt that heavily, but cannot actually give a valid opinion. I would assume the A380 is, although again not valid. I highly doubt the 777 is anything like the 789 either. The 789 is hard to beat, IMO

m3red Jul 25, 2016 9:34 am

I don't think the 777 is cramped at all.

I enjoyed 12 hours back from Tokyo early Feb and it was great,

ioto1902 Jul 25, 2016 9:56 am

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26965050)
... Looks cramped even compared to A330. ...

Particularly if you are the only pax :D:D:D (was seated in 1A, ... Pavlov reaction ...)

JMGPhila Jul 25, 2016 10:36 am


Originally Posted by m3red (Post 26965333)
I don't think the 777 is cramped at all.

I enjoyed 12 hours back from Tokyo early Feb and it was great,

Although rhetorical, I guess I should have just said, "The space looks smaller than the A330 suites." But I imagine it is comfortable, anyways.

JMGPhila Jul 25, 2016 10:37 am


Originally Posted by ioto1902 (Post 26965471)
Particularly if you are the only pax :D:D:D (was seated in 1A, ... Pavlov reaction ...)

I can only assume thats Emirates??? I haven't flown with them.

ioto1902 Jul 25, 2016 10:54 am


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26965683)
I can only assume thats Emirates??? I haven't flown with them.

Yes it is.
Avoid flying in one of the very few remaining ships. You'll have a taste of what was considered the most comfortable way of flying ... 20 years ago.

DYKWIA Jul 25, 2016 11:11 am


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26965050)
I wouldn't pitch a fuss if changed out for a 789, but still wouldn't happy about it.

I would... as EK don't have any 789s. :) Or any 787s come to that.

JMGPhila Jul 25, 2016 11:17 am


Originally Posted by DYKWIA (Post 26965857)
I would... as EK don't have any 789s. :) Or any 787s come to that.

Good to know, but I havent ever and will likely never fly Emirates, anyways.

bostonbali Jul 25, 2016 2:14 pm


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26964717)
Also, a change in equipment under International General Rules allows for a customer to change their flight, free of any fees.

Change of Equipment: (Unacceptable to the passenger)
AREA: ZZ TARIFF: IPRGCXR: AARULE: 0002
TITLE/APPLICATION - 70
STANDARD FORMAT OF ELECTRONIC RULES
Penalties-86 Category 15 4(c)iii

Can you please post the link to this paragraph and the International General Rules?

All I could find is, unfortunately, a contradictory sentence in the Contact of Carriage:
5.5 Aircraft
5.5.1 We will try to provide the aircraft specified in our timetable (or specified to you at the time of issue of your Ticket) for your carriage, but cannot guarantee any particular aircraft will be used. We can change the aircraft on which you will be carried, whether for operational, safety, security reasons or otherwise.
5.5.2 Very occasionally, it may be necessary for us temporarily to supplement our fleet with aircraft operated for us by another airline. If this applies to any aircraft on which you are due to be carried by us, we will inform you of the identity of the operator of the aircraft, or try to ensure that our Authorised Agents give you such information. We will try also to ensure that you receive the same level of in-flight service and entertainment advertised for your flight, but cannot guarantee that this will always be possible.

ioto1902 Jul 25, 2016 8:19 pm


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26964717)
Also, a change in equipment under International General Rules allows for a customer to change their flight, free of any fees.

Change of Equipment: (Unacceptable to the passenger)
AREA: ZZ TARIFF: IPRGCXR: AARULE: 0002
TITLE/APPLICATION - 70
STANDARD FORMAT OF ELECTRONIC RULES
Penalties-86 Category 15 4(c)iii

Furthermore, a refund or change without penalty at option to the passenger is in order when there is more than 60 total minutes in change to arrival and/or departure time. Let me know if you want the § for that.


Sorry for my ignorance.
What is "International General Rules" ? Is this IATA ? Is this a law ? Is this just policy ? What is it's enforcing power ? Are airline personnel aware of it ? Can you oppose it at check-in ?

Dave Noble Jul 25, 2016 10:07 pm


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26964717)
Also, a change in equipment under International General Rules allows for a customer to change their flight, free of any fees.

Change of Equipment: (Unacceptable to the passenger)
AREA: ZZ TARIFF: IPRGCXR: AARULE: 0002
TITLE/APPLICATION - 70
STANDARD FORMAT OF ELECTRONIC RULES
Penalties-86 Category 15 4(c)iii

Furthermore, a refund or change without penalty at option to the passenger is in order when there is more than 60 total minutes in change to arrival and/or departure time. Let me know if you want the § for that.

That looks like a pasting of terms from AA's conditions of carriage ( https://www.aa.com/i18n/Tariffs/AA1.html#0087 ) rather than EK's

Saltire74 Jul 26, 2016 12:18 am


Originally Posted by JMGPhila (Post 26964739)
I enjoy your proverb. Mine is: "Never date a woman whom pays her rent in singles." :)

Ha ha. Good one. Unfortunately I don't always heed to mine :p.

Safe & Happy Travels

S

ukdoctor Jul 26, 2016 2:11 am

This gets even worse.

I got an email today with a new eticket without any information that there has been a change in my flights.

Instead of leaving on an early morning flight, I now have to leave the night before to make my connection to EK15

The change in times means that I now have a 8 hr transit at DXB rather than a 2 hr transit. :-(


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:48 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.