Community
Wiki Posts
Search

El Al narrowbody fleet future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2022, 2:31 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Paris, France
Programs: El Al Matmid, Air France Flying Blue Silver
Posts: 2,294
El Al narrowbody fleet future

Hi
some of LY 738s are getting old.
what is LY plan for their narrow body fleet?
LY777 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2022, 10:46 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montréal
Programs: Air Canada, Hyatt
Posts: 1,376
Originally Posted by LY777
Hi
some of LY 738s are getting old.
what is LY plan for their narrow body fleet?
There is no plan.

Since they can't afford to buy C-Series / A220 for both financial & political reasons, you can be 99.9% sure that when the time times they'll place an order for 737-Max series aircraft.
Unfortunate as the A220 & A321LR or XLR would suit them perfectly.

LY fleet will continue to be all Boeing for the foreseeable future.
737-8 & 737-9 for narrowbody
787-8 & 787-9 for widebody.
Maybe we'll see them get a few 787-10 for trunk routes to New York / Newark, London, Paris & Bangkok but I doubt even that will happen.
rafi2k6 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2022, 7:46 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,321
And 777X, as well. Will they ever order the 777X? lots of people who are going to Israel. The flight always full everyday. For EWR, JFK, LHR, MIA to TLV. They need more demand, still have more demand.

787-9 is not right aircraft. They should ordering the 777-9X. They need more aircraft, adding more new routes, new narrowbody.

They should orders the 737-MAX9 or -MAX10. It is time to order a new aircraft. The 738 is getting too old.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 22, 2022, 6:51 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by rafi2k6
There is no plan.

Since they can't afford to buy C-Series / A220 for both financial & political reasons, you can be 99.9% sure that when the time times they'll place an order for 737-Max series aircraft.
This reminds me of Iran under the sactions. And DPRK.
momoflyingguy is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2022, 10:42 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
Originally Posted by momoflyingguy
This reminds me of Iran under the sactions. And DPRK.
If the 220 was still officially Canadian, that'd probably be easier... but they have a US production line so it probably would be politically OK.
entropy is offline  
Old Jul 2, 2022, 3:31 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Israel
Programs: LY, BT
Posts: 126
Basically, there’s some serious consideration inside the company to get rid of most of the 738s. This was almost a done deal about a year ago, but the current spike in demand has put those plans on hold for now.
The 739 is doing great as a work horse for the company, not to mention that the hard product (including WiFi and all) is more than competitive to what most of their competitors offer to Europe these days.
Regarding the 787-9, LY is actually very, very happy with them, there are few Boeing customers that are able to squeeze as much revenue out of those as LY during peak season to North America.
The company fully understands that their biggest challenge is EK‘s entry to the market which has the potential to kill big parts of their business to the east, especially for almost all destinations that require connections (think Manila, Singapore, Tokyo, AU, NZ, etc.)
Let see what Biden‘s visit to the region gets us in this regard.
None of the above matters if they can’t get their pilot Union to play ball, obviously. I’m as much of an LY fanboy as you can be these days, but after I’ve had my third paid C ticket cancelled within hours from departure (and no call center to provide a solution without pulling strings), I’m officially done flying with these clowns for this year.
elal767 is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2022, 12:06 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montréal
Programs: Air Canada, Hyatt
Posts: 1,376
Originally Posted by elal767
Basically, there’s some serious consideration inside the company to get rid of most of the 738s. This was almost a done deal about a year ago, but the current spike in demand has put those plans on hold for now.
The 739 is doing great as a work horse for the company, not to mention that the hard product (including WiFi and all) is more than competitive to what most of their competitors offer to Europe these days.
Regarding the 787-9, LY is actually very, very happy with them, there are few Boeing customers that are able to squeeze as much revenue out of those as LY during peak season to North America.
The company fully understands that their biggest challenge is EK‘s entry to the market which has the potential to kill big parts of their business to the east, especially for almost all destinations that require connections (think Manila, Singapore, Tokyo, AU, NZ, etc.)
Let see what Biden‘s visit to the region gets us in this regard.
None of the above matters if they can’t get their pilot Union to play ball, obviously. I’m as much of an LY fanboy as you can be these days, but after I’ve had my third paid C ticket cancelled within hours from departure (and no call centre to provide a solution without pulling strings), I’m officially done flying with these clowns for this year.
You make some interesting points.

I was not aware of the plan to dump the 738's. Were they to be replaced with additional 739's?
I mean, I suppose it could be a good move- higher capacity = lower CASM. I guess they could replace the 15 738's + 8 739's with 25 - 30 737-MAX9's eventually?

I'm not shocked that the 789's are working out well for LY, it's a right-sized aircraft for their needs. In other discussions, I've sometimes made the argument that a small sub-fleet of 787-10 could be useful for trunk routes, but if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

All that being said, It's still a shame that LY cannot realistically order any C-Series / A220 aircraft, I feel like the lower capacity and ultra-efficiency of those machines could allow them to more profitably operate more destinations, year-round. Oh well.
rafi2k6 is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2022, 5:14 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Israel
Programs: LY, BT
Posts: 126
787-10 is a fair point but it would just introduce more complexity. Even the 787-8 was a point of contention, however it has proven to be a life saver when it allowed them to continue operating routes that had high premium demands and lower LFs in Y. Add to that the significantly lower cost of purchase on the -8

The A220s are actually too small to be a good fit for LY. The biggest advantage of the 737-900ER is that when all is done and said, it can also do serious GW loads to further destinations like RAK. Long term that means they’ll find themselves buying MAXes, but that’s still at least a decade away imho.
elal767 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.