P6 (Privilege Style) 767 to operate on behalf of LY
Jul 5, 2015, 3:04 pm
#32
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Israel
Programs: LY, BT
Posts: 126
Hi
My 2 cents -
1. Wet leases always suck, no matter what
2. The 767 is OK, so is the C on there, especially when compared to the competition to Europe.
3. The 737 is OK for Y passengers, but truly sucks for anyone who paid for Y+. Add to that how bad UP is with refunds - I'm still waiting to be reimbursed for my Y+ seat which wasn't there ex-SXF because the plane had been reconfigured for the use of Ruvi Rivlin and they screwed up the entire cabin in the process.
My 2 cents -
1. Wet leases always suck, no matter what
2. The 767 is OK, so is the C on there, especially when compared to the competition to Europe.
3. The 737 is OK for Y passengers, but truly sucks for anyone who paid for Y+. Add to that how bad UP is with refunds - I'm still waiting to be reimbursed for my Y+ seat which wasn't there ex-SXF because the plane had been reconfigured for the use of Ruvi Rivlin and they screwed up the entire cabin in the process.
Dec 31, 2015, 1:31 pm
#34
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: All of them...
Posts: 382
Look BOS is PS 767 for some time in Jan, and EWR/CDG and some JFK are PS 777 as well
http://www.elal.com/en/About-ELAL/Ab...e-Airline.aspx
http://www.elal.com/SiteCollectionDo...ime-311215.pdf
http://www.elal.com/SiteCollectionDo...-LT-221215.pdf
http://www.elal.com/en/About-ELAL/Ab...e-Airline.aspx
http://www.elal.com/SiteCollectionDo...ime-311215.pdf
http://www.elal.com/SiteCollectionDo...-LT-221215.pdf